Blind Resumes
-
SportsAndLadydtdtim;695529 wrote:??? I don't see the cleverness in this as both my addition and my use of the word 'assume' are both completely correct.
Since the overall record isn't specifically stated in the blind resume, any information about a team's overall record has to be an assumption. Pick up a dictionary. This type of logical action is called a supposition or correct assumption. I wasn't trying to teach you anything, I was trying to save others from making his or herself look like a fool that can't decipher simple information.
Good attempt at a burn, though.
The cleverness you failed to see, was that you said you assume that 3+16=19 and that 5+4=9.
Those are very amazing assumptions you just made. -
dtdtimSportsAndLady;695531 wrote:The cleverness you failed to see, was that you said you assume that 3+16=19 and that 5+4=9.
Those are very amazing assumptions you just made.
What you're failing to see is that I have agreed from the very beginning that it is not that hard to assume these things and figure out the overall record while you were pissing and moaning like a little girl because the record wasn't listed straightforward in-and-of itself.
Were you bitching about it just to bitch or what? The more we talk about it, the more it seems that that is the case. I don't doubt that you knew how to do it, so why bitch about it? Is it possible for you to have input in any thread that doesn't become a big argument over who can cleverly out-douche the other? -
SportsAndLadydtdtim;695536 wrote:Is it possible for you to have input in any thread that doesn't become a big argument over who can cleverly out-douche the other?
Yeah plenty. Just because you pick out one or two threads where I try and out-douche the other douche doesn't mean that's all I do. Durrr -
dtdtim
Really?SportsAndLady;695537 wrote:Yeah plenty. Just because you pick out one or two threads where I try and out-douche the other douche doesn't mean that's all I do. Durrr
I'll take that answer as an inadvertent 'no'. -
SportsAndLadydtdtim;695540 wrote:Really?
I'll take that answer as an inadvertent 'no'.
I was kidding dude..relax