Week 4: Bengals @ the Brian Hoyer Show (Browns)
-
like_that
No one wants that reds reverse jinx bullshit in here. GFY.Terry_Tate;1506048 wrote:Browns win 3-0. Gordon and Cameron suck and Browns get a late INT to put them in field goal range. -
GOONx19Go Brownies.
-
Terry_Tate
Bengals win 30-0 as Josh Gordon and Jordan Cameron are held to zero catches.like_that;1506058 wrote:No one wants that reds reverse jinx bullshit in here. GFY. -
Midstate01
Maybe not. Since apparently pacman was arrestedCommander of Awesome;1505958 wrote:Zac Jackson ‏@FSOhioZJackson now
Bengals may be without Leon Hall (hamstring) for matchup with Josh Gordon Sunday. Gordon and Pacman will have plenty to talk about.
yes please -
Ironman92Ike Taylor held Green to 6 rec for 41 yds and no TD...this is with a shitty non-existent pass rush never touching Dalton. Seemed like about 20 yards were after the catch on missed tackles.
Bengals 31
Browns 23 -
RotinajBrowns win 40-3.
-
Commander of AwesomeNate Ulrich ‏@NateUlrichABJ 7m #Browns' Phil Taylor on Adrian Peterson’s tweet: "He can say what he wants, but he wasn’t a factor in the game"
That's a pwn. -
wes_mantooth
Can't see us only scoring 40.Rotinaj;1506083 wrote:Browns win 40-3. -
Commander of Awesome
Can't see the Browns giving up that many pts. Might be the bengals total yardage.Rotinaj;1506083 wrote:Browns win 40-3. -
Rotinaj
I was being conservative. Didn't want to give all the Bengals fans hurt feelz.wes_mantooth;1506098 wrote:Can't see us only scoring 40. -
ohiobucks135-27 Browns
-
Pick6Return of the Bungals: Pacman strikes back
http://www.foxsportsohio.com/nfl/cincinnati-bengals/story/Pacman-in-trouble-again?blockID=943463&feedID=3724 -
shook_17Browns lose. Same shit different year. 4-12 chud will be fired after this game. On to a new 5 year plan
-
BR1986FBWeek 3 is over. Should this be pinned at the top of the page?
-
Heretic
In other news, the sun rose. What a total life fuck-up.Midstate01;1506074 wrote:Maybe not. Since apparently pacman was arrested -
gerb131Pacman been pretty good for us this year.
Bengals 34 browns 16 -
Big_Mirg_ZHSThinking about going to this one as well. Hopefully it will go better than last year when me and @gerb131 went
-
gerb131
Yea it was a bust lolBig_Mirg_ZHS;1506612 wrote:Thinking about going to this one as well. Hopefully it will go better than last year when me and @gerb131 went
When I get back I'm gonna try get a game in -
Azubuike24Pacman's charge was a misdemeanor, and while there aren't many details, I have a feeling a lot of it had to do with the fact that he is Pacman Jones and anything involving him and the law will make big headlines.
I'm guessing nothing happens at all. -
TiernanBengals win this one pulling away.
-
thavoiceIF IF IF Chud really doesnt know who he will start I think that he is a fool.
I am thinking he knew the second the game was over whom he was starting next week, but for "competitive" or whatever reasons he was not going to commit -
BR1986FB
This is just stupid. Like the Bengals don't have film on both QB's. So dumb when coaches do this.thavoice;1507088 wrote:IF IF IF Chud really doesnt know who he will start I think that he is a fool.
I am thinking he knew the second the game was over whom he was starting next week, but for "competitive" or whatever reasons he was not going to commit -
thavoice
Oh I know it is stupid. Other than really not knowing whom would start then why not commit to the guy who actually interjected energy into the offense and won a game?BR1986FB;1507090 wrote:This is just stupid. Like the Bengals don't have film on both QB's. So dumb when coaches do this. -
BR1986FB
This "element of surprise" might work if Chud came out of nowhere and started a first time starter who the opponent had no film on. So dumb when coaches do this thinking they have an advantage.thavoice;1507093 wrote:Oh I know it is stupid. Other than really not knowing whom would start then why not commit to the guy who actually interjected energy into the offense and won a game? -
GoChiefsHoyer is starting.