Columbus Ohio and the NBA?
-
Wooballhttp://www.cleveland.com/cavs/index.ssf/2012/05/obstacles_abound_as_columbus_a.html
What do you think? Could/Would Columbus support an NBA franchise? The arena/arena district would be a great venue, but would there be enough interest in the team w/ the Cavaliers being just a few hours up the road and on everyone's TV. Would folks in Cincinnati have any interest in an NBA franchise being closer to them in their own state? -
Commander of AwesomeWhich team would move? I honestly hope the NBA doesn't increase the number of teams.
-
derek bomarI'd love to have a team in Columbus and think as long as they won we could and would support the team. If they're the CBJ... they probably will get similar interest. Columbus doesn't support a loser. The CBJ would have sellouts every game if they won.
-
Commander of Awesome
Columbus supports you! lol lol lolderek bomar;1167665 wrote:I'd love to have a team in Columbus and think as long as they won we could and would support the team. If they're the CBJ... they probably will get similar interest. Columbus doesn't support a loser. The CBJ would have sellouts every game if they won. -
Wooball
The article says the NBA is not interested in expansion. Right now the Kings are the only team on the verge of a move, but can't imagine the Maloofs wanting to move to Columbus. Maybe if the city of Columbus hadn't moved the casino out of the arena district, you could have the Columbus Kings and Palms casino.Commander of Awesome;1167664 wrote:Which team would move? I honestly hope the NBA doesn't increase the number of teams. -
LJ
On the radio yesterday they were discussing it being the "planting of seeds" for a 5-10 year plan. So who knows. Whatever team gets into an arena battle and decides to move in the next 10 years?Commander of Awesome;1167664 wrote:Which team would move? I honestly hope the NBA doesn't increase the number of teams.
I think it would be cool to have an NBA team. I'm not particularly a fan of the NBA, but I would go to a few games per year. I'm just not sure they would have the constant support that they would need to be profitable. Like Derek said, if they were an instant winner, they would have a decent amount of support, but will that pay the bills? OSU Basketball can barely fill the Schott every night during B1G championship seasons. -
Commander of AwesomeDidn't the Kings start in Cincy wayy back in the day?
-
LJ
Think somewhere in Upstate NY, then Cincy, then somewhere in the Midwest (Kansas or Nebraska?) then Sacramento.Commander of Awesome;1167672 wrote:Didn't the Kings start in Cincy wayy back in the day?
They were talking about it on 610, but i wasn't paying close attention -
ernest_t_bass
My same thoughts before I even opened up the thread. We're like brothers now. I should add you to my signature.Commander of Awesome;1167664 wrote:Which team would move? I honestly hope the NBA doesn't increase the number of teams. -
Little Danny
The Kings were originally the Rochester Royals, then they moved to Cincinnati in the late 50s to become the Cincinnati Royals. The Royals stayed in Cincinnati until the early 70s, moved to Kansas City to become the basketball Kansas City Royals. Afterwards they moved to Sacremento and changed their mascot to the Kings.Commander of Awesome;1167672 wrote:Didn't the Kings start in Cincy wayy back in the day?
I think a win-win would be for the CBJ to move to Cleveland and for the Cavs to Columbus. -
Commander of Awesome
I disagree.Little Danny;1167701 wrote:I think a win-win would be for the CBJ to move to Cleveland and for the Cavs to Columbus. -
tmac23Changed name to Kansas City/Ohmaha Kings as to not be confused with the baseball team.Doubt it would be a good move with OSU sports and Blue Jackets hockey.
-
Fly4FunAll I want is a competent franchise whether it be hockey or basketball who cares. They don't have to be the best, but being competitive would be nice.
-
Y-Town SteelhoundColumbus just isn't a pro sports town and especially not a basketball town. I don't think the NBA would want two teams that close to each other in Ohio.
