Archive

NBA Finals: Miami Heat vs Oklahoma City Thunder

  • wghfan
    LEBRON JAMES IS A FUCKIN PUSSY !!
  • tk421
    http://www.nba.com/analysis/rules_history.html
    2003-04
    • For a 20-Second Timeout, the official shall instruct the timer to record the 20 seconds and to inform him when the time has expired.
    • If a team calls a 20-second timeout because one of its players is injured and, at the expiration of the 20-second timeout limit, play is unable to resume due to that player's injury, a full timeout will be charged to that team and 20-second timeout returned.
    • The 24-second clock shall remain the same as when play was interrupted or reset to 5 seconds, whichever is greater, any time on jump balls retained by the offensive team as the result of a held ball caused by the defense.
    It's been a rule for a long while now.
  • wes_mantooth
    As of now, would you consider OKC chokers or just inexperienced? I believe they are the better team from top to bottom....just curious. Letting games slip away an awful lot this series.
  • Laley23
    chicago510;1205688 wrote:Literally makes no sense. Hey they don't have enough time to shoot, so lets give em 4 free seconds?!
    All I could see is if you have a jumpball less than a second, giving them a full second. Even that makes NO sense, but its better than 4 free fucking second lol. Dumb as fuck rule.
  • ernest_t_bass
    tk421;1205692 wrote:http://www.nba.com/analysis/rules_history.html



    It's been a rule for a long while now.

    NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOPO
  • Pick6
    mhs95_06;1205685 wrote:The major failure here was not the rules, but a player not knowing them in a critical situation. Way worse than Donovan McNabb!
    way worse? Hardly anybody on here knew the rule. And its a stupid rule regardless. Why reward the offense?
  • robj55
    wes_mantooth;1205694 wrote:As of now, would you consider OKC chokers or just inexperienced? I believe they are the better team from top to bottom....just curious. Letting games slip away an awful lot this series.
    They are young, and Miami is a better team. OKC is a better offensive team but Miami has stars that will do everything to help you win, not just score. Durant with 2 boards, are you kidding me?
  • Pick6
    wes_mantooth;1205694 wrote:As of now, would you consider OKC chokers or just inexperienced? I believe they are the better team from top to bottom....just curious. Letting games slip away an awful lot this series.
    Inexperienced. Not only players, but coaching as well. Miami might win it this year, but OKC has shown great improvement each year. Next year they will take what they have learned from this experience and apply it.
  • Tiger2003
    robj55;1205698 wrote:They are young, and Miami is a better team. OKC is a better offensive team but Miami has stars that will do everything to help you win, not just score. Durant with 2 boards, are you kidding me?

    Were the Mavs the better team last year?
  • wes_mantooth
    robj55;1205698 wrote:They are young, and Miami is a better team. OKC is a better offensive team but Miami has stars that will do everything to help you win, not just score. Durant with 2 boards, are you kidding me?
    eh, I don't think so. I mean...i think they have the better big three, but the rest of their team is garbage other than MVP candidate Joel Anthony
  • DeyDurkie5
    robj55;1205698 wrote:They are young, and Miami is a better team. OKC is a better offensive team but Miami has stars that will do everything to help you win, not just score. Durant with 2 boards, are you kidding me?
    OKC is the better all around team. They have just made stupid ass mistakes that the heat haven't. Also, the refs have given the heat the series.
  • wildcats20
    Tiger2003;1205700 wrote:Were the Mavs the better team last year?
    The better team ALWAYS wins. Don't you remember?!?
  • Automatik
    Tiger2003;1205700 wrote:Were the Mavs the better team last year?
    I think the answer you're looking for is, "Yes."
  • robj55
    Tiger2003;1205700 wrote:Were the Mavs the better team last year?
    Imo no, but they had a perfect style to beat the Heat, the zone defense and the ball movement. OKC has the shooters but they don't have the ball movement. I said before the series that OKC was a better match up for the Heat than the Spurs, but a lot of people only thought that Miami didn't match up well with them which obviously isn't the case.
  • Tiger2003
    wildcats20;1205704 wrote:The better team ALWAYS wins. Don't you remember?!?

    Oh yes.
  • sleeper
    The Miami Refs in 5.
  • Tiger2003
    robj55;1205706 wrote:Imo no, but they had a perfect style to beat the Heat, the zone defense and the ball movement. OKC has the shooters but they don't have the ball movement. I said before the series that OKC was a better match up for the Heat than the Spurs, but a lot of people only thought that Miami didn't match up well with them which obviously isn't the case.

    Miami matched up perfect when it is 8 on 5.
  • wes_mantooth
    oh shit....here we go...

    https://twitter.com/HammerNation19/status/215288944387043328/photo/1
  • robj55
    wes_mantooth;1205702 wrote:eh, I don't think so. I mean...i think they have the better big three, but the rest of their team is garbage other than MVP candidate Joel Anthony
    Not true at all, Chalmers, a healthy Mike Miller is a really good role player, Battier is a great role player, James Jones can shoot the piss out of the ball, Udonis Haslem is a warrior and is similar to a Nick Collison but better. People overrated OKC's depth because of Harden, who hasn't played well as we all know.
  • karen lotz
    wes_mantooth;1205702 wrote:eh, I don't think so. I mean...i think they have the better big three, but the rest of their team is garbage other than MVP candidate Joel Anthony

    Miami's others have been better than okc's especially tonight. Collison was the third best player for the Thunder.
  • wes_mantooth
    robj55;1205711 wrote:Not true at all, Chalmers, a healthy Mike Miller is a really good role player, Battier is a great role player, James Jones can shoot the piss out of the ball, Udonis Haslem is a warrior and is similar to a Nick Collison but better. People overrated OKC's depth because of Harden, who hasn't played well as we all know.
    lol...no way.
  • Pick6
    robj55;1205711 wrote:Not true at all, Chalmers, a healthy Mike Miller is a really good role player, Battier is a great role player, James Jones can shoot the piss out of the ball, Udonis Haslem is a warrior and is similar to a Nick Collison but better. People overrated OKC's depth because of Harden, who hasn't played well as we all know.
    Haslem isnt better than Collison. Mike Miller hasn't done shit this series. Chalmers has stepped up.
  • robj55
    OKC's depth has been overrated all along, Derek Fisher? They have two quality subs in Collison and Harden(who is basically a starter). They don't use guys like Cook who could help.
  • Tiger2003
    robj55;1205711 wrote:Not true at all, Chalmers, a healthy Mike Miller is a really good role player, Battier is a great role player, James Jones can shoot the piss out of the ball, Udonis Haslem is a warrior and is similar to a Nick Collison but better. People overrated OKC's depth because of Harden, who hasn't played well as we all know.

    You are a fucking idiot. Get LBJ dick out of your mouth and take off the Heat blinders and you would see not only is OKC the better team but are getting screwed this whole series.
  • robj55
    Pick6;1205715 wrote:Haslem isnt better than Collison. Mike Miller hasn't done **** this series. Chalmers has stepped up.
    Haslem is most definitely a better play than Collison and has been throughout his career. Mike Miller averages 14, 5 and 3 for his career and shoots over 40% from 3, not his fault he has a wrecked back.