KnightRyder, who is your team?

• KnightRyder

  

  sleeper;801522 wrote:No I mean the Nebraska that would win the SEC 9 years out of 10, with the only exception being Flash in the pan U(aka Florida). How does it feel to root for a team that's only relevant one year then disappears? Still dreaming about Tim Tebow, a one man show plowing through the almighty SEC? Tim Tebow would have been broken in half within 2 games in the Big Ten, if he ever got a chance to even get off the bench.

  
  How does it feel to root for a team that's only relevant one year then disappears? ask any buckeye fan
• sleeper

  

  KnightRyder;801713 wrote:How does it feel to root for a team that's only relevant one year then disappears? ask any buckeye fan

  
  You're delusional. OSU has won more in the past 10 years than any other football program in the country. Take into account their history being a top 5 program, and they dwarf whatever shithole you root for.
• KnightRyder

  

  sleeper;801517 wrote:You just described Auburn, a team that is perennially terrible but just beat up on SEC play.

  
  are you talking about the same auburn team led by reggie slack that blasted out ohio state in the hall of fame bowl?
• KnightRyder

  

  sleeper;801715 wrote:You're delusional. OSU has won more in the past 10 years than any other football program in the country. Take into account their history being a top 5 program, and they dwarf whatever ****hole you root for.

  they havent been relevant since the days of maurice clarett
• sleeper

  

  KnightRyder;801719 wrote:they havent been relevant since the days of maurice clarett

  
  LOL, their 5 BCS bowl victories(most all time) say otherwise.
• DeyDurkie5

  

  KnightRyder;801719 wrote:they havent been relevant since the days of maurice clarett

  
  
• enigmaax

  sleeper;801782 wrote:LOL, their 5 BCS bowl victories(most all time) say otherwise.

  
  Soon to be reduced to 3.
• queencitybuckeye

  enigmaax;801836 wrote:Soon to be reduced to 3.

  
  No, still five. Saw each of them. Only sheep will feel required to say/fell otherwise.
• enigmaax

  queencitybuckeye;801927 wrote:No, still five. Saw each of them. Only sheep will feel required to say/fell otherwise.

  
  Baaah...baaah.
• Terry_Tate

  

  sleeper;801782 wrote:LOL, their 5 BCS bowl victories(most all time) say otherwise.

  
  You're underestimating The Ohio State University. They have 6, and will still have at least 4 after this. They do have 5 since Clarett hit campus though.
• KnightRyder

  

  sleeper;801782 wrote:LOL, their 5 BCS bowl victories(most all time) say otherwise.

  
  there is only one BCS bowl game that is relevant. the others are for the also rans
• sleeper

  

  KnightRyder;802032 wrote:there is only one BCS bowl game that is relevant. the others are for the also rans

  
  I'll remember this when Florida fans try to boast about winning the Upstairs Disney's America Bowl brought to you by Sunoco, because that's the only bowl game they are going to win in the next 50 years.
• sleeper

  

  enigmaax;801836 wrote:Soon to be reduced to 3.

  
  Soon to be 50, in the next 50 years.
• KnightRyder

  

  sleeper;802053 wrote:I'll remember this when Florida fans try to boast about winning the Upstairs Disney's America Bowl brought to you by Sunoco, because that's the only bowl game they are going to win in the next 50 years.

  
  thats good. you can tell that to the florida fans , all the while boasting of your near win in the poulan weed eater bowl. which is as relevant as the as your 5 BCS wins
• dwccrew

  

  KnightRyder;801719 wrote:they havent been relevant since the days of maurice clarett

  
  OSU hasn't been relevant since Clarett yet they have played in 2 national title games since Clarett. Even though they lost those games, they still were in them and playing for a national title. That is the epitomy of being relevant.
• Writerbuckeye

  

  Let's see: playing in six BCS games (two of them title games) is irrelevant?
  
  I guess that's true if being one of the best 10 teams in the country year after year is irrelevant -- which, of course, is not the case.
  
  When all is said and done with the NCAA investigation, the loss of Tressel will turn out to be -- by far -- the worst punishment for OSU. You simply can't replace a coach who has AVERAGED about one conference loss per year during his career, and won the most BCS games of any coach in history at the time he left coaching.
  
