Notre Dame 2012

• DeyDurkie5

  

  ts1227;1194311 wrote:Enough with the "you aren't relevant" bullshit.
  
  It's obvious that the program will always be "relevant" in a way due to the history and being the first name that comes to mind for Catholic schools. We all know the current on the field product isn't why, no reason to bring it up once a week. Stop beating a dead horse and talk about this season,.

  It hasn't been brought up in quiet some time. I saw sjmvsf make a false claim, and I called him out. Quit being a stuck up ass. Convos have disagreements. If anything, you should have infracted sjmsvs for calling me a fucking idiot. Nice fail all around chatter.
• sjmvsfscs08

  DeyDurkie5;1194444 wrote:It hasn't been brought up in quiet some time. I saw sjmvsf make a false claim, and I called him out. Quit being a stuck up ass. Convos have disagreements. If anything, you should have infracted sjmsvs for calling me a fucking idiot. Nice fail all around chatter.

  You show the world that you're a fucking idiot almost every time you post.
• ts1227

  

  DeyDurkie5;1194444 wrote:It hasn't been brought up in quiet some time. I saw sjmvsf make a false claim, and I called him out. Quit being a stuck up ass. Convos have disagreements. If anything, you should have infracted sjmsvs for calling me a fucking idiot. Nice fail all around chatter.

  I did, and then I made my post after that because it needed addressed too.
  
  Hope this helps.
• DeyDurkie5

  

  ts1227;1194699 wrote:I did, and then I made my post after that because it needed addressed too.
  
  Hope this helps.

  So now convo's that aren't in the basement have to be agreed upon by both parties(i.e. "i think notre dame is great" "oh so do i sjmvs, they are a splendid team who hustles hard" or else it's an infraction. Got it.
• ernest_t_bass

  

  sjmvsfscs08;1194537 wrote:You show the world that you're a fucking idiot almost every time you post.

  
  This is an obvious infraction.
• ts1227

  

  DeyDurkie5;1194703 wrote:So now convo's that aren't in the basement have to be agreed upon by both parties(i.e. "i think notre dame is great" "oh so do i sjmvs, they are a splendid team who hustles hard" or else it's an infraction. Got it.

  If that's what you got out of it, sure.
• DeyDurkie5

  

  ts1227;1194874 wrote:If that's what you got out of it, sure.

  What's the difference between what I said, and what Lotz said in this thread...http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?34613-Fatal-shooting-involving-%28former-%29-Auburn-football-players
• sleeper

  

  DeyDurkie5;1194879 wrote:What's the difference between what I said, and what Lotz said in this thread...http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?34613-Fatal-shooting-involving-(former-)-Auburn-football-players

  Durkie, there is no difference. Notre Dame is constantly coddled on this forum like no other. You can troll and bash OSU all day, but say that a 6-6 team sucks and you deserve to be banned.
  
  Cue the "oh noes sleeper is posting on a thread with Notre Dame in the title".
• DeyDurkie5

  

  sleeper;1195285 wrote:Durkie, there is no difference. Notre Dame is constantly coddled on this forum like no other. You can troll and bash OSU all day, but say that a 6-6 team sucks and you deserve to be banned.
  
  Cue the "oh noes sleeper is posting on a thread with Notre Dame in the title".

  I'm all for the rule changes, but this entire argument is a joke. there is literally no difference between the two.
• dlazz

  It would be a lot friendlier in here if you didn't bite at sleepers trolling.
• sleeper

  

  dlazz;1195339 wrote:It would be a lot friendlier in here if you didn't bite at sleepers trolling.

  Saying a 6-6 team sucks is not trolling. It's called reality. Only in South Bend is 6-6 good or admirable.
• dlazz

  No arguments here
• killer_ewok

  

  Notre Dame wasn't 6-6 so what does that have to do with this thread?
  
  Maybe if you kept it accurate and factual you wouldn't get as much grief? Just a thought.
• sleeper

  

  killer_ewok;1195376 wrote:Notre Dame wasn't 6-6 so what does that have to do with this thread?
  
  Maybe if you kept it accurate and factual you wouldn't get as much grief? Just a thought.

  Oh I'm sorry, 8-5 and blown out in a bowl games against an ACC team. :rolleyes:
  
  I don't see a difference.
• killer_ewok

  

  sleeper;1195384 wrote:
  I don't see a difference.

  
  LOL. You wouldn't. Actual facts wouldn't be as entertaining for you.
• sleeper

  

  killer_ewok;1195390 wrote:LOL. You wouldn't. Actual facts wouldn't be as entertaining for you.

  I've brought up actual facts before but Notre Dame fans just whine to the mods because let's be honest here; the facts about Notre Dame's program in the past 20 years are downright god awful. Why put the effort in when you will just label anything I post as trolling?
  
