Archive

OK State in a tight one!

  • mhs95_06
    Somber weekend coming for Ok. St.
  • Ironman92
    Geaux Houston!!!
  • Ironman92
    killer_ewok;978781 wrote:Neil fuckin' Diamond

    Sweet Caroline...ghey, ghey, ghey
  • mhs95_06
    gorocks99;978768 wrote:GAME OVER. LSU-Alabama #2 is set.
    I wouldn't count on that!
  • Ironman92
    Too many men in the huddle?
  • Footwedge
    gorocks99;978768 wrote:GAME OVER. LSU-Alabama #2 is set.
    Will never happen. Look for the hairy Beavers to be back.
  • karen lotz
    Ironman92;978786 wrote:Too many men in the huddle?

    There was a flag on the play at least according to ESPN's graphic at the bottom of the screen.
  • Ironman92
    Ironman92;978705 wrote:OK State better realize this is National Championship or bust.

    Not a man
  • Jughead
    Oh my. That FG was good.
  • mhs95_06
    Ironman92;978721 wrote:Looked good but tv angle wasn't dead on

    Why don't they make the goal posts 15 feet higher?
    I think they are already 3 times as high over the crossbar as they were originally. Could they keep them square and plumb with 15 more feet? This would have been interesting if they were higher. Looked like the centerline of the ball was slightly inside the centerline of the upright, but was it enough to be able to deflect over the crossbar? I don't think so!
  • Footwedge
    karen lotz;978788 wrote:There was a flag on the play at least according to ESPN's graphic at the bottom of the screen.
    Ok State db clearly kicked the ball carrier in the end zone after the play was over.
  • karen lotz
    Footwedge;978796 wrote:Ok State db clearly kicked the ball carrier in the end zone after the play was over.

    thug
  • dazedconfused
    no way oregon makes up the .344 difference with usc, osu, and whichever awful team comes out of the south division
  • Footwedge
    dazedconfused;978802 wrote:no way oregon makes up the .344 difference with usc, osu, and whichever awful team comes out of the south division
    It will not be Alabama and LSU. Wom't happen. You don't win your league, then you don't go. Coaches and writers will override computers. Plus, there's a good chance LSU loses before the season ends.
  • mhs95_06
    How about a BCS NC game of Ga. vs. Ok. St.?
  • Jughead
    Footwedge;978813 wrote:It will not be Alabama and LSU. Wm't happen. You don't win your league, then you don't go. Coaches and writers will override computers. Plus, there's a good chance LSU loses before the season ends.
    False. Oklahoma lost the Big 12 Championship in 2003 and still went to lose to #2 LSU in the Nokia Sugar Bowl.

    I agree that this is the way it should be, but alas, it's not.
  • jordo212000
    Footwedge;978813 wrote:It will not be Alabama and LSU. Wom't happen. You don't win your league, then you don't go. Coaches and writers will override computers. Plus, there's a good chance LSU loses before the season ends.
    so... would it be a rematch of LSU - Oregon instead haha
  • dazedconfused
    i hate rematches in general in bowl games let alone in the national championship game. i also hate that alabama's loss to lsu is somehow considered better than oregon's loss to lsu
  • jordo212000
    dazedconfused;978843 wrote:i also hate that alabama's loss to lsu is somehow considered better than oregon's loss to lsu
    Yeah I'm not sure how Alabama's loss could ever be considered "good." They lost at home!
  • karen lotz
    How would you say Oregon's loss is better than Alabama's? They were dominated.
  • dazedconfused
    karen lotz;978852 wrote:How would you say Oregon's loss is better than Alabama's? They were dominated.
    how is alabama missing four field goals at home any different than a true freshmen fumbling on consecutive possessions and thus leading to two tds? they both gift-wrapped wins for lsu
  • Footwedge
    Jughead;978828 wrote:False. Oklahoma lost the Big 12 Championship in 2003 and still went to lose to #2 LSU in the Nokia Sugar Bowl.

    I agree that this is the way it should be, but alas, it's not.
    It will not happen...period. The Oklahoma debacle is the reason that it won't happen. The coaches over rode a one loss Michigan team and stuck in a 2 loss LSU team in 2006/07.
  • athlete37
    Footwedge;978870 wrote:It will not happen...period. The Oklahoma debacle is the reason that it won't happen. The coaches over rode a one loss Michigan team and stuck in a 2 loss LSU team in 2006/07.
    That explains why the Oklahoma 2003 deal happened 2 years after they did the same thing for Nebraska?? I guess the third time people are smarter?
  • Footwedge
    athlete37;978877 wrote:That explains why the Oklahoma 2003 deal happened 2 years after they did the same thing for Nebraska?? I guess the third time people are smarter?
    Yes...they are smarter now. I posted this above...no Michigan- Ohio State rematch. Especially....a rematch in the same division of the same conference...the coaches and writers won't let it happen.
  • Mulva
    karen lotz;978852 wrote:How would you say Oregon's loss is better than Alabama's? They were dominated.
    It wasn't a "better loss", but Oregon wasn't dominated at all. They killed themselves with turnovers.

    The 1st half of the game was very equal, and Oregon actually outgained LSU overall. If DeAnthony Thomas holds on to the ball in the 3rd quarter it's a totally different game.