Archive

Terrelle Pryor

  • Automatik
    Ty Webb;489533 wrote:He has looked ok this year....nothing special

    His future in the NFL is as a WR/Wildcat QB
    Although it is only week 3, he is being mentioned in the Heisman race on a weekly basis. I would say that is a little better than "nothing special." But that type of comment is expected from you.

    I'm happy with his improvement....but I'm still unsure where he will end up in the next level. Like already said....he has a lot of time to get better.
  • cats gone wild
    Hey guys, its only 3 weeks and only playing cupcakes. Its "too early" to start a thread like this..........

    And on a serious note, I know OSU fans are biased for Pryor to win Heisman, but he is not in the top 2 so far. Just sayin......

    I will be bias and say that P. Peterson from LSU should win Heisman and has improved a bunch.........:)
  • Automatik
    cats gone wild;489597 wrote:Hey guys, its only 3 weeks and only playing cupcakes. Its "too early" to start a thread like this..........

    And on a serious note, I know OSU fans are biased for Pryor to win Heisman, but he is not in the top 2 so far. Just sayin......

    I will be bias and say that P. Peterson from LSU should win Heisman and has improved a bunch.........:)

    Biased to win it? Umm not at all. If he keeps this stat pace and W's keep coming it will take care of itself. I honestly don't care if he gets an invite, wins it or whatever. I just want wins for OSU.
  • dwccrew
    cats gone wild;489597 wrote:Hey guys, its only 3 weeks and only playing cupcakes. Its "too early" to start a thread like this..........

    And on a serious note, I know OSU fans are biased for Pryor to win Heisman, but he is not in the top 2 so far. Just sayin......

    I will be bias and say that P. Peterson from LSU should win Heisman and has improved a bunch.........:)

    Miami is a cupcake? Also, while OSU fans are biased about Pryor winning the Heisman, he is being mentioned by many (other than OSU fans) as a Heisman favorite, while Peterson is not. So your comparison is shit.
  • cats gone wild
    dwccrew;489644 wrote:Miami is a cupcake?.
    Sorry, Miami is a cupcake with sprinkles on top.
  • dwccrew
    cats gone wild;489662 wrote:Sorry, Miami is a cupcake with sprinkles on top.

    Maybe they are, maybe they aren't; but your team has played nothing but cupcakes as well (and sturggled against depleted cupcake UNC), just like every top team has played cupcakes at this point. The difference is OSU has looked good playing against their cupcakes.
  • cats gone wild
    dwccrew;489672 wrote:Maybe they are, maybe they aren't; but your team has played nothing but cupcakes as well (and sturggled against depleted cupcake UNC), just like every top team has played cupcakes at this point. The difference is OSU has looked good playing against their cupcakes.
    I would take playing UNC and 2 SEC teams over Miami and 2 no names. I mean, Bowling Green even killed Marshall. LSU has gave up a total of 10 points combined the last 2 games. Next week, LSU play WVU while OSU plays another nobody.
  • Tiger2003
    cats gone wild;489803 wrote:I would take playing UNC and 2 SEC teams over Miami and 2 no names. I mean, Bowling Green even killed Marshall. LSU has gave up a total of 10 points combined the last 2 games. Next week, LSU play WVU while OSU plays another nobody.

    Vandy got beat by Northwestern at Vandy.
  • karen lotz
    Tiger2003;489810 wrote:Vandy got beat by Northwestern at Vandy.


    Marshall got throttled by BGSU, OU lost to Toledo in Athens.
  • dwccrew
    cats gone wild;489803 wrote:I would take playing UNC and 2 SEC teams over Miami and 2 no names. I mean, Bowling Green even killed Marshall. LSU has gave up a total of 10 points combined the last 2 games. Next week, LSU play WVU while OSU plays another nobody.

    A UNC team with 13 players out, many of whom were starters? Laughable. I'll give you that Ohio is terrible and that Marshall is not that good either, but don't come on here and say Miss. St, Vandy and UNC (with 13 players out) are as good as Miami. Plus, OSU was never in trouble in any of their games, LSU snuck by a depleted UNC team.

    Vandy is shit, Miss. St is shit and UNC with all the players out is shit.
  • TheMightyGators
    dwccrew;489821 wrote:A UNC team with 13 players out, many of whom were starters? Laughable. I'll give you that Ohio is terrible and that Marshall is not that good either, but don't come on here and say Miss. St, Vandy and UNC (with 13 players out) are as good as Miami. Plus, OSU was never in trouble in any of their games, LSU snuck by a depleted UNC team.

    Vandy is shit, Miss. St is shit and UNC with all the players out is shit.

    Isn't the thread about Pryor and not how well OSU played? In my opinion Pryor didn't play that well against Miami.
  • Tiger2003
    karen lotz;489812 wrote:Marshall got throttled by BGSU, OU lost to Toledo in Athens.

