AFC Championship Game - Baltimore Ravens at New England Patriots
-
LJseptember63;1062272 wrote:They didnt look at it. They ran the next play within the normal 45 second clock. That wouldnt be enough time to view replays of the catch/drop.
They did look at it. They didnt review it. They look at every play under 2 min -
like_that
Everyone SHUT THE FUCK UP! The all knowing LJ has spoken.LJ;1062279 wrote:They did look at it. They didnt review it. They look at every play under 2 min
/sarcasm -
Laley23
True.ts1227;1062271 wrote:Either way, it's after the play. All it would have changed is where NE took a knee, I think. Rudd's was before a whistle back in the day, no? -
mhs95_06
They probably did a quick review, but I'm saying take time to thoroughly consider it. Doesn't the ref on the field make the final decision when he goes to review? Need to let him decide that important of a play.Skyhook79;1062253 wrote:How do you know they didn't look at it and say he didn't complete the catch all the way thru no need for a review?
Great game though.
I know you have to prove possession by maintaining possession thru a collision with the ground, if you have one, but coming in and stripping it doesn't prove you didn't have valid possession after you took three steps with the ball on which the play should be over once you have possession beyond the plane. Now if that play happened at the 20 yd line, I'll bet they would rule a fumble! -
ts1227
They look at everything under 2:00. The one or two shots they saw (the ones we saw on TV) were pretty obvious, thus no reason to look at more or buzz the ref.september63;1062272 wrote:They didnt look at it. They ran the next play within the normal 45 second clock. That wouldnt be enough time to view replays of the catch/drop. -
ts1227
He is right this time though, lollike_that;1062280 wrote:Everyone SHUT THE FUCK UP! The all knowing LJ has spoken.
/sarcasm -
BR1986FBAt least Brady is honest (about sucking today)...
-
Laley23As for the TD/Drop. I didnt even think it was a question he dropped it/had it stripped. Isnt the stupid endzone rule that you gotta complete the catch or whatever?
-
NonBelichick said Jim I knew you'd be there, I didn't know we would be there referring to the Super Bowl.
Except the game is on NBC. -
like_that
They ran the next play right away. I have my doubts they had enough time to review the tape in order to make a decision.ts1227;1062285 wrote:He is right this time though, lol -
LJlike_that;1062280 wrote:Everyone SHUT THE FUCK UP! The all knowing LJ has spoken.
/sarcasm
Gee, thanks for the personal attack :rolleyes: -
Skyhook79
Rice only had 67 yds rushing on 22 carries and they had a great shot at winning and they would have won had Evans held on to the ball.landshark0731;1054214 wrote:Hey skyjack! Hope this helps if rice doesn't hit 100 they have little chance. Btw how did your teboner do this week? -
ts1227
They didn't rush the play by any means. Plus, all they had to look at was the one straight on view and it was obvious. It takes like 3 seconds.like_that;1062291 wrote:They ran the next play right away. I have my doubts they had enough time to review the tape in order to make a decision. -
Skyhook79
Repsbigdaddy2003;1054229 wrote:The Ravens offense will play better than it did today. If the D gets to Brady and ruffles his feathers it should be a close game. If the Pats blow them out I will get on here and eat crow but I don't see it happening. -
Mulva
Yes, and I didn't think there was much doubt about it either.Laley23;1062287 wrote:As for the TD/Drop. I didnt even think it was a question he dropped it/had it stripped. Isnt the stupid endzone rule that you gotta complete the catch or whatever? -
Laley23
Neither did Mike Perriera:Mulva;1062302 wrote:Yes, and I didn't think there was much doubt about it either.
ProFootballTalk ProFootballTalk
From @MikePereira via text on Evans non-catch: "Clearly not a catch. . . . No need to review it because it was clearly incomplete." -
justincredibleYeah, I'm not sure how anyone could think that was even close to a catch.
-
Laley23
and three steps? I saw one and the 2nd coming down as it was stripped. But I only watched the game replays. Didnt go back myself.justincredible;1062315 wrote:Yeah, I'm not sure how anyone could think that was even close to a catch. -
IggyPride00Still boggles my mind that Bill Belichek has literally turned into the greatest coach in NFL history after how his stint in Cleveland went.
5 Super Bowl appearances since 2001, 3 Titles (maybe soon to be 4) it is amazing. -
HeelzMan that sucks, that is all.
-
bigdaddy2003
Yes it does. Flacco shows up, most of the rest of the offense shows up, the D shows up, and Billy Cundiff ruins the day.Heelz;1062321 wrote:Man that sucks, that is all.
Also someone give George the Texans' fan reps for his prediction that the Patriots would win by 21+. -
mhs95_06I guess receivers need to be taught to spike it ASAP, then they get the TD!
-
landshark0731
Yea had a chance but didn't get close enough to 100. Cameron is an awful playcaller,hopefully Harbaugh let's him go. Pats did enough to win. Was a great game!Skyhook79;1062297 wrote:Rice only had 67 yds rushing on 22 carries and they had a great shot at winning and they would have won had Evans held on to the ball. -
BR1986FBThe thread was removed from the Ravens Scout.com message board but their fans were calling for a "bounty" on Cundiff and his family.
-
Zombaypirate
HAHAHAHAHA. That is great. I will sleep extra good tonight knowing the loss hurts them so bad they need to put a bounty on a kicker. Play better ball Baltimore don't blame the kicker. Brady did not have a great game and you still lost to a team with the 31st ranked defense.BR1986FB;1062407 wrote:The thread was removed from the Ravens Scout.com message board but their fans were calling for a "bounty" on Cundiff and his family.