MIT Shooting/Bombing Suspect Manhunt - Suspect 1: DEAD, Suspect 2: In Custody
-
wildcats20So people are saying the scanner has said a plane into a building in Virginia.
-
Pick6
there is your problem. secondhand info.wildcats20;1429574 wrote:So people are saying the scanner has said a plane into a building in Virginia. -
purple_reinDid they discover the car that he drove off in?
-
gut
I assume they could just say "looked distressed/nervous, we thought it was a hostage situation". Or maybe Patriot Act.dlazz;1429573 wrote:If there's a deemed threat to national security in a house, they can probably PATRIOT Act them.
Isn't there a huge problem here if people refuse to be searched? Otherwise your sweep really isn't complete, or maybe they are relying on dogs. -
gut
Didn't think they had the right, maybe if they declared martial law.Pick6;1429572 wrote:no.
Rachel B ‏<s>@</s>RaediantPhoenix <small class="time"> 4h </small> For the record: SWAT asked me if I WANTED them to search my home. Did not force me, didn't come inside. Not searching illegally. <s>#</s>watertown
And for the record, that chick is a **** - not the time to be making a political statement. -
wildcats20Pick6;1429575 wrote:there is your problem. secondhand info.
Oh
http://www.fox43tv.com/dpps/news/local/fatal-cessna-plane-crash-in-jcc_6005055 -
Pick6
What was her political statement?gut;1429578 wrote:Didn't think they had the right, maybe if they declared martial law.
And for the record, that chick is a **** - not the time to be making a political statement. -
Pick6
article doesnt say anything at all about flying into a building.wildcats20;1429579 wrote:Oh
http://www.fox43tv.com/dpps/news/local/fatal-cessna-plane-crash-in-jcc_6005055 -
gut
She refused the search and then took to twitter to brag "not searching [me] illegally"...like she's proud of herself for being a "patriot"Pick6;1429580 wrote:What was her political statement?
At least that's how I read it the first time. I think I inferred the wrong tone, harmless -
Pick6
She also said if they wanted to come in, she would have let them.gut;1429582 wrote:She refused the search and then took to twitter to brag "not searching [me] illegally"...like she's proud of herself for being a "patriot" -
vball10setShootout in Watertown: good guys- 15 police hospitalized, bad guys- 1 dead, 1 on the run
also, I haven't heard anything regarding this, but when suspect #2 ran over his brother and drove through the line of police to escape, did anyone pursue him? if so, at what point did they lose him?? -
SportsAndLady
Seriously? That's what you got from that tweet? lmaogut;1429582 wrote:She refused the search and then took to twitter to brag "not searching [me] illegally"...like she's proud of herself for being a "patriot"
At least that's how I read it the first time. I think I inferred the wrong tone, harmless -
gut
With so many false reports and false starts the details are pretty sketchy, best I can remember was at some point he jumped out of the car and bolted between the houses. You know Boston, the houses are very close together. My guess is he put some distance between himself with the cops being very cautious with a well-armed suspect in a residential neighborhood.vball10set;1429586 wrote:Shootout in Watertown: good guys- 15 police hospitalized, bad guys- 1 dead, 1 on the run
also, I haven't heard anything regarding this, but when suspect #2 ran over his brother and drove through the line of police to escape, did anyone pursue him? if so, at what point did they lose him?? -
gut
I thought it was unusual that they didn't search if she had allowed them to (what the hell is a door-to-door search without actually searching?). So I assumed she refused, and then to say "not searching illegally" sounded like some libertarian with an inflated sense of self-pride.SportsAndLady;1429591 wrote:Seriously? That's what you got from that tweet? lmao -
WebFireI also find it strange he was able to get a clean getaway.
-
sportsfan24Wow from the sound of this press conffenece they have no clue were this guy is.
-
gorocks99City is open again, in home order lifted
-
Pick6
Amazing this 19 year old kid had 9000+ member of law enforcement who supposedly had him surrounded gets away, but the cop killer in LA with military/police experience couldnt get away in the mountains which much less people after him.WebFire;1429594 wrote:I also find it strange he was able to get a clean getaway. -
sherm03
I read it completely differently. I read it as they asked to search and didn't just come inside (whether or not she agreed to the search isn't the point), and then she made the statement that they are not illegally searching (or in other words, they aren't just barging in to each house).gut;1429593 wrote:I thought it was unusual that they didn't search if she had allowed them to (what the hell is a door-to-door search without actually searching?). So I assumed she refused, and then to say "not searching illegally" sounded like some libertarian with an inflated sense of self-pride. -
WebFire
Honestly, that's not how I read it.gut;1429593 wrote:I thought it was unusual that they didn't search if she had allowed them to (what the hell is a door-to-door search without actually searching?). So I assumed she refused, and then to say "not searching illegally" sounded like some libertarian with an inflated sense of self-pride. -
Pick6So they didnt rob the 7-11...interesting.
-
gut
Their perimeter was how many square miles? 300+? That's a massive number of homes, and last I heard several hours ago was they had searched about 2/3 of it.sportsfan24;1429596 wrote:Wow from the sound of this press conffenece they have no clue were this guy is. -
sportsfan24If the cities were on "lockdown" then how does kid get out of the city.....sounds like someone dropped the ball.
-
SportsAndLady
+1sherm03;1429600 wrote:I read it completely differently. I read it as they asked to search and didn't just come inside (whether or not she agreed to the search isn't the point), and then she made the statement that they are not illegally searching (or in other words, they aren't just barging in to each house). -
Heretic
I think how you read it is the same way that anyone on this site who DOESN'T spend too much time on our political forum (ie: under 2 minutes a day with their purpose there being to laugh at all the silly people is safe; more than that isn't) would read it.sherm03;1429600 wrote:I read it completely differently. I read it as they asked to search and didn't just come inside (whether or not she agreed to the search isn't the point), and then she made the statement that they are not illegally searching (or in other words, they aren't just barging in to each house).