Archive

11/3: #4 Notre Dame (8-0) vs. Pittsburgh (4-4) [3:30 NBC]

  • sleeper
    The Equalizer;1311550 wrote:I don't go on other team's threads and stir the shit. When people come onto this thread to do it, then get the shit shoved down their throats when we pull out a W, they get what they get.
    I think the people you are talking about are getting the better end of the deal; it took ND 3 OTs to beat Pitt, who is one of the worst teams in college football.
  • vball10set
    Tiger2003;1311551 wrote:I told you to shut the hell up. You call yourself a ND fan an you shut the game off. GTFO
    reps!
  • Tiger2003
    The Equalizer;1311554 wrote:^case in point

    edit: not vball

    Case in point?


    Case in point you turned the game off?
  • sjmvsfscs08
    ND yards: 522
    Pitt yars: 308

    ND first downs: 34
    Pitt first downs: 13

    ND time of possession: 35min
    Pitt time of possession: 24min

    Who would've thought?
  • The Equalizer
    I will take a close win over a first loss anytime. I dont care who it's against. We're still in the picture and we have to trust that the players will use this as a wake up call and get back into last week's form. No amount of whining or complaining or "you had to fight to beat Pitt!" will change that. You were in a ballgame against the dreaded juggernaut indiana. It happens.
  • LJ
    The Equalizer;1311569 wrote:I will take a close win over a first loss anytime. I dont care who it's against. We're still in the picture and we have to trust that the players will use this as a wake up call and get back into last week's form. No amount of whining or complaining or "you had to fight to beat Pitt!" will change that. You were in a ballgame against the dreaded juggernaut indiana. It happens.
    Indiana scored junk td's at the end of a game where they were down 20 points
  • Tiger2003
    The Equalizer;1311569 wrote:I will take a close win over a first loss anytime. I dont care who it's against. We're still in the picture and we have to trust that the players will use this as a wake up call and get back into last week's form. No amount of whining or complaining or "you had to fight to beat Pitt!" will change that. You were in a ballgame against the dreaded juggernaut indiana. It happens.

    But I didn't turn the game off. I watched the whole Indiana vs OSU game. I didn't turn it off when it got close.
  • The Equalizer
    Yea, your team didn't play up to its standards and let an inferior opponent make it a game which you had to finally put away. Same thing tonight.

    ---

    Good for you and the neilson ratings. I'm still drinkin happy.
  • LJ
    The Equalizer;1311579 wrote:Yea, your team didn't play up to its standards and let an inferior opponent make it a game which you had to finally put away. Same thing tonight.

    ---

    Good for you and the neilson ratings. I'm still drinkin happy.

    Who are you talking to? Use the damn quote feature
  • Tiger2003
    The Equalizer;1311579 wrote:I'm still drinkin happy.

    I'm happy for you.
  • Tiger2003
    LJ;1311580 wrote:Who are you talking to? Use the damn quote feature

    He's talking to me.
  • The Equalizer
    Separated the comments with the --, you on top, the other guy on the bottom.

    And I'm sorry, I must have mistaken CFB for politics where you get to tell people what to do.
  • Crimson streak
    The Equalizer;1311579 wrote:Yea, your team didn't play up to its standards and let an inferior opponent make it a game which you had to finally put away. Same thing tonight.

    ---

    Good for you and the neilson ratings. I'm still drinkin happy.

    I'm drinking happy tonight too. Just keep winning things will take care of themselves and if they don't they don't
  • Tiger2003
    Well have a great night fellas. Congrats to the true ND fans on a 9-0 start. Like I have stated before its good for college football when ND is good.
  • The Equalizer
    Night Tiger, have a good one. ;)
  • LJ
    The Equalizer;1311584 wrote:Separated the comments with the --, you on top, the other guy on the bottom.

    And I'm sorry, I must have mistaken CFB for politics where you get to tell people what to do.
    I don't care what forum this is. I can't stand people that don't use the quote. It's stupid not to and it is a pain in the ass to read.

    As for the Indiana game. I was never worried. If you wanted a to have a real argument, you would talk about OSU having to score in the final seconds and get a 2 point conversion to get to OT with Purdue. But nah, you just saw the Indiana score at one point so you decided to go with that.

    Look, ND is undefeated, maybe you should worry about that, and not worry about other teams. I came in to make fun of Pitt, yet I then see some ND fan start bashing on OSU. Why did you need to bring up OSU? Because of Sleeper? Really?
  • The Equalizer
    I dont really give a fuck what grinds your gears

    I would rank purdue as a better team than indiana and put pitt on par with IU so I went with that analogy in showing good teams can have subpar nights that need saving.

    Not just because of sleeper but I'd be lying if I said I'm not enjoying that he didnt get the ending he wanted. He wasn't the only one in here for the sole purpose of rubbing in a bad game and now they got a little back.
  • LJ
    The Equalizer;1311593 wrote:I dont really give a fuck what grinds your gears

    I would rank purdue as a better team than indiana and put pitt on par with IU so I went with that analogy in showing good teams can have subpar nights that need saving.

    Not just because of sleeper but I'd be lying if I said I'm not enjoying that he didnt get the ending he wanted. He wasn't the only one in here for the sole purpose of rubbing in a bad game and now they got a little back.
    IU is most definitely better than Purdue. Also, Pitt lost to an FCS team this year, Indiana has not, so.... no.
  • Crimson streak
    LJ;1311596 wrote:IU is most definitely better than Purdue. Also, Pitt lost to an FCS team this year, Indiana has not, so.... no.

    To be fair Pitt I think had like 5-7 starters suspended for that game and there a completely different team since week one but still Pitt isn't very good
  • The Equalizer
    Okay I'll compromise and say I should have picked Purdue instead.
  • LJ
    Crimson streak;1311602 wrote:To be fair Pitt I think had like 5-7 starters suspended for that game and there a completely different team since week one but still Pitt isn't very good
    Completely different? Nah. Sunseri is still a bonehead.
  • Crimson streak
    LJ;1311608 wrote:Completely different? Nah. Sunseri is still a bonehead.

    Sunseri actually hasn't played bad at all this year 15 td's to 2 ints. But Pitt is still bad ugly ugly win
  • LJ
    Crimson streak;1311617 wrote:Sunseri actually hasn't played bad at all this year 15 td's to 2 ints. But Pitt is still bad ugly ugly win
    His INT's haven't been bad, but he just makes boneheaded decisions. I think it was the Cincy game he lofted the ball through the endzone and time ran out. Just shit like that. He is careful with the ball, but my god, he makes some stupid decisions.
  • killer_ewok
    Was it an impressive win? No. But they found a way to win. I will take it.
  • wildcats20
    killer_ewok;1311633 wrote:Was it an impressive win? No. But they found a way to win. I will take it.

    A win is a win is a win.