Archive

Pit Bulls kill again

  • Al Bundy
    isadore;1742663 wrote:gosh a ruddies, showing the victims of pit bulls (who are mainly small children and the elderly) is a public service, the same as those warning ads on TV. The guilty are all those who come on this site and present their "cute" pit bull pictures and anecdotes. They are presenting the false picture of these killer dogs that will endanger more innocent human lives.
    I haven't seen anyone recommend leaving a small child alone with a pitbull (or any dog for that matter). Parents not watching their children leads to many problems.
  • isadore
    Al Bundy;1742664 wrote:I haven't seen anyone recommend leaving a small child alone with a pitbull (or any dog for that matter). Parents not watching their children leads to many problems.
    gosh a ruddies and having the type dog that kills far more people than any other type leads to dead children and oldsters.
  • O-Trap
    isadore;1742663 wrote:gosh a ruddies, showing the victims of pit bulls (who are mainly small children and the elderly) is a public service, the same as those warning ads on TV. The guilty are all those who come on this site and present their "cute" pit bull pictures and anecdotes. They are presenting the false picture of these killer dogs that will endanger more innocent human lives.
    Gosh a ruddies. Only someone who places his personal fears above intellectual honesty would use anecdotes for fear mongering. I hope you see the error of your ways and cease the senseless indictment against innocent victims of human negligence.
  • isadore
    O-Trap;1742707 wrote:Gosh a ruddies. Only someone who places his personal fears above intellectual honesty would use anecdotes for fear mongering. I hope you see the error of your ways and cease the senseless indictment against innocent victims of human negligence.
    the facts are that pit bulls kill more people by far than any other type dog. It is interesting that you see dogs as innocent victims rather than the children they kill.
  • O-Trap
    isadore;1742713 wrote:the facts are that pit bulls kill more people by far than any other type dog. It is interesting that you see dogs as innocent victims rather than the children they kill.
    Gosh a ruddies. Such persistence in fear mongering. I pray you one day overcome the irrational fear you harbor so adamantly.
  • isadore
    O-Trap;1742720 wrote:Gosh a ruddies. Such persistence in fear mongering. I pray you one day overcome the irrational fear you harbor so adamantly.
    Fact-Pit Bulls kill more people than any other type of dog. Fact-their preference as victims are small children and old people.
  • O-Trap
    isadore;1742778 wrote:Fact-Pit Bulls kill more people than any other type of dog. Fact-their preference as victims are small children and old people.
    Such twisting of facts to justify your fear-mongering.

    I'll be praying for you. I hope you can overcome your fears and stop the venomous hate that stems from them.
  • isadore
    O-Trap;1742780 wrote:Such twisting of facts to justify your fear-mongering.

    I'll be praying for you. I hope you can overcome your fears and stop the venomous hate that stems from them.
    gosh a ruddies, you will go so far to defend these killers as deny obvious truths. Wow now that is twisted.
  • Al Bundy
    isadore;1742781 wrote:gosh a ruddies, you will go so far to defend these killers as deny obvious truths. Wow now that is twisted.
    People have a better chance of being killed by a lightning strike than by a pitbull, but we don't want to let stats get in the way of your bias.
  • Spock
    Al Bundy;1742792 wrote:People have a better chance of being killed by a lightning strike than by a pitbull, but we don't want to let stats get in the way of your bias.
    One of those is preventable.
  • isadore
    Spock;1742797 wrote:One of those is preventable.
    so true, there are hundreds of other types of dogs, most with no history of killing people.
  • HitsRus
    About 20 people die from pit bull attacks per year.
    about 700 children die from drowning in their home swimming pool every year.
    1 million babies die every year because mom didn't want them.
    Gosh ariddies what do you think needs to be banned?
  • O-Trap
    isadore;1742781 wrote:gosh a ruddies, you will go so far to defend these killers as deny obvious truths. Wow now that is twisted.
    More fear mongering. I hope you conquer your irrational fear some day. It will open you up to a beautiful world with loving animals.
    isadore;1742800 wrote:so true, there are hundreds of other types of dogs, most with no history of killing people.
    Most dogs of all types have no history of aggression whatsoever. I hope that you will one day understand this.

