Notre Dame "unlikely" to accept bowl invitation
-
Fly4Fun
Yes, I do know what a football looks like, but I didn't play. My talents were better utilized in other sports. What does that have to do anything?crusader1980 wrote:
Do you even know what a football looks like? Buy a clue.Fly4Fun wrote: Haha... claiming this is about money is a big joke. Seriously... when they keep firing coaches before their massive contracts are up you know money isn't really an issue. All we always here is how much money ND has and it is never an issue.
Sad move on ND's part. Arrogance and cowardice are the motives that seem the most likely. Arrogance that they think they are above it; cowardice that they are affraid of what might happen if they lose.
Read again. THE PLAYERS voted not to go. How is that being a coward?
Walk up to Te'o, and call him a coward to his face.
I thought so...
SO what if the players voted not to go? My point still stands... arrogance and cowardice are the emotions/feelings behind this decision. Just because you don't like my reasoning you have to start calling me names and making no actual argument to the contrary?
If I see an athlete decide not to compete then I see someone who is a coward... unless it's for medical reasons or a better competition more practical path somewhere else. Athletes LOVE to compete... unless they are afraid of what might happen if they lose. That's what happened here... cowardice.
They think they are too good for a bowl that would want a 6-6 team and are afraid of the ramifications of losing. -
newarkcatholicfan
With the players voting no, I have to wonder what the incoming coach will think about the players he will be coaching? -
ts1227
Anyone who was calling them arrogant for accepting the bowl last year is just foolish, and were looking for a way just to bash ND.rocket31 wrote: ~last year when notre dame was 6-6 they accepted a bowl bid and was consequently labeled arrogant, elitist, and told that some other team deserved it over them.
This year they deserve to be bashed, though. -
newarkcatholicfan
I would applaud any team that said look we are 6-6 and do not deserve a bowl game but to turn it down and not say why (money is not an issue so that I do not believe) is a reason to for lack of better words look down on them then add to the fact they traveled a long way last season and had the same record going in makes it hard for the common fan to respect their decision at all.
-
killer_ewok
After they announced that Earle Bruce would be fired at the conclusion of the 1987 season (a season which saw Ohio State finish 6-4-1)....OSU's AD at the time, Rick Bay, made a statement......Mulva wrote: Notre Dame players choosing to take their ball and go home.
Completely arrogant and ridiculous, no matter how ND fans try to spin it. If OSU ever did this I would be appalled.
http://www.nytimes.com/1987/11/17/sports/bruce-let-go-by-ohio-state.htmlBay added that Ohio State would not accept a bowl invitation this year even if one were offered. -
killer_ewok
And to those saying that "Notre Dame isn't going to a bowl because of this or that" like it's a fact.....you have NO way of knowing for sure what their exact reason was. If you know for sure.....feel free to post how you know this or what evidence you have.
-
newarkcatholicfan
Was one offered?killer_ewok wrote:
After they announced that Earle Bruce would be fired at the conclusion of the 1987 season (a season which saw Ohio State finish 6-4-1)....OSU's AD at the time, Rick Bay, made a statement......Mulva wrote: Notre Dame players choosing to take their ball and go home.
Completely arrogant and ridiculous, no matter how ND fans try to spin it. If OSU ever did this I would be appalled.
http://www.nytimes.com/1987/11/17/sports/bruce-let-go-by-ohio-state.htmlBay added that Ohio State would not accept a bowl invitation this year even if one were offered.
6-4-1 is still better that being .500. -
killer_ewok
If ND thought they were too good to go to a lower tier Bowl and if they were afraid of losing a lower tier Bowl and consequently falling below .500........why did they accept the invite to play Hawaii in the Hawaii Bowl last year? It's pretty much the same situation as last season except ND doesn't have a Head Coach this time around. Yeah, but I guess that couldn't possibly be the reason for declining a Bowl invite this year......
-
killer_ewok
newarkcatholicfan wrote:
Was one offered?killer_ewok wrote:
After they announced that Earle Bruce would be fired at the conclusion of the 1987 season (a season which saw Ohio State finish 6-4-1)....OSU's AD at the time, Rick Bay, made a statement......Mulva wrote: Notre Dame players choosing to take their ball and go home.
Completely arrogant and ridiculous, no matter how ND fans try to spin it. If OSU ever did this I would be appalled.
http://www.nytimes.com/1987/11/17/sports/bruce-let-go-by-ohio-state.htmlBay added that Ohio State would not accept a bowl invitation this year even if one were offered.
6-4-1 is still better that being .500.
Not to my knowledge but it doesn't matter. They stated their intent to decline a Bowl invite if one was extended to them. And me mentioning 6-4-1 wasn't too make OSU's season look bad......it was to actually show that they had a better season than ND did this year and still had no intention of accepting a Bowl invite AFTER BRUCE WAS FIRED. Was the intent to decline the Bowl bid because of arrogance? Being afraid? Or....maybe it had to do with not having a Head Coach.
So you stating that 6-4-1 is better than .500 was pointless. I know this and wasn't attempting to say otherwise. -
ts1227
There was motivation last year to break their bowl losing streak, and it was a vacation in Hawaii (as opposed to Michigan or Alabama this year)
-
killer_ewok
Possibly. Just as the motivation not to accept one this year could possibly be because they don't have a Head Coach.ts1227 wrote: There was motivation last year to break their bowl losing streak, and it was a vacation in Hawaii (as opposed to Michigan or Alabama this year) -
2kool4skool
Like I said, I don't care if the admin feels like they shouldn't play in a bowl. But the players voting no is really troubling. I just can't picture any competitive athlete ever making a decision like that. Really, really strange and should be a huge red flag for whoever the new coach is. -
Mr Pat
LOL, English.ccrunner609 wrote: Probably just someone like CLausen and Tate telling everyone to say no because they dotn want to lose again and lost draft stock.