Archive

Notre Dame releases 2011 and 2012 schedules

  • cats gone wild
    vball10set;526173 wrote:lotz has a little more tact than that, and don't think the word "cupcakes" is only directed towards OSU--
    karen lotz;526176 wrote:I agree. They should play more MAC/I-AA/teams full of cripples and then get exposed by the first team with a pulse they play.
    Spoke too early vball, or let me guess.......this wasnt a shot either?

    Or this
    http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/threads/18071-Missing-posters
  • -Society-
    cats gone wild;526184 wrote:Hey, society is back. Never posting anything valuable as always. Why dont you go start another topic like LSU vs. McNeese. That worked well for ya.

    Hey, LSU looked real good against that 1aa school. Don't worry, I have some more topics waiting for you. Go Jesus!
  • karen lotz
    cats gone wild;526178 wrote:I did that, because its a certain that UF will probably be ranked next year like they usually are, while USC we dont know about after all the NCAA sanctions. USC isnt ranked now with Carroll's recruits, and now after all the problems I dont know how long it will be until they are dominant again. Do you think Kiffen will bring them back next year to be a PAC 10 contender?


    I think Lane Kiffin will have them closer to being a PAC 10 contender next year than Derek Dooley will have Tennessee and Houston Nutt will have Ole Miss in relation to SEC contention.


    Mississippi State will keep improving but do you see them contending in the SEC next year? What about Arkansas?
  • cats gone wild
    -Society-;526195 wrote:Hey, LSU looked real good against that 1aa school. Don't worry, I have some more topics waiting for you. Go Jesus!

    Sweet! When you know a single percentage as much as I do in college football you should post on here. Until then, leave. You are invaluable on this site.
  • rock_knutne
    cats gone wild;526154 wrote:To add in the argument, LSU's schedule for next year has currently ranked teams

    1. Oregon
    5. Auburn
    7. Bama
    20. WVU
    21. Arkansas
    24. Miss. St
    That's without Florida who currently isnt ranked.

    ND has

    8. Mich st
    12. Stanford


    NOT EVEN CLOSE!!

    He's talking about ND's 2012 schedule, geesh! Oh and I agree, ND's 2011 schedule is not very tough.
  • cats gone wild
    karen lotz;526198 wrote:I think Lane Kiffin will have them closer to being a PAC 10 contender next year than Derek Dooley will have Tennessee and Houston Nutt will have Ole Miss in relation to SEC contention.

    Maybe will see. I dont know what people see in Dooley myself. Tenn wont be back for awhile IMO. They made a mistake a couple years ago.
  • karen lotz
    cats gone wild;526190 wrote:Spoke too early vball, or let me guess.......this wasnt a shot either?

    Or this
    http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/threads/18071-Missing-posters


    you need to calm down a little bit. What does that other thread have to do with you or LSU's 2011 schedule or ND's 2011 and 2012 schedules? All that does is remind me that devil still hasn't been back.
  • -Society-
    cats gone wild;526199 wrote:Sweet! When you know a single percentage as much as I do in college football you should post on here. Until then, leave. You are invaluable on this site.

    Haha...you don't know shit other than sucking on the balls of Sec teams. I'm surprised you haven't choked to death swallowing that much. You must be Catholic.
  • cats gone wild
    Keep showing your class society. Instead of posting your atheist comments, post something factual towards college football. Do you even watch football?
  • -Society-
    cats gone wild;526214 wrote:Keep showing your class society. Instead of posting your atheist comments, post something factual towards college football. Do you even watch football?

    I don't. I just know that Catholics, like yourself, like to suck little boys balls.
  • lhslep134
    cats gone wild;526145 wrote:Arkansas, WVU and Miss St are mediocre?
    As I said compare the teams and schedule for 2011. Ill wait patiently.

    You have USC (who might fall off the radar), Stanford, MSU, and maybe Mich (a huge maybe)........the rest is mediocre.
    ND's schedule is pretty freaking tough in 2012, but not so much in 2011.

    CATS STOP! THE SEC is ALL mediocre after the top 1 or 2.

    Proof? USCe losing to KENTUCKY after beating ALABAMA. None of those 3 teams (UK, USCe, Ala) are elite, just pretty good at best (Alabama).

    Hmmmmmm.

    The SEC just isn't as tough as you think it is Cats.