    Look all I was saying is Northwester beat Vandy....

    Nobody in the country right now can say they have played a tough schedule.
  • Tiger2003
    TheMightyGators;489827 wrote:Isn't the thread about Pryor and not how well OSU played? In my opinion Pryor didn't play that well against Miami.

    I agree 346 yards of offense with 2 touchdowns and 0 int is not playing well. Yes he missed some passes, but he did not turn the ball over.

    Miami Offense 352 Yards 1 Touchdown 4 turnovers
    Pryor 346 Yards 2 touchdowns 0 turnovers
  • karen lotz
    What do you make of his 2 TO's against OU?
  • Automatik
    Tiger2003;489849 wrote:I agree 346 yards of offense with 2 touchdowns and 0 int is not playing well. Yes he missed some passes, but he did not turn the ball over.

    Miami Offense 352 Yards 1 Touchdown 4 turnovers
    Pryor 346 Yards 2 touchdowns 0 turnovers

    lol....I doubt he even watched....don't even bother. I agree...he did have a few poor passes. He was the leading rusher in the game....how terrible. :rolleyes:

    As for the picks yesterday....it happens. They were his first turnovers of the year and no fumbles so far. Thankfully it was against OU and they were already rolling.
  • Tiger2003
    karen lotz;489851 wrote:What do you make of his 2 TO's against OU?
    Dumb mistakes!!! Trying to force plays that wernt there. Honestly for that stretch he looked like the Young Pryor.

    What do you makw of the fake field goal by Michigan State and the 2 Irish players falling down?
  • karen lotz
    Curious as to what that has to do with the thread entitled "Terrelle Pryor"??
  • Automatik
    Lets keep the thread on topic for once eh?

    I'm excited for the Wisky game on Oct 16th. Pryor has shown he can perform big on the road and this will be a big one!
  • Tiger2003
    Automatik;489863 wrote:Lets keep the thread on topic for once eh?

    I'm excited for the Wisky game on Oct 16th. Pryor has shown he can perform big on the road and this will be a big one!

    I agree. if your remember last time we were up there, Pryor as freshman lead the Bucks on a game winning drive.
  • LJ
    Tiger2003;489866 wrote:I agree. if your remember last time we were up there, Pryor as freshman lead the Bucks on a game winning drive.

    Pretty sure Beanie was the leader of that huddle though.
  • Big Gain
    thedynasty1998;488686 wrote:How impressed have you been with Pryor this year? And do you think he has a future in the NFL?

    I was discussing this after the game today with some friends. I've been at the last two games, and I think you can judge QB's a lot better in person compared to on TV because you can see the whole field and get a better sense of the velocity of throws.

    I've been really impressed with Pryor this year and the improvements he has made each year. However, people were talking on here about him potentially leaving early and I just don't see it. I don't see how he plays QB in the NFL.

    Also, I think that he is still the front runner for the Heisman. I really think OSU runs the table and if they do, that puts Pryor on the very short list.

    What are your thoughts on Pryor?
    He is a MUCH better QB than he was at this point last year. It is logical for that to be the case.

    There isn't a single College QB in the country ready for the NFL now, especially not the third year JUNIORS. You can count on one hand, the Senior QB's that got drafted, played right away and were successful. The vast majority of NFL QB's that end up being starters take several years before they are successful.

    Therefore it is extremely silly to make assumptions on what kind of a QB Pryor will be 5 years from now. There isn't even a NFL scout in the country who would be foolish enough to GUESS at what Pryor will be like 5 years from now.

    Pryor has already been talking to the other Juniors on the team demanding a promise from them to come back for their Senior year because he is.

    BTW, I could give a shat who is being considered for the Heisman. The only thing that matters is who wins the Heisman. They don't give a trophy for 2nd place. I don't think any underclassman should receive the Heisman.
  • Tiger2003
    LJ;489877 wrote:Pretty sure Beanie was the leader of that huddle though.

    Beanie was the leader of that team, but Pryor made the plays down the stretch...
  • LJ
    Tiger2003;489881 wrote:Beanie was the leader of that team, but Pryor made the plays down the stretch...

    You can't discredit him for making the plays. I was just saying that Beanie was the leader of the team and the one who got Pryor going. This time it is all on Pryor's shoulders
  • Big Gain
    karen lotz;489851 wrote:What do you make of his 2 TO's against OU?
    If the game had been close you would never had seen those passes from Pryor. Ohio State had a big lead, he knew he wasn't going to have many more chances, so he was trying for big plays. He would be the first person to tell you they were dumb mistakes.
  • Big Gain
    Ty Webb;489533 wrote:He has looked ok this year....nothing special

    His future in the NFL is as a WR/Wildcat QB
    Don't you ever get tired of the pitiful existence you have chosen for your life?