  History shows that whoever replaces coaches this successful almost always are not as good, and the cycle takes a turn down.
• vball10set

  btw, has KnightRyder manned up yet?
• sleeper

  

  KnightRyder;802084 wrote:thats good. you can tell that to the florida fans , all the while boasting of your near win in the poulan weed eater bowl. which is as relevant as the as your 5 BCS wins

  
  Well, you're right. We can always look at OSU's 7 relevant National Championships to Florida's 3 Championships. Must suck to not even be half as good as OSU. LOL
• enigmaax

  sleeper;803280 wrote:Well, you're right. We can always look at OSU's 7 relevant National Championships to Florida's 3 Championships. Must suck to not even be half as good as OSU. LOL

  
  Good point. Hey, where did you party after all those championships? And, did you celebrate differently when they won the FWAA or the NFF only, since you know, they didn't really win one of the most recognized titles in those two years? I'm interested in the perspective from someone who was there for those.
• KnightRyder

  

  dwccrew;802943 wrote:OSU hasn't been relevant since Clarett yet they have played in 2 national title games since Clarett. Even though they lost those games, they still were in them and playing for a national title. That is the epitomy of being relevant.

  
  yea they were playing in those games, but they werent in actually in those games . those games for the most part were over early. no that the fact they lost. but nature in which they were blasted out of them, shows they werent really relevant.
• KnightRyder

  

  sleeper;803280 wrote:Well, you're right. We can always look at OSU's 7 relevant National Championships to Florida's 3 Championships. Must suck to not even be half as good as OSU. LOL

  
  by those standards notre dames with their 13 national title would be relevant, and almost twice as good as OSU
• sleeper

  

  enigmaax;803381 wrote:Good point. Hey, where did you party after all those championships? And, did you celebrate differently when they won the FWAA or the NFF only, since you know, they didn't really win one of the most recognized titles in those two years? I'm interested in the perspective from someone who was there for those.

  
  OSU only claims 7 NC's, and yes, I celebrated all of them.
  
  It sucks being a Florida fan, only good with Tim Tebow(an overrated player), and the mediocrity the rest of the years. I understand you wanting the perspective from a fan of a consistent top tier program, instead of a program that isn't even the best in its own state. LOL
• sleeper

  

  KnightRyder;803406 wrote:by those standards notre dames with their 13 national title then relevant, and also twice as good as OSU

  
  I've said multiple time that ND's championships are irrelevant because they have never won it on the field. It's been proven that any time ND plays a good team, they lose, so the past championships are illegitimate.
  
  Plus come on, it's ND, they are garbage.
• KnightRyder

  

  Writerbuckeye;803268 wrote:Let's see: playing in six BCS games (two of them title games) is irrelevant?
  
  I guess that's true if being one of the best 10 teams in the country year after year is irrelevant -- which, of course, is not the case.
  
  When all is said and done with the NCAA investigation, the loss of Tressel will turn out to be -- by far -- the worst punishment for OSU. You simply can't replace a coach who has AVERAGED about one conference loss per year during his career, and won the most BCS games of any coach in history at the time he left coaching.
  
  History shows that whoever replaces coaches this successful almost always are not as good, and the cycle takes a turn down.

  
  no fan base is as infatuated with the BCS like buckeye fans. you take back to back beat downs in title games. and just boast about playing in some consolitation game. only one BCS games any thing, everyone outside of buckeye nation knows that. i can see where playing in a non title BCS game is such a sign of greatness. didnt a 8 win uconn team get a BCS bowl? now that is greatness. i'm sure that game was relevant also.
• KnightRyder

  

  sleeper;803410 wrote:I've said multiple time that ND's championships are irrelevant because they have never won it on the field. It's been proven that any time ND plays a good team, they lose, so the past championships are illegitimate.
  
  Plus come on, it's ND, they are garbage.

  
  a title is a title , and they have 13. it isnt like the rules didnt apply to all college teams . and as you stated any time ND a good team they lose, well lately the same could be said for OSU. and if past championships are illegitimate (your words not mine). well your seven are all in the past , that makes them illegitimate.