Archive

Does team South Bend ever play anyone with a winning record?

  • sleeper
    I can't even remember the last time. What a joke of a schedule.

    /rant
  • Tobias Fünke
    sleeper;973698 wrote:I'm still an attention whore.
    k gotcha
  • dlazz
    Last time they did play a team with a winning record they got stomped.
  • Con_Alma
    South Bend High School was the 2B State Champions in football in 2010. Certainly they must have played someone with a winning record in the playoffs.

    I don't know how they are doing this year, however.
  • Raw Dawgin' it
    sleeper;973698 wrote:I can't even remember the last time. What a joke of a schedule.

    /rant
    lol coming from a guy who's school lost to purdue...
  • like_that
    These threads are always good for a lol.
  • sleeper
    Con_Alma;973708 wrote:South Bend High School was the 2B State Champions in football in 2010. Certainly they must have played someone with a winning record in the playoffs.

    I don't know how they are doing this year, however.
    /Con_Alma'd
  • Tobias Fünke
    dlazz;973707 wrote:Last time they did play a team with a winning record they got stomped.
    Pretty sure they won actually, 24-17.
  • Tobias Fünke
    Notre Dame played 10 bowl teams last year (not including USC which won eight games), and looks to play 8 this year. I don't think that's too bad.

    I certainly don't think it's that bad when you compare Ohio State's scheduling with 1-9 Akron, 2-9 Colorado, and 1-9 Indiana.
  • Con_Alma
    sleeper;973732 wrote:/Con_Alma'd
    Yet again!
  • dlazz
    Tobias Fünke;973752 wrote:Notre Dame played 10 bowl teams last year
    (implying playing 6-win teams determines "quality" opponents)
    Tobias Fünke;973752 wrote:Pretty sure they won actually, 24-17.
    http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/boxscore?gameId=312950087
  • wildcats20
    ND beat Wake, who was 5-4 at the time of the game.
  • dlazz
    wildcats20;973788 wrote:ND beat Wake, who was 5-4 at the time of the game.
    Irrelevant.
  • sleeper
    dlazz;973790 wrote:Irrelevant.
    Only in South Bend is beating a 5-4 opponent a quality win.
  • killer_ewok
    How about the win over Michigan State? 31-13 if I remember correctly.

    MSU is currently 8-2 and ranked 15th in the country.
  • Tobias Fünke
    dlazz;973707 wrote:Last time they did play a team with a winning record they got stomped.
    dlazz;973790 wrote:Irrelevant.
    How is it irrelevant? You're just fucking wrong with your facts.
    sleeper;973833 wrote:Only in South Bend is beating a 5-4 opponent a quality win.


    Who said it was a quality win?
  • sleeper
    killer_ewok;974064 wrote:How about the win over Michigan State? 31-13 if I remember correctly.

    MSU is currently 8-2 and ranked 15th in the country.
    They got lucky against Nebraska, Wisconsin, and Ohio State. They should be 5-5. Nice try though.
  • dlazz
    Tobias Fünke;974084 wrote:How is it irrelevant? You're just fucking wrong with your facts.
    Their record when they played is irrelevant.
  • sleeper
    Raw Dawgin' it;973712 wrote:lol coming from a guy who's school lost to purdue...
    I'm almost convinced we lost on purpose. If you really want to get into ND vs. OSU I'll gladly start another thread. It won't be pretty for Domers until its moved to the basement by C4F.
  • killer_ewok
    sleeper;974089 wrote:They got lucky against Nebraska, Wisconsin, and Ohio State. They should be 5-5. Nice try though.

    How'd they get lucky against Nebraska? They lost to them 24-3.

    I realize you're not to be taken seriously, but find a way to keep your info accurate.
  • sleeper
    killer_ewok;974112 wrote:How'd they get lucky against Nebraska? They lost to them 24-3.

    I realize you're not to be taken seriously, but find a way to keep your info accurate.
    They should have lost by a lot more, thus they wouldn't be ranked as high as they are. Try to keep up.
  • killer_ewok
    sleeper;974123 wrote:They should have lost by a lot more, thus they wouldn't be ranked as high as they are. Try to keep up.

    You cited those 3 games and then stated they would be 5-5 instead of 8-2. You were talking as if that game was a win that should've been a loss.

    LMAO at you trying to make up some excuse for your inaccurate info. LOL
  • karen lotz
    Time to stop responding to sleeper altogether. Let him start threads and then have he and dlazz reply to each other and have their "fun".
  • vball10set
    not related to football, but it IS Notre Dame related...damn good looking and talented as hell

  • sleeper
    karen lotz;974146 wrote:Time to stop responding to sleeper altogether. Let him start threads and then have he and dlazz reply to each other and have their "fun".
    QQ