4 Play-Off Teams / Week to Week

• SportsAndLady

  

  Azubuike24;1760984 wrote:Temple?

  We are talking about the college football playoff. As in, top 4 teams in the country.
  
  And you wanna talk about temple as a good win?!
• Azubuike24

  

  So say Oklahoma State loses 3 games. Is that a good win for Baylor? What if Oklahoma loses 4 games? Is that a good win for Baylor? What if Temple loses 2 and they are to unbeaten Memphis and 1-loss Notre Dame?
  
  I'm not arguing Memphis. I'm really not. I'm arguing that including Baylor...is ridiculous, when their WHOLE RESUME is going to be 3 wins. And I'll bet that only 1 of those wins ends up being a team even ranked in the playoff top 15.
  
  I'm not at all advocating Memphis in the top 10 over any other unbeaten or possible conference champs. But Baylor simply hasn't done anything...
• lhslep134

  

  SportsAndLady;1760985 wrote:We are talking about the college football playoff. As in, top 4 teams in the country.
  
  And you wanna talk about temple as a good win?!

  If Temple wins out, with wins over Memphis and Houston, you don't think they'd be in the conversation?
• slingshot4ever

  lhslep134;1760987 wrote:If Temple wins out, with wins over Memphis and Houston, you don't think they'd be in the conversation?

  No
• Crimson streak

  

  lhslep134;1760987 wrote:If Temple wins out, with wins over Memphis and Houston, you don't think they'd be in the conversation?

  I could see it. They would more than likely have to beat Memphis twice as well. Would they get in? No but they would be easily top 10. Which as an ND fan I would love that lol
  
  
  Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
• Azubuike24

  

  I just want the answer as to why 13-0 Memphis is irrelevant but 12-0 Baylor is considered a playoff lock. Not anyone else, just Memphis vs Baylor.
• sportswizuhrd

  I heard Long say repeatedly that conference affiliation doesn't matter but then says in the end a conference championship is very important. With 5 big conferences, how does conference affiliation not matter?
  
  Also, another possible wrench in the system, IMO, if a 1 loss Florida beats an undefeated LSU in the SECCG, will LSU have any gripes outside of not being a conference champ? They did beat Florida before and would have better wins to show for it(Ole Miss, Florida, Alabama, A&M, Miss St compared to FSU, Georgia and Ole Miss).
• lhslep134

  

  Crimson streak;1760991 wrote:I could see it. They would more than likely have to beat Memphis twice as well. Would they get in? No but they would be easily top 10. Which as an ND fan I would love that lol
  
  
  Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  Doesn't really matter though, as I think Houston and Memphis are both better and won't lose to Temple.
• Crimson streak

  

  lhslep134;1760994 wrote:Doesn't really matter though, as I think Houston and Memphis are both better and won't lose to Temple.

  I agree. I was actually surprised at how well temple played Saturday. Better than I thought they would be. Even though the game should have been over in the first half if it wasn't for dumb redzone turnovers
  
  
  Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
• wildcats20

  

  Azubuike24;1760992 wrote:I just want the answer as to why 13-0 Memphis is irrelevant but 12-0 Baylor is considered a playoff lock. Not anyone else, just Memphis vs Baylor.

  I already told you.
  
  Conference affiliations will ALWAYS matter. You play in a power conference, you get he benefit of the doubt. You don't, you will get left out.
• Azubuike24

  

  Yet this contradicts the committee.
  
  ...and how does it account for a 1-loss Notre Dame over a 0-loss Memphis? Is not having a conference not a factor?
• SportsAndLady

  

  Azubuike24;1761000 wrote:Yet this contradicts the committee.
  
  ...and how does it account for a 1-loss Notre Dame over a 0-loss Memphis? Is not having a conference not a factor?

  It contradicts what the committee says on ESPN or to the public. You don't actually know how they think behind those doors. And if last year said anything, it's that conference affiliation matters (Baylor and TCU being left out over OSU despite probably having better "numbers").
• wildcats20

  

  Azubuike24;1761000 wrote:Yet this contradicts the committee.
  
  ...and how does it account for a 1-loss Notre Dame over a 0-loss Memphis? Is not having a conference not a factor?

  You think the everything the committee says is what they ACTUALLY do?
• wildcats20

  

  Also, Notre Dame has always been treated differently.
  
