Eagles @ Browns Game Thread

• ts1227

  

  SportsAndLady;1266041 wrote:Not surprised ts didn't understand that...he just likes to regulate, makes him feel like a man or something, idk.

  I read the post and don't make my decisions based off of an opinion I developed about the OP 2 years ago. CoA and like_that report shit like that, which is why nothing ever happens on stuff they report.
• like_that

  

  ts1227;1266029 wrote:You're going to be a very frustrated person if you call a post saying "it's one game" running amok, because no one in their right mind around here is going to moderate it.
  
  
  I think they both lose, you need a QB markedly better than either of them to overcome Shurmur's system.

  I am not calling it running amok. I am mocking him last year for trying to claim COA and I ran amok in Bengals threads, even though he couldn't provide any posts, because I only posted about 5 times in those threads. There is the backstory on that.
• like_that

  

  ts1227;1266049 wrote:I read the post and don't make my decisions based off of an opinion I developed about the OP 2 years ago. CoA and like_that report shit like that, which is why nothing ever happens on stuff they report.

  Also, I didn't report the post. Nice fail though. Seriously u don't need to regulate this thread. Us browns fans know how to self regulate. Let Wes take care of the browns threads, because you are already doing a shitty job. Thanks
• BR1986FB

  SportsAndLady;1266039 wrote:My "Boy Toy"?
  
  McCoy sucks..I know this. I'm not afraid to admit this. I've known that for a while now. Your obsession with Weeden is getting to the point that you can't call a spade a spade...that's why I feel sorry for you.

  No obsession with Weeden. You obviously have reading comprehension issues since I said early they played well enough to win but the rookie QB cost them. I didn't mention where Little fucked them over too in that they may have had their only TD drive if he catches that ball.
  
  I've known ALL along that Weeden would struggle and I've said it previously. Just because he sucked in his first game you don't give up on him. If he's playing like this in week 4 or 5 with no signs of improvement, yeah, bench him.
• SportsAndLady

  

  ts1227;1266049 wrote:I read the post and don't make my decisions based off of an opinion I developed about the OP 2 years ago. CoA and like_that report shit like that, which is why nothing ever happens on stuff they report.

  Pretttttty sure they don't report posts, so nice lie.
• SportsAndLady

  

  BR1986FB;1266055 wrote:No obsession with Weeden. You obviously have reading comprehension issues since I said early they played well enough to win but the rookie QB cost them. I didn't mention where Little fucked them over too in that they may have had their only TD drive if he catches that ball.
  
  I've known ALL along that Weeden would struggle and I've said it previously. Just because he sucked in his first game you don't give up on him. If he's playing like this in week 4 or 5 with no signs of improvement, yeah, bench him.

  You really need to see him play 4 or 5 games to realize he sucks? Did you not listen to myself, lhslep, and others tell you that he was terrible at Ok State when rushed in the pocket? That he completed 45% of his passes when he couldn't just dump it off on a bubble screen?
  
  Brandon Weeden will never be successful in the NFL, sooner you realize this and hope for a top pick so they can actually get an Andrew Luck or RG3 on this team, the better off you'll be.
  
  Brandon Weeden's absolute highest ceiling is leading this team to an 8-8 record; yikes.
• said_aouita

  

  Crimson streak;1266033 wrote:I'm not disagreeing with that also. I just think If McCoy was playing today they would have won but going forward you still gotta give weedon another shot. You don't give up on a first rd pick after 1 game

  Give Weeden another shot around week six.
• BR1986FB

  SportsAndLady;1266069 wrote:You really need to see him play 4 or 5 games to realize he sucks? Did you not listen to myself, lhslep, and others tell you that he was terrible at Ok State when rushed in the pocket? That he completed 45% of his passes when he couldn't just dump it off on a bubble screen?

  All the McCoy nuthuggers got to watch that shitbag start 21 games so, yeah...I'd like to see a larger sample size of Weeden before declaring him trash. He may very well suck but why would I give a fuck about your "QB expertise?" Seriously? Last time I checked, you weren't a scout and were just an Average Everyday Joe like the rest of us.
• said_aouita

  

  BR1986FB;1266079 wrote:All the McCoy nuthuggers got to watch that shitbag start 21 games so, yeah...I'd like to see a larger sample size of Weeden before declaring him trash.

