Who has a better source at Ohio State?

• vball10set

  LJ;993070 wrote:multiple days later and you are still crying like a little bitch.
  
  
  waaaah
  
  waaaah

  hahahaha...I believe you instigated this one, Napoleon
• LJ

  

  vball10set;993097 wrote:hahahaha...I believe you instigated this one, Napoleon

  Uh.....
  

  watch yourself now

  
  
  Not to mention the multiple posts like that you have made over the past few days. All you do is keep crying "waaah I got negative reps!! waaaaaah" Even your signature is crying
  "waaah I want to give positive reps, but I am gonna cry like a bitch when I get negative reps, wah wah wah"
• vball10set

  LJ;993108 wrote:Uh.....
  
  
  
  Not to mention the multiple posts like that you have made over the past few days. All you do is keep crying "waaah I got negative reps!! waaaaaah" Even your signature is crying
  "waaah I want to give positive reps, but I am gonna cry like a bitch when I get negative reps, wah wah wah"

  lmao--huh? it's not the what, it's the why, and I never bitched about the neg rep, but the "reason" you gave for giving it...my sig says it all :thumbup:
• LJ

  

  vball10set;993123 wrote:lmao--huh? it's not the what, it's the why, and I never bitched about the neg rep, but the "reason" you gave for giving it...my sig says it all :thumbup:

  Didn't know you were the rep rule maker.
  
  Give reps to someone for reposting an article = COOL!!!
  Get negs for something someone ACTUALLY posts= NOT COOL!!!
  
  :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
• vball10set

  LJ;993132 wrote:Didn't know you were the rep rule maker.
  
  Give reps to someone for reposting an article = COOL!!!
  Get negs for something someone ACTUALLY posts= NOT COOL!!!
  
  :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

  LJ, who said anything about rules? you didn't like what I posted, so you neg repped me--I thought the reason was a joke, so I sigged ya'....and COOL/NOT COOL? really??
• sleeper

  

  LJ's quickly obtaining C4F status. He's still about 1 trillion light years away from being as bad as C4F, but he's slowly approaching it.
• LJ

  

  sleeper;993175 wrote:LJ's quickly obtaining C4F status. He's still about 1 trillion light years away from being as bad as C4F, but he's slowly approaching it.

  Yeah ok mr "my source was right". Except that Gene Smith AND Earle Bruce AND Urban Meyer all say he wasn't even offered the job until Sunday morning :laugh:
• LJ

  

  vball10set;993136 wrote:LJ, who said anything about rules? you didn't like what I posted, so you neg repped me--I thought the reason was a joke, so I sigged ya'....and COOL/NOT COOL? really??

  In other words, you are crying about getting negged....
  
  and around and around you go....
• sleeper

  

  LJ;993185 wrote:Yeah ok mr "my source was right". Except that Gene Smith AND Earle Bruce AND Urban Meyer all say he wasn't even offered the job until Sunday morning :laugh:

  You were wrong, I was right. That is all people will remember from this thread and any subsequent threads that I post in. The only way to cure this problem is to admit defeat, but you continue to try and rationalize a position that is incorrect and has been proven so. Enjoy!
• vball10set

  LJ;993187 wrote:In other words, you are crying about getting negged....
  
  and around and around you go....

  damn, you really are a stump--what part of "it was the reason" don't you understand?? smh
• LJ

  

  vball10set;993191 wrote:damn, you really are a stump--what part of "it was the reason" don't you understand?? smh

  What part of "it's just as valid of a reason that you rep someone" don't you understand? Or has that point gone over your head mr "I've posted "reps" in over 100 threads alone"
• LJ

  

  sleeper;993189 wrote:You were wrong, I was right. That is all people will remember from this thread and any subsequent threads that I post in. The only way to cure this problem is to admit defeat, but you continue to try and rationalize a position that is incorrect and has been proven so. Enjoy!

  LOL
• Steel Valley Football

  I was one who posted that my source almost as close to the top as you can get said Meyer was coming here. I think I even said I would disclose my source once it happened.
• vball10set

  LJ;993193 wrote:What part of "it's just as valid of a reason that you rep someone" don't you understand? Or has that point gone over your head mr "I've posted "reps" in over 100 threads alone"

  I don't give a fuck what your reason was, I DIDN'T LIKE IT, and that's why I gave you shit.... and please, mr. mod, prove that "I've posted "reps" in over 100 threads alone"
  
  
  
  edit: and if you can't, then stfu
• WebFire

  Skyhook79;991731 wrote:
  
  
  sleepers new inside source and new best bud.

  Reps!
• vball10set

  ^^^lol--love it!!!
• LJ

  

  vball10set;993203 wrote:I don't give a fuck what your reason was, I DIDN'T LIKE IT, and that's why I gave you shit.... and please, mr. mod, prove that "I've posted "reps" in over 100 threads alone"
  
  
  
  edit: and if you can't, then stfu

  Easily, 1 moment
• vball10set

  LJ;993215 wrote:Easily, 1 moment

  remember, 100 threads
• DeyDurkie5

  

  vball10set;993218 wrote:remember, 100 threads

  aren't you like 50 vball?
• vball10set

  DeyDurkie5;993220 wrote:aren't you like 50 vball?

  lol--no, but what would that have to do with this conversation?
• DeyDurkie5

  

  vball10set;993223 wrote:lol--no, but what would that have to do with this conversation?

  a lot actually!
• LJ

  

  It's slowly uploading, but if you want to verify for yourself, search the term "reps" and the name "vball10set" under "search single content type"
• LJ

  

  
• LJ

  

  now I gotta go do black guy things....
• vball10set

  LJ;993230 wrote:It's slowly uploading, but if you want to verify for yourself, search the term "reps" and the name "vball10set" under "search single content type"

  I'll take your word for it, but is it really 100 different threads? if so, I'm going to rep myself!!!!