  8-5 is irrelevant. 6-6 is irrelevant. Anything more than 2 losses a year is irrelevant in college football in the modern era. Last year, Ohio State sucked. Why is Notre Dame the only team you aren't allowed to say "Notre Dame sucked"? Why so butt hurt?
• killer_ewok

  

  sleeper;1195395 wrote:I've brought up actual facts before but Notre Dame fans just whine to the mods because let's be honest here; the facts about Notre Dame's program in the past 20 years are downright god awful. Why put the effort in when you will just label anything I post as trolling?
  
  8-5 is irrelevant. 6-6 is irrelevant. Anything more than 2 losses a year is irrelevant in college football in the modern era. Last year, Ohio State sucked. Why is Notre Dame the only team you aren't allowed to say "Notre Dame sucked"? Why so butt hurt?

  
  Who said that you weren't allowed to say that? I simply corrected you when you said they were 6-6. If you still think they suck at 8-5...that's fine.
  
  We know ND has been down for years and aren't saying anything to the contrary. We know how you feel about them and that's fine. Not sure why we need frequent unnecessary reminders from you in regards to those. We know. We get it. You can say/think whatever but when a poster does it frequently (as you used to prior to rules being enforced) it comes off as obnoxious and is an eyesore on the threads. That's all.
• sleeper

  

  I'm providing the other side of the story. This is no different than when Karen and his ND buddies come into the OSU threads and bash the program. I don't mind it personally because defending OSU's recent and past record is pretty easy, all that I ask is that ND stop whining to the mods every 2 seconds because someone came and posted that an 8-5 ND team is terrible.
  
  Apparently ND fans don't like when OSU fans come on here and bash their program, but they have no problem with bashing OSU on their own threads. Don't talk shit if you can't back it up.
• killer_ewok

  

  sleeper;1195440 wrote:I'm providing the other side of the story. This is no different than when Karen and his ND buddies come into the OSU threads and bash the program. I don't mind it personally because defending OSU's recent and past record is pretty easy, all that I ask is that ND stop whining to the mods every 2 seconds because someone came and posted that an 8-5 ND team is terrible.
  
  Apparently ND fans don't like when OSU fans come on here and bash their program, but they have no problem with bashing OSU on their own threads. Don't talk shit if you can't back it up.

  
  I have no idea who whines to the mods so I can't help you there. And I don't bash OSU (even though I do not like them). I don't care for the trolling on ND threads and so I don't troll/bash OSU on their threads (or elsewhere for that matter). So basically you and the ND fan(s) you're talking about are gonna go 'round in circles on OSU and ND threads and those on both sides who aren't involved in that stuff are still gonna have to read all of the bashing/trolling?
  
  Well, that sucks. I thought that was what the basement was for.
• sleeper

  

  killer_ewok;1195452 wrote:I have no idea who whines to the mods so I can't help you there. And I don't bash OSU (even though I do not like them). I don't card for the trolling on ND threads and so I don't troll/bash OSU on their threads (or elsewhere for that matter). So basically you and the ND fan(s) you're talking about are gonna go 'round in circles on OSU and ND threads and those on both sides who aren't involved in that stuff are still gonna have to read all of the bashing/trolling?
  
  Well, that sucks.

  It doesn't go round in circles because the people who bash ND are banned for 3 months while the people who bash OSU are given moderator status. It's a joke and just furthers the problem. The fact that lotz is still a member on these forums is an absolute sham given the amount of warnings and infractions OSU fans have been given.
  
  Luckily for me, OSU actually wins games that matter while ND continues to roll in mediocrity that everyone outside of South Bend notices. No amount of bannings or infractions will change that fact. Enjoy!
• The Equalizer

  

  So trolls spewing the same old shit aside, anyone got any more recruiting news? That class sjmv put up looks very nice thus far.
• killer_ewok

  

  A little self-monitoring would go a long way for all of those involved. Then the mods would have no reason to get involved.
  
  Posting responsibly isn't that difficult.
• karen lotz

  

  The Equalizer;1195464 wrote:So trolls spewing the same old shit aside, anyone got any more recruiting news? That class sjmv put up looks very nice thus far.

  
  Most of the commits will be on campus this coming weekend along with a few targets including Anzalone. Some big visitors and a lot of 2014 guys next weekend as well for ND's camp.
• se-alum

  

  killer_ewok;1195465 wrote:A little self-monitoring would go a long way for all of those involved. Then the mods would have no reason to get involved.
  
  Posting responsibly isn't that difficult.

  Well said.
• karen lotz

  

  Discussing topics at hand isn't trolling or bashing. That shouldn't be a difficult concept to understand.