The Blue Jackets have decent attendance despite their lack of success but Columbus doesn't support the Crew or Clippers that well despite theirs. Not to mention the lack of interest in going to OSU basketball games. I don't think an NBA team would be right for Columbus despite how perfect Nationwide Arena would be for one. -
se-alum
CBJ had a streak of something like 60 consecutive sellouts at one point. Of course if you become a perennial loser, the fan support will wane. I think Columbus could easily support an NBA team.derek bomar;1167665 wrote:I'd love to have a team in Columbus and think as long as they won we could and would support the team. If they're the CBJ... they probably will get similar interest. Columbus doesn't support a loser. The CBJ would have sellouts every game if they won. -
Y-Town SteelhoundThe CBJ attendance is actually pretty good considering how bad the team has consistently been. It's the support of the Crew (won the cup as recently as 2008, usually a playoff team) and the Clippers (back to back AAA champions) that concerns me about another pro team in Cbus.
-
Fly4Fun
You're pointing to a soccer team and a Minor League ball club to say that columbus doesn't support professional sports? You can't be serious. Columbus does support the crew decently well, it's soccer. It's not exactly the hottest sport in America. And Columbus supports the Clippers as well as a minor league team can hope.Y-Town Steelhound;1167719 wrote:Columbus just isn't a pro sports town and especially not a basketball town. I don't think the NBA would want two teams that close to each other in Ohio.
The Blue Jackets have decent attendance despite their lack of success but Columbus doesn't support the Crew or Clippers that well despite theirs. Not to mention the lack of interest in going to OSU basketball games. I don't think an NBA team would be right for Columbus despite how perfect Nationwide Arena would be for one.
The whole "Columbus isn't a pro sports town" argument is a terrible one based on complete ignorance. Columbus has LOVED the Blue Jackets but after years of futility are losing fan support (that's kind of how sports work). It's not as if the Blue Jackets were a lower ranked play-off team. They just were NEVER a playoff team save 1 year. ONE year after being around for 12 is just embarassing considering the amount of high picks they should be getting. -
se-alum
I agree, the CBJ organization makes games enjoyable even when the team isn't that good. Let's be honest, soccer is soccer, do we really expect the Crew to have a big following?? As far as the Clippers, yea, they're technically a pro team, but there's really not much of a draw to it unless you're a big time baseball fan or just wanting to take the family out for a night. I think with an NBA team where you have a big time superstar draw, pretty much on a nightly basis, it would be a whole different situation.Y-Town Steelhound;1167738 wrote:The CBJ attendance is actually pretty good considering how bad the team has consistently been. It's the support of the Crew (won the cup as recently as 2008, usually a playoff team) and the Clippers (back to back AAA champions) that concerns me about another pro team in Cbus. -
ernest_t_bassWho would be pushed to the Western Conference if we added the Sac. Kings?
-
Fly4Fun
Milwaukee.ernest_t_bass;1167750 wrote:Who would be pushed to the Western Conference if we added the Sac. Kings? -
LJFly4Fun;1167746 wrote:You're pointing to a soccer team and a Minor League ball club to say that columbus doesn't support professional sports? You can't be serious. Columbus does support the crew decently well, it's soccer. It's not exactly the hottest sport in America. And Columbus supports the Clippers as well as a minor league team can hope.
The whole "Columbus isn't a pro sports town" argument is a terrible one based on complete ignorance. Columbus has LOVED the Blue Jackets but after years of futility are losing fan support (that's kind of how sports work). It's not as if the Blue Jackets were a lower ranked play-off team. They just were NEVER a playoff team save 1 year. ONE year after being around for 12 is just embarassing considering the amount of high picks they should be getting.
You both say "soccer blah blah blah" but the Crew is in the bottom 1/3 for attendence in the MLS. That's bad, no matter what way you try to spin it.se-alum;1167749 wrote:I agree, the CBJ organization makes games enjoyable even when the team isn't that good. Let's be honest, soccer is soccer, do we really expect the Crew to have a big following?? As far as the Clippers, yea, they're technically a pro team, but there's really not much of a draw to it unless you're a big time baseball fan or just wanting to take the family out for a night. I think with an NBA team where you have a big time superstar draw, pretty much on a nightly basis, it would be a whole different situation.
As for the Clippers, they are actually near the top for AAA attendence. -
LJCorrection, the Clippers are not just near the top, they were #2 in total attendence last year.
