Ohio St @ Michigan St 3-4

• hoops23

  

  se-alum;1105474 wrote:Sully has gotten into the habit of waiting on the double team, instead of getting the ball and going. He needs to get the ball and make a quick move.

  Sully gets in way too deep under the basket near the baseline. He had two possessions in the 2nd half where he caught the ball and all he had to do was go up with it and lay it in... The defender was perfectly sealed off...
  
  Instead, he takes a power dribble, gets lost under the basket and has to force up junk.
• Big Gain

  Heretic;1106124 wrote:That's exactly how I felt. As well as about everyone I regularly (or occasionally) watch games with. Last year was what looked to be a perfect storm with no dominating teams, but OSU not seeming to have any real weaknesses that could be exploited. And then the Kentucky game happened...

  It took a perfect storm for Kentucky to beat Ohio State by TWO POINTS. It took their #5 option having THE best game of his career and Buford to shoot 2 of 16.
• Big Gain

  Skyhook79;1105988 wrote:Buford 2-16 smh.

  And if Buford was 3 of 16 he would have had a great game. BTW Craft was 0-5 in that game.
• GOONx19

  

  Big Gain;1106602 wrote:It took a perfect storm for Kentucky to beat Ohio State by TWO POINTS. It took their #5 option having THE best game of his career and Buford to shoot 2 of 16. BTW

  Take it easy, it's not like anybody said Kentucky throttled them. It was a great defensive game. I don't know if I'd ever call anything "a perfect storm" when UK had 4 different current/future NBA players on the team that played below their season averages in points, rebounds, and assists. Kentucky could have played much better than they did. The game just went down to the wire and at that point, with that many good players on the court, it was anybody's game.
• Skyhook79

  

  Big Gain;1106603 wrote:And if Buford was 3 of 16 he would have had a great game. BTW Craft was 0-5 in that game.

  Craft was a true Freshman then and not one of OSU's main offensive weapons and Buford wasn't 3-16 so it's moot point.
• Midstate01

  

  Skyhook79;1106659 wrote:Craft was a true Freshman then and not one of OSU's main offensive weapons and Buford wasn't 3-16 so it's moot point.

  
  He's still not one of their main offensive weapons.