    Stop sucking on the SEC dick.
  • cats gone wild
    lhslep still must be upset after suffering 4 losses this year and one to LSU. You have lost your argument ^^ time and time again, and Im not going to get back into your little cry baby argument. Maybe next year OSU or UF will get you back in the title hunt.
  • vball10set
    cats gone wild;526190 wrote:Spoke too early vball, or let me guess.......this wasnt a shot either?

    Or this
    http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/threads/18071-Missing-posters
    fwiw, cats, lotz and I don't need you to instigate consternation--we do that okay on our own, thank you :D

    btw, lotz, what is your college alma mater? mine is the University of Toledo, but I've been a lifelong OSU fan. While we're at it, how 'bout you, cats??
  • lhslep134
    cats gone wild;526255 wrote:lhslep still must be upset after suffering 4 losses this year and one to LSU. You have lost your argument ^^ time and time again, and Im not going to get back into your little cry baby argument. Maybe next year OSU or UF will get you back in the title hunt.

    So wait, the SEC is elite because USCe beat Alabama but lost to Kentucky?

    Please cats, show me the logic in that argument!

    Notice how I didn't bring up LSU, OSU, or UF once, yet you did. Doesn't that make you a troll?

    Now please, STFU.
  • cats gone wild
    No, your post be4 your last one shows who the troll is. I wasnt talking to you in this topic and you came aboard with your garbage that never has had any factual evidence. And also, your post had nothing to do with the ND schedule. You just jumped on here to troll and to be a cry-baby. But, keep being a troll. Im glad you came out of hiding a week and a half after LSU smacked you around..
    You wont see me responding to your posts anymore so please dont waste your time.
  • karen lotz
    vball10set;526257 wrote:fwiw, cats, lotz and I don't need you to instigate consternation--we do that okay on our own, thank you :D

    btw, lotz, what is your college alma mater? mine is the University of Toledo, but I've been a lifelong OSU fan. While we're at it, how 'bout you, cats??

    Not sure what it has to do with anything. I went to Ohio State.
  • cats gone wild
    karen lotz;526358 wrote:Not sure what it has to do with anything.
    I agree.
  • lhslep134
    cats gone wild;526349 wrote:No, your post be4 your last one shows who the troll is. I wasnt talking to you in this topic and you came aboard with your garbage that never has had any factual evidence. And also, your post had nothing to do with the ND schedule. You just jumped on here to troll and to be a cry-baby. But, keep being a troll. Im glad you came out of hiding a week and a half after LSU smacked you around..
    You wont see me responding to your posts anymore so please dont waste your time.

    And who's won a national championship more recently?

    I'm certainly not crying over UF's loss. In fact, what is this 1.5 week hiatus you mention? Didn't I come out on the LSU/UF thread and say ballsy win by LSU?

    But don't let facts get in the way of clouding your little fantasy world. Sorry, next time I won't use facts.

    In FACT, I'm still waiting for your response as to how USCe beating Alabama and losing to Kentucky makes the SEC elite, because I'm pretty sure it just proves mediocrity.
  • sleeper
    That 2012 schedule is pretty tough, I will admit. But given ND's mediocrity over the past 20+ years, are they stupid? 6-6 bowl loss is really the best they can hope for, and that could be considered a successful season.
  • sleeper
    And let's be honest here, the SEC is composed of 3 elite teams(LSU, Bama, Florida) and the rest are just average(and we're still not sure about Florida until they learn how to snap the ball). Saying any school outside of that is tough, is like saying Michigan State is tough(they are having a great season, it does not make them elite).

    Book it.
  • vball10set
    karen lotz;526358 wrote:Not sure what it has to do with anything. I went to Ohio State.
    it doesn't, but I have my reason for asking, and you answered it--thanks
  • vball10set
    vball10set;526257 wrote: btw, lotz, what is your college alma mater? mine is the University of Toledo, but I've been a lifelong OSU fan. While we're at it, how 'bout you, cats??
    karen lotz;526358 wrote:Not sure what it has to do with anything. I went to Ohio State.
    cats gone wild;526362 wrote:I agree.
    of course you do--it would've surprised the crap out of me if you would've answered...because you CAN'T :rolleyes:
  • Footwedge
    2011 schedule is pretty easy. 2012 is legit.
  • Crimson streak
    I think notre dame will be a top 10 team next year with that schedule and the offense should be more consistent to sustain drives unlike this year
  • grodt
    If they get their playmakers (Floyd, Rudolph) to come back. 2011 should be a lot easier then 2012, but still not a cakewalk.