-
Gblocki agree with fly4fun...hockey is just not that popular of a sport...neither is soccer so im not sure i get the comparison. clippers have to be one of the top teams in attendance since the new stadium although that is just a guess. I also think the crew attendance this year will be very good..the only reason columbus isnt a pro sports town is because we dont have any pro sports teams.
-
OSHFly4Fun;1167746 wrote:You're pointing to a soccer team and a Minor League ball club to say that columbus doesn't support professional sports? You can't be serious. Columbus does support the crew decently well, it's soccer. It's not exactly the hottest sport in America. And Columbus supports the Clippers as well as a minor league team can hope.
The whole "Columbus isn't a pro sports town" argument is a terrible one based on complete ignorance. Columbus has LOVED the Blue Jackets but after years of futility are losing fan support (that's kind of how sports work). It's not as if the Blue Jackets were a lower ranked play-off team. They just were NEVER a playoff team save 1 year. ONE year after being around for 12 is just embarassing considering the amount of high picks they should be getting.se-alum;1167749 wrote:I agree, the CBJ organization makes games enjoyable even when the team isn't that good. Let's be honest, soccer is soccer, do we really expect the Crew to have a big following?? As far as the Clippers, yea, they're technically a pro team, but there's really not much of a draw to it unless you're a big time baseball fan or just wanting to take the family out for a night. I think with an NBA team where you have a big time superstar draw, pretty much on a nightly basis, it would be a whole different situation.
Really? What's the "facts" or "basis" in statements like these?Gblock;1167762 wrote:i agree with fly4fun...hockey is just not that popular of a sport...neither is soccer so im not sure i get the comparison. clippers have to be one of the top teams in attendance since the new stadium although that is just a guess. I also think the crew attendance this year will be very good..the only reason columbus isnt a pro sports town is because we dont have any pro sports teams.
How about the MLS is the third-highest attended league in the United States? It's only below football (number 1) and baseball (number 2). The MLS surpassed the NBA (number 4, now) and the NHL (number 5, now). So what exactly makes a "popular sport" now? The MLS is only getting more popular -- in most other places. The Crew have to do something to change their poor attendance marks. There is no reason why Columbus shouldn't be able to get more than 10,000-12,000 fans at the stadium. But that argument can be saved for another time.
I don't think the NBA would make it in Columbus. I think it'd be tough for two NBA teams in Ohio to make it -- no matter where this second one came in. The only way it COULD make it is if they operate the NBA/MLS/NHL teams in Columbus like the Seattle Seahawks/Sounders are marketed and operated. The Seahawks/Sounders are both owned and operated by the same group. So, if you work football marketing, you also market their soccer team. Most soccer organizations have 30-50 working in their marketing/operating...the Sounders have 140+. Columbus would have to do something similar, in my opinion. Get the teams working together. Get the marketing together. Offer great packages. Offer great promotional opportunities. Actually make the experience about the fans instead of about money-hungry rich professionals. -
Gblock
no way MLS is higher in attendance than NBAOSH;1167765 wrote:Really? What's the "facts" or "basis" in statements like these?
How about the MLS is the third-highest attended league in the United States? It's only below football (number 1) and baseball (number 2). The MLS surpassed the NBA (number 4, now) and the NHL (number 5, now). So what exactly makes a "popular sport" now? The MLS is only getting more popular -- in most other places. The Crew have to do something to change their poor attendance marks. There is no reason why Columbus shouldn't be able to get more than 10,000-12,000 fans at the stadium. But that argument can be saved for another time.
I don't think the NBA would make it in Columbus. I think it'd be tough for two NBA teams in Ohio to make it -- no matter where this second one came in. The only way it COULD make it is if they operate the NBA/MLS/NHL teams in Columbus like the Seattle Seahawks/Sounders are marketed and operated. The Seahawks/Sounders are both owned and operated by the same group. So, if you work football marketing, you also market their soccer team. Most soccer organizations have 30-50 working in their marketing/operating...the Sounders have 140+. Columbus would have to do something similar, in my opinion. Get the teams working together. Get the marketing together. Offer great packages. Offer great promotional opportunities. Actually make the experience about the fans instead of about money-hungry rich professionals.