Archive

2013 Random NFL Chatter

  • Automatik
    Jones is going to be a good one.
  • Ironman92
    Automatik;1517400 wrote:Jones is going to be a good one.
    Zero doubt IMO
  • Ironman92
    The Oline earned an "F" in the first quarter but about a "B" the rest of the game. If not for Meachum.....I couldn't complain.

    Roethlisberger was really good. Rookie LB's good, defense with two takeaways. Polamalu exploded on Hill....

    This is why I watched S&L
  • rydawg5
    Let's go Bills! Keep Browns tied for 1st place in AFC North.
  • said_aouita
    Forgot Denard Robinson plays for the Jags.

    Makes sense he's on a team with zero wins.
  • Iliketurtles
    Lol Saints just got screwed out of a first down there.
  • robj55
    Pryor with a nightmare second half today, sacked 10 times on the day but it could have been 15 if not for him being able to move around and escape. Good lord that offensive line is bad, and they had so many penalties it was crazy, crowd broke the Seahawks record for loudest outdoor stadium in the world. Could have and probably should have been much worse, hopefully he will learn from that environment.
  • j_crazy
    Ironman92;1517328 wrote:St Louis 31
    Houston 6
    Just got back from this game. Houston is bad. All around bad.
  • Iliketurtles
    j_crazy;1517457 wrote:Just got back from this game. Houston is bad. All around bad.
    Except for Foster right haha?

    Also Blackmon going off in Denver 10 catches for 129 yards already... really wish megatron would have just been inactive again so I would have kept Blackmon in my lineup.
  • robj55
    j_crazy;1517457 wrote:Just got back from this game. Houston is bad. All around bad.
    Did they really cheer when Shaub got hurt?
  • like_that
    Ironman92;1517279 wrote:It's what I do.

    I figured it's better to be miserable on this thread to myself as opposed to trolling the Browns thread.
    I can respect that.
  • like_that
    Also when did the random NFL thread turn into the ironman steelers commentator thread?
  • SportsAndLady
    like_that;1517468 wrote:Also when did the random NFL thread turn into the ironman steelers negative nancy commentator thread?
    Fixed
  • Tigerfan00
    like_that;1517468 wrote:Also when did the random NFL thread turn into the ironman steelers commentator thread?
    If he started a Steelers thread he would be the only one commenting.
  • mhs95_06
    Ironman92;1517398 wrote:Pressure by Jones (love this rookie) and interception by Timmons. Take that Rex you piece of crap look at me coach.

    Steelers are off the schnide.
    I think its Schnied:

    [h=1]OFF THE SCHNEID
    It’s time to get OFF THE SCHNEID.
    What is OFF THE SCHNEID? It’s a figure of speech that means to end a losing streak — to stop a long run of negatives with a positive.

    To understand how one gets OFF THE SCHNEID, one has to understand what “the schneid” is. Here is a definition from the smart folks at     www.word-detective.com:
    To be “on the schneid” means to be on a losing streak, racking up a series of losing, and especially scoreless, games. “Schneid” is actually short for “schneider,” a term originally used in the card game of gin, meaning to prevent an opponent from scoring any points. “Schneider” entered the vocabulary of gin from German (probably via Yiddish), where it means “tailor.” Apparently the original sense was that if you were “schneidered” in gin you were “cut” (as if by a tailor) from contention in the game. “Schneider” first appeared in the literature of card-playing about 1886, but the shortened form “schneid” used in other sports is probably of fairly recent vintage.[/h]
  • hasbeen
    Tom Brady is unreal.
  • Rotinaj
    hasbeen;1517493 wrote:Tom Brady is unreal.
    Ehh, I think he would be a solid backup to Weeden.
  • Ironman92
    mhs95_06;1517490 wrote:I think its Schnied:

    [h=1]OFF THE SCHNEID
    It’s time to get OFF THE SCHNEID.
    What is OFF THE SCHNEID? It’s a figure of speech that means to end a losing streak — to stop a long run of negatives with a positive.

    To understand how one gets OFF THE SCHNEID, one has to understand what “the schneid” is. Here is a definition from the smart folks at     www.word-detective.com:
    To be “on the schneid” means to be on a losing streak, racking up a series of losing, and especially scoreless, games. “Schneid” is actually short for “schneider,” a term originally used in the card game of gin, meaning to prevent an opponent from scoring any points. “Schneider” entered the vocabulary of gin from German (probably via Yiddish), where it means “tailor.” Apparently the original sense was that if you were “schneidered” in gin you were “cut” (as if by a tailor) from contention in the game. “Schneider” first appeared in the literature of card-playing about 1886, but the shortened form “schneid” used in other sports is probably of fairly recent vintage.[/h]
    I tried it two was and autocorrect didn't help and I was too lazy to check. Thanks
  • Ironman92
    Tigerfan00;1517475 wrote:If he started a Steelers thread he would be the only one commenting.
    The Steelers aren't relevant and me doing an individual thread with me having 31 of the 36 posts.....

    If I'm not bothering anyone I'll just continue to do this unless they become relevant again.
  • Ironman92
    like_that;1517468 wrote:Also when did the random NFL thread turn into the ironman steelers commentator thread?
    Today around 5 after 1:00 pm.
  • Ironman92
    Ironman92;1517230 wrote:Winless Steelers vs the lucky Jets and Rex Ryan....I see no way this can be too good but maybe it's one of those against all things normal games.

    Steelers with zero interceptions, zero fumble recoveries....but are 30th in sacks
    Ha!
  • Iliketurtles
    Ironman92;1517501 wrote:The Steelers aren't relevant and me doing an individual thread with me having 31 of the 36 posts.....

    If I'm not bothering anyone I'll just continue to do this unless they become relevant again.
    You should have done it and one up darby by doing 67 consecutive posts.
  • Ironman92
    Iliketurtles;1517516 wrote:You should have done it and one up darby by doing 67 consecutive posts.
    Automatik gets in the way.
  • ts1227
    Ironman92;1517501 wrote:The Steelers aren't relevant and me doing an individual thread with me having 31 of the 36 posts.....

    If I'm not bothering anyone I'll just continue to do this unless they become relevant again.
    You weren't hurting anything, just ignore them
  • j_crazy
    robj55;1517466 wrote:Did they really cheer when Shaub got hurt?
    Yes.