Cavs or Ohio State

• UA5straightin2008

  

  Was asked who would win in a game between the Cavs and OSU yesterday, and just saw the question posed on PTI?
  
  Whatd you think?
• yobro08

  cavs by alot
• wes_mantooth

  

  cavs by a lot.
  
  They are god awful, but the are kind of a pro team
• SQ_Crazies

  

  Cavs by 20+. Stupid question.
• vball10set

  SQ_Crazies;670581 wrote:Cavs by 20+. Stupid question.

  
  this, +1000
• september63

  

  Cavs by as many as everyone else suggested. Ill even 2nd the stupid question comment!!
• dave

  If the Cavs tried it would be at least a 40 point game, probably much more.
• burt07

  Always the dumbest debate, no matter what the sport.
• Y-Town Steelhound

  

  Cavs by at least 20
• jordo212000

  

  Is there an SQ Crazies sighting?
  
  As for the matchup, I have got to say the Cavs win, but I would like to see the game. I think Ohio State could keep it close for a while
• SportsAndLady

  

  jordo212000;670623 wrote: I think Ohio State could keep it close for a while

  
  Why am I not surprised that you are the only one on this thread who thinks this?
• Tiger2003

  

  jordo212000;670623 wrote: I think Ohio State could keep it close for a while

  
  The only time it would be close is the first 5 minutes.
• jordo212000

  

  I think Ohio State could keep it close for a while

  
  The only time it would be close is the first 5 minutes.

  You might be right, but if the time comes where Sullinger gets drafted by the Cavs, he automatically becomes their best player. If he was still playing for the Buckeyes, they'd have the best player on the court. That alone makes me think they could be competitive. IF the other guys on the team play their best I see no reason why they couldn't keep up.
  
  Let's remember Manny Harris is one of their better players. Ohio States 2s and 3s can handle him. They have in the past
• KR1245

  

  Cavs by 30......at least
  
  Manny Harris isnt one of the Cavs better players
• SportsAndLady

  

  jordo212000;670726 wrote:You might be right, but if the time comes where Sullinger gets drafted by the Cavs, he automatically becomes their best player. If he was still playing for the Buckeyes, they'd have the best player on the court. That alone makes me think they could be competitive. IF the other guys on the team play their best I see no reason why they couldn't keep up.
  
  Let's remember Manny Harris is one of their better players. Ohio States 2s and 3s can handle him. They have in the past

  
  You seriously are retarded.
  
  1) Sullinger does not become Cleveland's best player if he were drafted by the Cavs and their roster is the same as it is right now.
  
  2) Even if Sullinger is the best player, that doesn't mean OSU would be competitive. Just because you have the best player does not mean you can be competitive.
  
  3) Manny Harris is not one of the Cavs best players, he's not even top 5. He's averaging 7 points a game for christ sake.
  
  4) Ohio State's 2s and 3s might have handled Manny before, does not mean that they could do it again; he's had a year of training in the damn NBA, I think he's probably improved by the time he was at Michigan.
• GOONx19

  

  Just stop now, Jordo.
• mallymal614

  Are we talking NBA (48 minutes) or college (40 minutes) time?
• mallymal614

  SQ_Crazies;670581 wrote:Cavs by 20+. Stupid question.

  
  Well look who's back!
• wildcats20

  

  mallymal614;670782 wrote:Are we talking NBA (48 minutes) or college (40 minutes) time?

  
  The only difference would be the final score for each team.
  
  
  A college team would NEVER beat an NBA team. I don't care what rules you play, who refs the game, where the game is played. It would never happen.
  
  The BEST college teams usually have 2-3 pros on the team. The WORST pro team has 12 pros on their roster.
• jordo212000

  

  Am I missing something? Where did I say Ohio State would beat Cleveland. I am just saying that I think Ohio State could keep it fairly competitive for a while.
  
  I don't care what any of you say, Sullinger would instantly be the best player on that team. Who is better than him? Sure you need more than one good player, but just look at the Cavs. "One" player made a big difference on how many wins they are going to finish with this year. With Lebron they at least finish in the top 3 in the East. Without him they are a lottery team. Not saying Sullinger = Lebron, just saying that one guy can dramatically improve a team and make up for lesser parts surrounding him.
• jordo212000

  

  wildcats20;670789 wrote:The WORST pro team has 12 pros on their roster.

  
  That's debatable
• SQ_Crazies

  

  jordo212000;670847 wrote:That's debatable

  
  LMFAO
• ytownfootball

  

  Jesus H...SMH
• jordo212000

  

  Who is better than Sullinger right now on the Cavs roster. Seriously?
• Crimson streak

  

  Hickson, Jameson, Gibson. Andy , sessions, mo, do I need to continue?