Blind Resumes

• Cleveland Buck

  

  Use some of the things the committee is supposed to look at to compare these teams. Rank them in order of most deserving of an NCAA bid. SOS numbers are from Pomeroy's website.
  
  
  Team A:
  Overall SOS: 131
  Nonconference SOS: 284
  Record vs. RPI Top 50: 2-2
  Record vs. RPI Top 100: 3-5
  Record. vs. Bad Teams: 16-4
  Road Record vs. RPI Top 100: 1-4
  
  Team B:
  Overall SOS: 9
  Nonconference SOS: 189
  Record vs. RPI Top 50: 2-8
  Record vs. RPI Top 100: 9-11
  Record vs. Bad Teams: 9-1
  Road Record vs. RPI Top 100: 4-4
  
  Team C:
  Overall SOS: 86
  Nonconference SOS: 332
  Record vs. RPI Top 50: 2-5
  Record vs. RPI Top 100: 5-7
  Record vs. Bad Teams: 13-3
  Road Record vs. RPI Top 100: 1-3
  
  Team D:
  Overall SOS: 199
  Nonconference SOS: 293
  Record vs. RPI Top 50: 0-4
  Record vs. RPI Top 100: 1-5
  Record vs. Bad Teams: 22-2
  Road Record vs. RPI Top 100: 0-2
  
  Team E:
  Overall SOS: 8
  Nonconference SOS: 161
  Record vs. RPI Top 50: 3-7
  Record vs. RPI Top 100: 5-9
  Record vs. Bad Teams: 12-2
  Road Record vs. RPI Top 100: 1-5
  
  Team F:
  Overall SOS: 46
  Nonconference SOS: 178
  Record vs. RPI Top 50: 3-9
  Record vs. RPI Top 100: 5-9
  Record vs. Bad Teams: 14-0
  Road Record vs. RPI Top 100: 2-3
  
  Team G:
  Overall SOS: 94
  Nonconference SOS: 341
  Record vs. RPI Top 50: 2-6
  Record vs. RPI Top 100: 6-7
  Record vs. Bad Teams: 12-3
  Road Record vs. RPI Top 100: 0-4
  
  Team H:
  Overall SOS: 128
  Nonconference SOS: 107
  Record vs. RPI Top 50: 1-4
  Record vs. RPI Top 100: 4-6
  Record vs. Bad Teams: 19-1
  Road Record vs. RPI Top 100: 1-3
  
  Team I:
  Overall SOS: 86
  Nonconference SOS: 98
  Record vs. RPI Top 50: 1-6
  Record vs. RPI Top 100: 6-10
  Record vs. Bad Teams: 11-1
  Road Record vs. RPI Top 100: 1-6
• SportsAndLady

  

  You're not gonna give us overall records?
• karen lotz

  

  I prefer cc to make this kind of blind comparisons. He usually includes only half of the stats so it really makes you think.
• Cleveland Buck

  

  SportsAndLady;693607 wrote:You're not gonna give us overall records?

  
  Those numbers show all of their losses, and I don't care how many wins they have over the +100 RPI teams, so overall records are unnecessary.
• SportsAndLady

  

  Overall records are unnecessary...gotcha
  
  lmao
• Tiger2003

  

  SportsAndLady;693636 wrote:Overall records are unnecessary...gotcha
  
  lmao

  +1
• Cleveland Buck

  

  There you go. Overall records are included for those who value that kind of thing.
• karen lotz

  

  You honestly think overall record isn't valued? Do you think the selection committee disregards it?
• Cleveland Buck

  

  karen lotz;693685 wrote:You honestly think overall record isn't valued? Do you think the selection committee disregards it?

  
  I'm sure some people value it. It doesn't tell me anything except that Team B who is 9-1 against bad teams would probably be 22-2 against them if they played Team D's schedule.
• SportsAndLady

  

  I'm not seeing the overall records still lol
• Cleveland Buck

  

  SportsAndLady;693691 wrote:I'm not seeing the overall records still lol

  
  Add the record vs. the top 100 to the record vs. bad teams. That is their total record.
• dtdtim

  SportsAndLady;693691 wrote:I'm not seeing the overall records still lol

  Cleveland Buck;693597 wrote: Team A:
  Overall SOS: 131
  Nonconference SOS: 284
  Record vs. RPI Top 50: 2-2
  Record vs. RPI Top 100: 3-5
  Record. vs. Bad Teams: 16-4
  Road Record vs. RPI Top 100: 1-4

  
  Addition? I would assume this team is 19-9.
• SportsAndLady

  

  WTF just put their fucking overall records on there, it's not that hard and its what every blind resume' has included
• Cleveland Buck

  

  dtdtim;693706 wrote:Addition? I would assume this team is 19-9.

  
  Now just show S&L how simple that was.
• SportsAndLady

  

  Yeah the guy who ASSUMES 3-5 and 16-4 together is 19-9 needs to teach me addition...right
• karen lotz

  

  I wonder if CB happened to see that Gene Smith interview...
• Cleveland Buck

  

  karen lotz;693799 wrote:I wonder if CB happened to see that Gene Smith interview...

  
  I didn't, why?
• devil1197

  Overall wins not important???
  
  Just as Gene Smith, a major player in the selection committee this year, says he looks at overall win totals first.
  
  SMH
• karen lotz

  

  He was asked what was his main criteria on teams getting in the tournament. His reply was overall wins. Just thought that was odd that the Committee Chair uses that as his biggest criteria.
• Cleveland Buck

  

  I didn't see his comments, but that sounds pretty stupid. Why play anyone then? I read a couple of articles by guys who participated in that mock selection they did and they talked about how important SOS, especially non conference SOS, road/neutral performance, and the RPI rating of your wins are to the selection committee.
• Mulva

  

  Those teams all suck. I vote that none of them get in.
  
  But team F would be my first choice.
• cat_lover

  1.F
  2.B
  3.E
  4.C
  5.H
  6.I
  7.A
  8.D
  9.G
• bucks36

  

  Cleveland Buck;693918 wrote:I didn't see his comments, but that sounds pretty stupid. Why play anyone then? I read a couple of articles by guys who participated in that mock selection they did and they talked about how important SOS, especially non conference SOS, road/neutral performance, and the RPI rating of your wins are to the selection committee.

  
  He said everyone on the committee has their own starting point and his is overall wins. He then looks at SOS, RPI etc. to further his evaluation.
• CinciX12

  

  In the future, no one wants to look at that many teams at 1 time. I attempted and got bored and started to stare at the wall. 3 teams is about what you should compare at the most.
• dtdtim

  SportsAndLady;693761 wrote:Yeah the guy who ASSUMES 3-5 and 16-4 together is 19-9 needs to teach me addition...right

  ??? I don't see the cleverness in this as both my addition and my use of the word 'assume' are both completely correct.
  
  Since the overall record isn't specifically stated in the blind resume, any information about a team's overall record has to be an assumption. Pick up a dictionary. This type of logical action is called a supposition or correct assumption.
  
  Is it possible for you to post on any thread without the end result of you coming off looking like a douche? I wasn't attacking you or mocking you in my post and, you have to admit, it seemed like you honestly didn't know the overall records.