    Peace to you.
    HitsRus;1742806 wrote:About 20 people die from pit bull attacks per year.
    Worth noting that the 20 dogs are called "pit bulls" because someone thought they looked like one. There are rarely any actual investigations into the breeds of the dogs that attack people, let alone the home environment of said animal.
  • isadore
    HitsRus;1742806 wrote:About 20 people die from pit bull attacks per year.
    about 700 children die from drowning in their home swimming pool every year.
    1 million babies die every year because mom didn't want them.
    Gosh ariddies what do you think needs to be banned?
    and gosh a ruddies, do you know how many people die of attacks from the large majority of dog types none, zero, nada, nil
    why have a dog that kills more than any other type dog? Ignorance, selfishness, indifference, arrogance
  • isadore
    O-Trap;1742818 wrote:More fear mongering. I hope you conquer your irrational fear some day. It will open you up to a beautiful world with loving animals.



    Most dogs of all types have no history of aggression whatsoever. I hope that you will one day understand this.

    Peace to you.



    Worth noting that the 20 dogs are called "pit bulls" because someone thought they looked like one. There are rarely any actual investigations into the breeds of the dogs that attack people, let alone the home environment of said animal.
    I hope you understand that most dog types have no history of killing any humans. And that is true no matter what environment in which they were raised, NONE, NADA, NIL
    And the identification are not by some passing individuals, they are from the neighbors and families of the dogs' owners who are most likely to be their victims.
  • HitsRus
    why have a dog that kills more than any other type dog?
    Well, if we ban pit bulls, then we'll have a new leader that now will kill more than any other type of dog....so that one should be banned next?......when do we stop?
    35X more children (not even including adults) die in home swimming pools...do we ban those? There is always a good reason to ban something if the danger factor is not zero, but then we wouldn't have much fun in life if we banned all things with any danger involved. It's really all about personal responsibility and accountability. Nanny state laws notwithstanding.
  • isadore
    HitsRus;1742841 wrote:Well, if we ban pit bulls, then we'll have a new leader that now will kill more than any other type of dog....so that one should be banned next?......when do we stop?
    35X more children (not even including adults) die in home swimming pools...do we ban those? There is always a good reason to ban something if the danger factor is not zero, but then we wouldn't have much fun in life if we banned all things with any danger involved. It's really all about personal responsibility and accountability. Nanny state laws notwithstanding.
    Gosh a ruddies it is so easy for some to be dismissive of the suffering of others. It is so easy to rave about personal responsibility and accountability when the victims are usually not the ones being irresponsible. And someone being held accountable does them no good when they dead. The majority of types of dogs have not killed people.
    If we found that one type swimming pool was involved in far more deaths than any other, we would be irresponsible not to discourage the construction of that type of pool
  • HitsRus
    It is so easy to rave about personal responsibility and accountability when the victims are usually not the ones being irresponsible. And someone being held accountable does them no good when they dead.
    You mean like those unborn babies? You are worried about 20 kids killed in a year, when a thousand die every DAY at the hands of their own mother who was too irresponsible to use birth control or control her own body. IT IS about responsibility and accountability in all that we do in life.... Whether we are talking about dogs, swimming pools, pregnancy, owning a gun, or driving a car etc etc etc. Life is dangerous and none of us are getting out of it alive. You have no right to cherry pick which dangerous activity should be banned and which should be allowed. I know you think you do, but you really don't.
    The majority of types of dogs have not killed people
    Gosh a ruddies it is so easy for some to be dismissive of the suffering of others.
    You mean like the others killed at the hands of other dogs. You are going to dismiss those because they didn't come at the hands of your favorite breed to hate?
  • isadore
    HitsRus;1742860 wrote:You mean like those unborn babies? You are worried about 20 kids killed in a year, when a thousand die every DAY at the hands of their own mother who was too irresponsible to use birth control or control her own body. IT IS about responsibility and accountability in all that we do in life.... Whether we are talking about dogs, swimming pools, pregnancy, owning a gun, or driving a car etc etc etc. Life is dangerous and none of us are getting out of it alive. You have no right to cherry pick which dangerous activity should be banned and which should be allowed. I know you think you do, but you really don't.



