Mike Pettine-Idiot

• like_that

  

  rydawg5;1611802 wrote:Derek Anderson was a pro bowler, so should we sign him too?

  I can argue DA was better than weeden. Also he was a pro bowl alternate...
  
  We signed two QBs to very small contracts because the only QB we had on the roster is a QB recovering from ACL rehab. Not to mention the players probably thought weeden was an incompetent QB and they are happy he is gone. I don't understand how this is confusing to anybody.
• rydawg5

  like_that;1611805 wrote:I can argue DA was better than weeden. Also he was a pro bowl alternate...
  
  We signed two QBs to very small contracts because the only QB we had on the roster is a QB recovering from ACL rehab. Not to mention the players probably thought weeden was an incompetent QB and they are happy he is gone. I don't understand how this is confusing to anybody.

  I'm not confused. I was just stating a fact that we canned Weeded but didn't replace him with anyone better.
  
  I believe Young was an "alternate" in at least 1 of his pro bowls as well, but anyway... You defending Vince Young like his is still "that guy" from 2006 leads me to believe that you are the confused one.
• like_that

  

  rydawg5;1611806 wrote:I'm not confusing. I was just stating a fact that we canned Weeded but didn't replace him with anyone better.
  
  I believe Young was an "alternate" in at least 1 of his pro bowls as well, but anyway... You defending Vince Young like his is still "that guy" from 2006 leads me to believe that you are the confused one.

  You're the one who brought up Young. Derp.
  
  Anyway, you can stick to coming up with arguments on why weeden should still be on our roster competing to be the third QB (LOL). I will stick to discussing players who actually will get major playing time. Thanks.
• SportsAndLady

  

  rydawg5;1611801 wrote:I guess the "point" was we got rid of a guy who would have been a better qb than 2 guys we just signed for backup qbs?

  Who gives a fuck? It's our 3rd string QB for Christ sake.
• rydawg5

  like_that;1611807 wrote:You're the one who brought up Young. Derp.
  
  Anyway, you can stick to coming up with arguments on why weeden should still be on our roster competing to be the third QB (LOL). I will stick to discussing players who actually will get major playing time. Thanks.

  
  So moving on to "major playing time players" are you in love with Mcgahee because of his pro bowls or do you think someone new will take the reign as starting RB even without the Pro Bowl Credentials?
• rydawg5

  SportsAndLady;1611808 wrote:Who gives a fuck? It's our 3rd string QB for Christ sake.

  After the first 2 get hurt it will be our #1
• SportsAndLady

  

  rydawg5;1611810 wrote:After the first 2 get hurt it will be our #1

  Yes that's generally how it works.
• Lovejoy1984

  

  rydawg5;1611809 wrote:So moving on to "major playing time players" are you in love with Mcgahee because of his pro bowls or do you think someone new will take the reign as starting RB even without the Pro Bowl Credentials?

  McGahee isn't even on the team this year.
  
  
  So let me get this straight..... You think that the Browns should've kept Weeden, with his high salary, to be the #3 QB, ahead of signing 2 QB's to contracts that don't equal his, not to mention are Younger, and have had more career success?
• rydawg5

  HighRoller74;1611812 wrote:McGahee isn't even on the team this year.
  
  
  So let me get this straight..... You think that the Browns should've kept Weeden, with his high salary, to be the #3 QB, ahead of signing 2 QB's to contracts that don't equal his, not to mention are Younger, and have had more career success?

  Nope not saying we should have kept him, not sure where I said that. But I did say we downgraded for backups with Vince Young and Thigpen.
  
  For future posts, are you always going to put words in my mouth or is this like a one-time thing?
• Lovejoy1984

  

  Did I put words in your mouth or ask you a question to understand you stance on this matter?
  
  Just trying to understand your point of view.
• Lovejoy1984

  

  But back to the subject at hand. As really don't feel like arguing on the internet.
  
  I personally don't think its a downgrade, due to Weeden never showing he could be a competent player in the NFL. Where as the other two have had a moderate amount of success. And at the same time, I don't really think either guy will be on the roster opening day.
• rydawg5

  HighRoller74;1611823 wrote:But back to the subject at hand. As really don't feel like arguing on the internet.
  
  I personally don't think its a downgrade, due to Weeden never showing he could be a competent player in the NFL. Where as the other two have had a moderate amount of success. And at the same time, I don't really think either guy will be on the roster opening day.

  
  Fair Enough.
• Commander of Awesome

  

  Weeden is 30+, 3rd string bs are supposed to be developmental guys. FW fails again, lolfail
• Classyposter58

  

  Footwedge;1611734 wrote:Wrong. Gruden has all but said that Bridgewater should be off the table.

  I like Teddy too but man he just doesn't blow you away ya know? I think he'll be another Sam Bradford type
• like_that

  

  Commander of Awesome;1611832 wrote:Weeden is 30+, 3rd string bs are supposed to be developmental guys. FW fails again, lolfail

  It was actually rydawg who failed this time around.