  Maybe I'm wrong but I thought they were saying this years O line is a lot better than last seasons?
• BR1986FB

  said_aouita;1266083 wrote:Maybe I'm wrong but I thought they were saying this years O line is a lot better than last seasons?

  Suppose to be but it didn't show today. A 'good" O-Line can usually run the ball.
• SportsAndLady

  

  BR1986FB;1266079 wrote:All the McCoy nuthuggers got to watch that shitbag start 21 games so, yeah...I'd like to see a larger sample size of Weeden before declaring him trash. He may very well suck but why would I give a fuck about your "QB expertise?" Seriously? Last time I checked, you weren't a scout and were just an Average Everyday Joe like the rest of us.

  Because when a LOT of "average everyday joes" know a 1st round pick is going to suck, you know he's probably going to suck. Now yes, he could surprise and prove them all wrong, but 12/35 118 yards 4 INTs is just fucking awful.
  
  Oh and there is literally no such thing as "McCoy nuthuggers" You're just making that up to cover up how bad your favorite shit QB is.
• BR1986FB

  SportsAndLady;1266087 wrote: Oh and there is literally no such thing as "McCoy nuthuggers" You're just making that up to cover up how bad your favorite shit QB is.

  LOL, yeah right. There weren't ANY fans who thought McCoy should be the starter this year? Any? :rolleyes: And there aren't any threads running over on the OBR with titles like "With our defense, are we a playoff contender with Colt?"
• SportsAndLady

  

  BR1986FB;1266091 wrote:LOL, yeah right. There weren't ANY fans who thought McCoy should be the starter this year? Any? :rolleyes:

  I mean I don't brainwash myself with Cleveland radio (mostly because I have no source to listen to it...but also because those fans are hick retards that i don't want to hear the opinions of), but no one one here wanted McCoy. None of my friends wanted McCoy. Nobody on my facebook wanted McCoy. Even I was all for Weeden starting...because I know McCoy wasn't good; and while I was pretty sure Weeden would suck, I wasn't 100%. Yes, Im 100% sure now. Puke. Next.
• BR1986FB

  SportsAndLady;1266099 wrote:I mean I don't brainwash myself with Cleveland radio (mostly because I have no source to listen to it...but also because those fans are hick retards that i don't want to hear the opinions of), but no one one here wanted McCoy. None of my friends wanted McCoy. Nobody on my facebook wanted McCoy. Even I was all for Weeden starting...because I know McCoy wasn't good; and while I was pretty sure Weeden would suck, I wasn't 100%. Yes, Im 100% sure now. Puke. Next.

  Maybe nobody on YOUR Facebook wanted him. Start "liking" some links of Browns sites on there and you'll see how ridiculous it is. I'm not even referring to Cleveland sports talk. I haven't listened to that in months.
• SportsAndLady

  

  BR1986FB;1266102 wrote:Maybe nobody on YOUR Facebook wanted him. Start "liking" some links of Browns sites on there and you'll see how ridiculous it is. I'm not even referring to Cleveland sports talk. I haven't listened to that in months.

  Jesus BR...I just saw a post on Reddit where someone said you have to have an undergraduate degree to vote in the presidential election, doesn't mean there are "undergrad prerequisite nuthuggers" out there.
  
  You just sound so stupid when you actually say colt mccoy nuthugger.
• lhslep134

  

  BR1986FB;1266091 wrote:LOL, yeah right. There weren't ANY fans who thought McCoy should be the starter this year? Any? :rolleyes:

  I believe I have narrowed your logic down to this.
  
  Saying Weeden sucks=Thinking Colt McCoy should start=being a McCoy nuthugger
  
  What the f*ck is wrong with you? Seriously? If you want to vehemently defend Weeden's place as starting QB fine. But stop f*cking saying everyone who thinks McCoy would have played better or that McCoy should be playing is AUTOMATICALLY A "MCCOY NUTHUGGER" OR MCCOY IS SOMEONE'S "BOY TOY"
  
  It's seriously to the point that I have to go out of my to call you out on it. It's getting ridiculous. Weeden f*cking blew d*ck under pressure which is exactly the concern of not only some on here, but the scouts who wrote the analysis that we cited, and why we shouldn't play him.
  