    You mean like the others killed at the hands of other dogs. You are going to dismiss those because they didn't come at the hands of your favorite breed to hate?
    Gosh a ruddies, there are legal limits placed on our actions for protection of our protection.
    a society looks at certain actions as being too dangerous and forbids them. Ownership of certain animals is banned because of the danger they impose. In Ohio: hyenas; gray wolves, excluding hybrids; lions; tigers; jaguars; leopards; cheetahs; cougars; bears; elephants; rhinoceroses; hippopotamuses; African wild dogs; Komodo dragons; alligators; crocodiles; caimans, excluding dwarf caimans; black-handed, white-bellied, brown-headed and black spider monkeys; common woolly monkeys; red, black and mantled howler monkeys and poisonous snaked, anacondas. So we have set the precedent.
    Notice for example some type monkeys are allowed and other forbidden, some types of snakes allowed other forbidden and one type of dog outlawed. Pit Bull are proven killers, In the last decade they killed more Ohioans than any of the above listed animals and any other type of dog.
  • O-Trap
    isadore;1742837 wrote:I hope you understand that most dog types have no history of killing any humans. And that is true no matter what environment in which they were raised, NONE, NADA, NIL
    And the identification are not by some passing individuals, they are from the neighbors and families of the dogs' owners who are most likely to be their victims.
    Most dogs of any breed or type have no history of attacking or killing humans.

    The identification is not by any experts and is not established via evidence. That means that those facts you so proudly wish to deal in are unsubstantiated, and thus, not facts.

    But I understand. It's not your fault. Irrational fears are so often the result of the dominant consciousness around a person as they grow up. Your fear mongering is fueled by the irrational fears you cannot help but harbor.

    I truly hope you are able to overcome these fears. It will open your eyes to a world of wonderful, furry friends.
  • isadore
    The identification spin is a subterfuge by those who want to continue to keep their killer dogs despite the risk. When the attacks take place they have the information about the killers is available from neighbors, family, vets who examine the dogs post killing and the owners themselves. The dogs kill and only the foolish, arrogant and selfish continue to own them.
  • HitsRus
    In your above post you listed all sorts of WILD animals. Dogs are DOMESTICATED. Pit bulls kill because they are trained to kill and that responsibility is on the owners. If you were to ban pit bulls, people that want that type of dog would simply train another type of dog to be viscous. No animal experts including the American Veterinary Association believes that pit bulls are inherently vicious or dangerous unless trained to be.
  • isadore
    HitsRus;1742880 wrote:In your above post you listed all sorts of WILD animals. Dogs are DOMESTICATED. Pit bulls kill because they are trained to kill and that responsibility is on the owners. If you were to ban pit bulls, people that want that type of dog would simply train another type of dog to be viscous. No animal experts including the American Veterinary Association believes that pit bulls are inherently vicious or dangerous unless trained to be.
    Pit bulls were breed to kill.

    Pit bulls were created by breeding bulldogs and terriers together to produce a dog that combined the gameness and agility of the terrier with the strength of the bulldog.In the United Kingdom, these dogs were used in blood sports such as bull-baiting, bear-baiting and **** fighting. Since dogfights were cheaper to organize and far easier to conceal from the law than bull or bear baits, blood sport proponents turned to pitting their dogs against each other instead. Dog fighting was used as both a blood sport (often involving gambling) and a way to continue to test the quality of their stock
  • O-Trap
    isadore;1742883 wrote:Pit bulls were breed to kill.

    Pit bulls were created by breeding bulldogs and terriers together to produce a dog that combined the gameness and agility of the terrier with the strength of the bulldog.In the United Kingdom, these dogs were used in blood sports such as bull-baiting, bear-baiting and **** fighting. Since dogfights were cheaper to organize and far easier to conceal from the law than bull or bear baits, blood sport proponents turned to pitting their dogs against each other instead. Dog fighting was used as both a blood sport (often involving gambling) and a way to continue to test the quality of their stock
    And any dog showing aggression toward any human being was immediately culled.

    I hope your irrational fear will one day be dispelled and that you will be able to cease the fear mongering.
  • isadore
    O-Trap;1742971 wrote:And any dog showing aggression toward any human being was immediately culled.

    I hope your irrational fear will one day be dispelled and that you will be able to cease the fear mongering.
    LOL for generations the exact opposite happened, they were breed to kill.