Archive

Week 12: (6) Wisconsin def. Michigan, 48-28

  • Hb31187
    Why? Defense isnt stopping ANYONE, gotta try to get it within 1 score

    damn near worked, 1 badger in the middle of like 8 wolverines got that kick
  • Hb31187
    See lol, 3rd and long and they convert a stretch play? kinda comical/pathetic
  • LJ
    This is why the 3-3-5 will never work in the B10
  • WebFire
    Hb31187;567105 wrote:Why? Defense isnt stopping ANYONE, gotta try to get it within 1 score

    damn near worked, 1 badger in the middle of like 8 wolverines got that kick

    Because, they are only down 10, not 40, in the 3rd quarter. IF they get a stop, why not have a chance at good field position? If were weren't coming back from 24-0 no one would have been calling for the onside with that point spread and that point in the game.
  • WebFire
    LJ;567107 wrote:This is why the 3-3-5 will never work in the B10

    You mean it won't work period? Why do people act like the Big 10 teams run some special offenses that no one else in the country run?
  • Ty Webb
    I went to McDonalds this morning and got their football magizine and they predicted the same score for this game that I did

    Just kinda funny
  • LJ
    WebFire;567111 wrote:You mean it won't work period? Why do people act like the Big 10 teams run some special offenses that no one else in the country run?

    3-3-5 will work against exactly what Rich Rod runs. It puts speed on the field. It won't work against power offenses. The 3-3-5 actually worked quite well RR's last 2 years in the BE, but they were playing mainly spread offense type teams.
  • WebFire
    Wow.
  • LJ
    that JJ Watt is the real deal
  • WebFire
    LJ;567118 wrote:3-3-5 will work against exactly what Rich Rod runs. It puts speed on the field. It won't work against power offenses. The 3-3-5 actually worked quite well RR's last 2 years in the BE, but they were playing mainly spread offense type teams.

    But when they run something different they still suck. And the 3-3-5 can stop the run if it is run properly and has good players.
  • LJ
    WebFire;567127 wrote:But when they run something different they still suck.
    That is true
    And the 3-3-5 can stop the run if it is run properly and has good players.
    Not really, his teams have always sucked against power running teams
  • ts1227
    Hb31187;567078 wrote:Chris Speilman spews out some of the dumbest shit lol
    What's even scarier is he sounds like a genius on TV compared to his radio show.
  • LJ
    and Chris Spielman agrees with me
  • LJ
    ts1227;567130 wrote:What's even scarier is he sounds like a genius on TV compared to his radio show.

    When he's on, he's really on. When he is off... he is WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY off.
  • ts1227
    LJ;567133 wrote:When he's on, he's really on. When he is off... he is WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY off.

    True. Main difference between him on TV and radio is he actually thinks before talking on TV. He generally is pretty decent during games.
  • LJ
    ts1227;567137 wrote:True. Main difference between him on TV and radio is he actually thinks before talking on TV. He generally is pretty good during games.

    I think the biggest problem on the radio is he gets really preachy and interjects his own morals into discussions about teams and players WAY too much,
  • WebFire
    LJ;567129 wrote:That is true Not really, his teams have always sucked against power running teams

    Exactly, HIS teams have sucked running it. I'm not disagreeing that they should run something different, but I think too much emphasis is put into what base defense they run. That is just a small part of the problem.
  • darbypitcher22
    wow... Michigan's defense is turrrrible across the board
  • Ty Webb
    When Wisconsin puts this drive into the endzone,they will have punched their ticket to Pasadena
  • LJ
    WebFire;567141 wrote:Exactly, HIS teams have sucked running it. I'm not disagreeing that they should run something different, but I think too much emphasis is put into what base defense they run. That is just a small part of the problem.

    You have no idea what you are talking about. The 3-3-5 is specifically built to counter spread offenses. Read up on it a bit.
  • WebFire
    LJ;567146 wrote:You have no idea what you are talking about. The 3-3-5 is specifically built to counter spread offenses. Read up on it a bit.

    Eat shit. I know what the 3-3-5 is. My point being THE BASE DEFENSE IS A SMALL PART OF THE PROBLEM. WHEN THEY RUN SOMETHING ELSE THEY STILL SUCK.

    Get it yet?
  • Hb31187
    Denard is a hell of a dual threat QB. Too bad this defense is middle school level
  • Trueblue23
    So many missed chances in this game.

    The onside kicks, the overthrown WR on the 1st possession..

    We're getting waxed but I'm proud Michigan not giving up.
  • LJ
    WebFire;567164 wrote:Eat shit. I know what the 3-3-5 is. My point being THE BASE DEFENSE IS A SMALL PART OF THE PROBLEM. WHEN THEY RUN SOMETHING ELSE THEY STILL SUCK.

    Get it yet?

    So you are telling me that a team that is short on DB's that is running a defense that is dependent on on having exceptional DB's wouldn't be any better running some type of traditional defense? riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.
  • WebFire
    Hb31187;567165 wrote:Denard is a hell of a dual threat QB. Too bad this defense is middle school level

    Don't worry, we'll switch to the 4-3 and beat OSU next week. Right LJ?