  They had their own damn clause in the BCS formula.
• slingshot4ever

  Azubuike24;1760992 wrote:I just want the answer as to why 13-0 Memphis is irrelevant but 12-0 Baylor is considered a playoff lock. Not anyone else, just Memphis vs Baylor.

  memphis is the only mid major with a shot. They win out and enough crazy shit happens, they have a shot.
• sherm03

  

  FatHobbit;1760915 wrote:Lol I'm not sure we disagree. Aren't you saying they're fucked?

  My bad if I misinterpreted. I took your post as saying that even if Baylor wins out, they'd be on the outside looking in. I don't think that's the case. I think if they win out, they are in. But I would say they're fucking because they won't end up undefeated. Worst thing that could happen to the Big 12 is Baylor dropping the games to OK State and OU, but beating TCU. Which would basically guarantee no Big 12 representation in the CFP.
  

  0311sdp;1760957 wrote:Notre Dame at # 5 is a bigger joke than Alabama at #4. Of the top 10 teams, other than Iowa who does ND beat head to head? No One. I have no problem with Clemson being #1 for now but they have only 1 more chance to get a quality win this season (which would give them only 2) so by the end of the year an unbeaten team out of the BIG 12 will have a much better resume than Clemson, who if they would happen to lose a game would be out.

  I think the reason why ND is #5 is because, if the consensus is that Clemson is #1, ND proved they were basically on the same level as Clemson. The fact they lost at Clemson...at night...in a hurricane...and had a shot at a 2pt conversion that would have tied it at the end...gives the impression that Clemson is only slightly better than ND. Right or wrong, I think that's why ND is so high.
  
  Now cue the cracks about ND's best win being a close loss and 10 year contract extensions...
• Con_Alma

  Azubuike24;1760984 wrote:Temple?

  Temple's defense is pretty good but their loss to Notre Dame will keep them out and I don't see them running the table against Memphis, Houston and Navy.
• SportsAndLady

  

  I don't have a problem with ND at 5. But I do think it'll be tough for them to get in even if they go without a loss. They'll need some teams to lose to set it up nicely for them. Like the big 12 scenario above where TCU loses to Baylor who loses to OU. And then OSU to beat Michigan state but then lose to Michigan.
  
  But lol @ people complaining about where Baylor is located. Give me a break. Their schedule is awful and they just lost their starting qb. They're right where they should be.
• Azubuike24

  

  Con_Alma;1761013 wrote:Temple's defense is pretty good but their loss to Notre Dame will keep them out and I don't see them running the table against Memphis, Houston and Navy.

  Nobody mentioned Temple as a playoff contender. My mention of them was more of, what if they go 10-3, losses to ND, Memphis and Memphis in the AAC title game. That's still a quality win. A win that is as good or better than Oklahoma or Oklahoma State would be...
• Con_Alma

  Azubuike24;1761020 wrote:Nobody mentioned Temple as a playoff contender. My mention of them was more of, what if they go 10-3, losses to ND, Memphis and Memphis in the AAC title game. That's still a quality win. A win that is as good or better than Oklahoma or Oklahoma State would be...

  I understand. I read the thread. I was simply adding to your posts with my thoughts. I wasn't contesting them.
  
  Depending on how Memphis finishes....a win against them could very well be a stronger win than what Ok or OK St has in front on them.
• Azubuike24

  

  It's cool. And I know I'm bringing up a lot of what ifs. There's going to be a lot more clarity after this weekend.
• Crimson streak

  

  Azubuike24;1761024 wrote:It's cool. And I know I'm bringing up a lot of what ifs. There's going to be a lot more clarity after this weekend.

  What Memphis needs is ole miss to win the SEC. Which won't happen bc ole miss isn't good
  
  
  Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
• Tiernan

  FatHobbit;1760916 wrote:Shit, this is the second time I've agreed with Tiernan today. The end is near

  Maybe some of you dumfuks will finally start to realize I'm the smartest dick swinger on this site. But of course that's like being the tallest midget in the circus.
• Tiernan

  1. Clemson
  2. AL
  3. OSU
  5. OK St
• FatHobbit

  

  Tiernan;1761862 wrote:1. Clemson
  2. AL
  3. OSU
  5. OK St

  Who is #4?