  Take the 1st round label off of Weeden and you have this:
  
  28 year old rookie who was handed a gem of a defensive performance and botched it with a 44 passer rating of a game, with poor throws for 2 easy touchdowns. Not someone I want leading my offense, sorry.
• BR1986FB

  lhslep134;1266111 wrote: Take the 1st round label off of Weeden and you have this:
  
  28 year old rookie who was handed a gem of a defensive performance and botched it with a 44 passer rating of a game, with poor throws for 2 easy touchdowns. Not someone I want leading my offense, sorry.

  Don't disagree with this. Never said this wasn't the case. He sucked. I never defended his performance today but I WILL defend a QB, regardless of how BAD his play was, from IDIOTS who think he should be benched after his FIRST NFL start.
• SportsAndLady

  

  lhslep134;1266111 wrote:I believe I have narrowed your logic down to this.
  
  Saying Weeden sucks=Thinking Colt McCoy should start=being a McCoy nuthugger
  
  What the f*ck is wrong with you? Seriously? If you want to vehemently defend Weeden's place as starting QB fine. But stop f*cking saying everyone who thinks McCoy would have played better or that McCoy should be playing is AUTOMATICALLY A "MCCOY NUTHUGGER" OR MCCOY IS SOMEONE'S "BOY TOY"
  
  It's seriously to the point that I have to go out of my to call you out on it. It's getting ridiculous. Weeden f*cking blew d*ck under pressure which is exactly the concern of not only some on here, but the scouts who wrote the analysis that we cited, and why we shouldn't play him.
  
  Take the 1st round label off of Weeden and you have this:
  
  28 year old rookie who was handed a gem of a defensive performance and botched it with a 44 passer rating of a game, with poor throws for 2 easy touchdowns. Not someone I want leading my offense, sorry.

  Yep. Nailed it. Reps to you.
• SportsAndLady

  

  BR1986FB;1266114 wrote:Don't disagree with this. Never said this wasn't the case. He sucked. I never defended his performance today but I WILL defend a QB, regardless of how BAD his play was, from idiots who think he should be benched after his FIRST NFL start.

  It's not necessarily that we think he should be benched, more-so that we want a better QB to be on this team. One that isn't currently on our roster.
• BR1986FB

  SportsAndLady;1266117 wrote:It's not necessarily that we think he should be benched, more-so that we want a better QB to be on this team. One that isn't currently on our roster.

  Well, too bad...guess you're gonna have to "suffer" for another year. :laugh: Richardson looked pretty shitty today. Hope they get rid of him too.
• Footwedge

  I didn't have problem with the Browns naming Weedon the starter before the preseason started. I had a real problem the way he stunk out the joint in those preseason games...whereby McCoy played really well.
  
  Then I had a heated discussion with those that said "no matter what, Weedon must play". And I responded that the "best player should play, depending on who shows themselves to be the best player". And the shit I got for saying that. Well sorry prople, this is the N F fuckin L and not the Bantom League. I don't care wherr you are drafted. or how much money you make. The best players play...even it entails a bad player versus a much worse player.
  
  Today, Mike Vick single handedly gave the game to the Browns. Except our idiot fukkin coach refused to pull the plug on a guy who probably hung up the worst qb rating in the last 10 years.
  
  
  Pathetic. We should be 1-0...but the "know-it-alls" have seen to it that we are 0-1.
• SportsAndLady

  

  BR1986FB;1266120 wrote:Well, too bad...guess you're gonna have to "suffer" for another year. :laugh: Richardson looked pretty shitty today. Hope they get rid of him too.

  I'm just really glad you're happy with Weeden as our starting QB. That makes you look incredibly smart & intelligent lolololol
• BR1986FB

  SportsAndLady;1266129 wrote:I'm just really glad you're happy with Weeden as our starting QB. That makes you look incredibly smart & intelligent lolololol

  Who is "happy?" I felt liked I'd been kicked in the stomach after that loss.
  
  They know McCoy's not the answer. Who else ya got besides Thad Lewis? Weeden's your option. If he continues to look like shit I'm sure the new regime will bring in their guy in 2013. Nothing about being "happy" but I DO want to see what he can do over a season since they did burn a 1st on him.
• Mulva

  

  I'm more impressed that the game was even close than I am upset about anything.
• Footwedge

  Browns gained a whopping 210 yards today which accounted for exactly zero points on the board. Every FG was set up by a turnover. Defense 16, Offense zero. Anyone that thinks the Browns lose with McCoy playing the second half need to scrub out their bong.
  
  This is all on Shurmer...a gutless swine who really doesn't care about winning.