2016 NCAA Tournament Discussion
-
SportsAndLady
Why isn't ku playing in Chicago? I read on here they should be there.ironman02;1786300 wrote:The South and East are very close. Great rewards for the #1 and #2 overall seeds.
Also, Kansas playing in the Louisville regional rather than Chicago is absurd. -
slingshot4everYeah, I was fully expecting KU in the Midwest. Jay Williams even brought it up with 1.5 hr flight vs 4 hours
-
ironman02
In the Sweet 16/Elite 8 they would play in Louisville since they got sent to the South rather than the Midwest.SportsAndLady;1786302 wrote:Why isn't ku playing in Chicago? I read on here they should be there. -
Spock
And he didironman02;1786294 wrote:Tune in to ESPN at 7. Bilas is gonna ROAST this selection committee. -
Spock
5th in ACCironman02;1786298 wrote:
Duke is the #13 team in the whole tournament? They finished 6th in the damn ACC!! -
Classyposter58
They have 5 wins against the top 50. How are you shockedCrimson streak;1786278 wrote:Cuse being in is a joke
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
Classyposter58
Rovell tweeted so many are mad because they bought up a ton of tickets for that regionSportsAndLady;1786302 wrote:Why isn't ku playing in Chicago? I read on here they should be there. -
ironman02
Actually, they finished 6th. Louisville wasn't eligible for post-season play.Spock;1786306 wrote:5th in ACC
I realize that Carolina, UVA, and Miami all obviously have a better body of work, but ND is #22 on the overall list by the committee. They basically have the same record as Duke, finished higher in the regular season standings, and beat Duke twice, yet they're a #6 seed in arguably the toughest bracket. Meanwhile, Duke is a 4 seed with a great draw once again. -
Classyposter58Great quotes I had to dig up after saying how MSU was a national title team in January during their 3 game losing streak
Azubuike24;1777422 wrote:Dude, having 3 possibly legit players is a talent problem. At least it is if you're claiming to be an elite team.
Again, there are teams you probably who you have never seen play, that man for man, blow MSU's talent out of the water. Look at some teams like California, LSU, UCLA, Connecticut, many others.Azubuike24;1779034 wrote:They can win 20 games in a row it doesn't change the fact that they don't have top 25 talent in college basketball.
We'll see in 2-3 years how many Spartans circa 2015-16 are in the NBA...Laley23;1779092 wrote:He isn't getting crushed for it because it's true.
MSU is severely lacking talent. Davis is probably their only NBA guy with Valentine having a shot. Coaching matters though and they have one of the greatest ever. Lsu has more talent, but they suck cause thier coach sucks. Florida state has more God given talent. Same with lots of teams...with bad coaches. -
Ironman92
Solid post, would read again.SportsAndLady;1786301 wrote:Kentucky deserves every bit of bad breaks they can get but they did brutally fucked. -
Ironman92
It would be great if they could win another title.ironman02;1786309 wrote:Actually, they finished 6th. Louisville wasn't eligible for post-season play.
I realize that Carolina, UVA, and Miami all obviously have a better body of work, but ND is #22 on the overall list by the committee. They basically have the same record as Duke, finished higher in the regular season standings, and beat Duke twice, yet they're a #6 seed in arguably the toughest bracket. Meanwhile, Duke is a 4 seed with a great draw once again. -
MontyBrunswickduke gonna lose to unc wilmington
-
Azubuike24My question is how does UK get a 4 and A&M a 3? Couldn't they have just switched them after today's game?
-
Laley23
You still have no idea what we were saying, do you?Classyposter58;1786312 wrote:Great quotes I had to dig up after saying how MSU was a national title team in January during their 3 game losing streak -
SpockESPN just showed everyone how to not do tv.
-
SportsAndLady
No no it wouldn't. But the committee once again gave them a cake walk to get there.Ironman92;1786315 wrote:It would be great if they could win another title. -
Azubuike24
He still thinks Denzel Valentine is an elite prospect.Laley23;1786321 wrote:You still have no idea what we were saying, do you? -
ironman02
They should have, but they wanted that IU/UK game so bad that they just couldn't help themselves.Azubuike24;1786320 wrote:My question is how does UK get a 4 and A&M a 3? Couldn't they have just switched them after today's game? -
ironman02
They're set up perfectly to make a run. If they win, though, I will lose my damn mind. You already knew that though. lolIronman92;1786315 wrote:It would be great if they could win another title. -
ts1227First weekend announcers:
FIRST FOUR
Tuesday: Andrew Catalon / Steve Lappas // Jamie Erdahl
Wednesday: Carter Blackburn / Mike Gminski // Jaime Maggio
THURSDAY/SATURDAY
Providence: Ian Eagle/Chris Webber/Len Elmore//Evan Washburn
Raleigh: Kevin Harlan/Reggie Miller/Dan Bonner//Lewis Johnson
Des Moines: Jim Nantz/Grant Hill/Bill Raftery//Tracy Wolfson
Denver: Andrew Catalon/Steve Lappas//Jamie Erdahl
FRIDAY/SUNDAY
St. Louis: Brian Anderson/Steve Smith//Dana Jacobson
Brooklyn: Verne Lundquist/Jim Spanarkel//Allie LaForce
Oklahoma City: Carter Blackburn/Mike Gminski//Jaime Maggio
Spokane: Spero Dedes/Doug Gottlieb//Ros Gold-Onwude -
Ironman92
This.....they factor entertainment more than fairness (this is not all surprising)....I think I would have UK and A&M both as 3's. ND a 4 or 5 and Duke a 6.ironman02;1786327 wrote:They should have, but they wanted that IU/UK game so bad that they just couldn't help themselves. -
Ironman92
Set up nicely but my hopes aren't up. I fully expect UNC Wilmington to be a tough outfit Duke. In that same regional I think Yale will be a tough out for Baylor in Rhode Island.ironman02;1786328 wrote:They're set up perfectly to make a run. If they win, though, I will lose my damn mind. You already knew that though. lol -
birddog23Duke did beat two #1 seeds already this year (UNC & UVA).
-
Classyposter58
Never said that. But this is a national championship level team, you and laley said they didn't have Top 25 talent. Izzo is good, he isn't that goodAzubuike24;1786326 wrote:He still thinks Denzel Valentine is an elite prospect.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
Azubuike24Define talent? I define it by future pros and recruiting rankings. Obviously that doesn't always correlate with how the college team plays. I'd still argue I could find 25 teams who have more future pros and/or higher rated overall recruiting on their current roster than MSU.