Ohio Chatter DEV

Tobias Fünke

dlazz;974092 wrote:Their record when they played is irrelevant.

How? They had a winning record when Notre Dame played them. Just go ahead and say it, you had your facts wrong, again.

Tobias Fünke

killer_ewok;974112 wrote:How'd they get lucky against Nebraska? They lost to them 24-3.

hahahahaha

-Society-

karen lotz;974146 wrote:Time to stop responding to sleeper altogether. Let him start threads and then have he and dlazz reply to each other and have their "fun".

Calm down, bitch karen...it will be alright. Hahaha!!!11!!!!1!1!1111!!!one

dwccrew

Tobias Fünke;973752 wrote:Notre Dame played 10 bowl teams last year (not including USC which won eight games), and looks to play 8 this year. I don't think that's too bad.

I certainly don't think it's that bad when you compare Ohio State's scheduling with 1-9 Akron, 2-9 Colorado, and 1-9 Indiana.

Yeah but Indiana comes from the B1G, easily the best and deepest football conference in America. They'd be first place in the SEC East.

#Sleeper'd

Tobias Fünke

dwccrew;974833 wrote:Yeah but Indiana comes from the B1G, easily the best and deepest football conference in America. They'd be first place in the SEC East.

#Sleeper'd

I do have to rep this.

Hamp89

Being irrelevant is fun.

dlazz

Tobias Fünke;974309 wrote:How? They had a winning record when Notre Dame played them. Just go ahead and say it, you had your facts wrong, again.

Winning records of opponents carry more weight at the end of the season, not in the beginning or middle.

#commonsense

sleeper

killer_ewok;974133 wrote:You cited those 3 games and then stated they would be 5-5 instead of 8-2. You were talking as if that game was a win that should've been a loss.

LMAO at you trying to make up some excuse for your inaccurate info. LOL

They should have lost to Michigan as well. That's why the should be 5-5.

killer_ewok

sleeper;975037 wrote:They should have lost to Michigan as well. That's why the should be 5-5.

In other words, you were wrong and listed Nebraska instead of Michigan.

If you would've just admitted being wrong in the first place....things we go a little smoother. Hardass.

Tobias Fünke

dlazz;975034 wrote:Winning records of opponents carry more weight at the end of the season, not in the beginning or middle.

So go ahead and fucking say that in the first place...

sleeper

killer_ewok;975281 wrote:In other words, you were wrong and listed Nebraska instead of Michigan.

If you would've just admitted being wrong in the first place....things we go a little smoother. Hardass.

Sorry you can't comprehend the difference between the two statements I made.

dlazz

Tobias Fünke;975411 wrote:So go ahead and fucking say that in the first place...

I assumed you would be able to realize that on your own, without me having to spell it out for you.

killer_ewok

sleeper;975412 wrote:Sorry you can't comprehend the difference between the two statements I made.

Back to being a stubborn hardass again I see. LOL

Tobias Fünke

dlazz;975437 wrote:I assumed you would be able to realize that on your own, without me having to spell it out for you.

Doubt it. You're just incorrect otherwise you'd have worded that correctly.

athlete37

http://espn.go.com/ncf/recap?gameId=312600087 vs. http://espn.go.com/ncf/recap?gameId=312740194 ; http://espn.go.com/ncf/recap?gameId=312742509 vs. http://espn.go.com/ncf/recap?gameId=313162509 ; now get back in the car and shut up or I'll split your lip!!

dlazz

...what?

athlete37

dlazz;976182 wrote:...what?

What don't you get? The box score comparisons or the National Lampoon's Family Vacation reference?

dlazz

The box score comparisons are meaningless. I didn't say anywhere about OSU being better than ND. You're mistaking me for sleeper.

athlete37

And you're mistaken me for someone who is hesitant to put sleeper in his place... wasn't addressing u

Archive

Does team South Bend ever play anyone with a winning record?