Archive

I'm done with this site...

  • O-Trap
    vball10set;1228325 wrote:His starting the thread prompted the whining, and that's why I said if he had a problem with you, then he should have taken the complaint TO you. The whining has been a direct reaction to his action, even if hasn't done the majority of it.
    Certainly true, but if he was genuinely frustrated, he may have created the thread with something else in mind.

    I wanna give him the benefit of the doubt.
  • superman
    As much as I like and respect O-Trap. He does look like a bitch here.

    Also, if you're going to do nicknames for him be original. qq-trap is lame. Try Ovary-trap or O-crap.
  • hoops23
    vball10set;1228284 wrote:If hoops23 feels he was fucked, then he should go to the source and take care of it--why the fuck whine about it in a thread?
    First of all, fuck you.

    Second of all, I did go to the source. I also created a thread to display the bullshit. If somebody has a problem with something, it's best to bring it out front. Both mine and DW's bans were bullshit and unwarranted. The poit of this thread was to bring my issue to the forefront. I didn't do any whining. I expressed my opinion on the moderating and how trigger happy it has become. You literally can not joke with anybody on SB any more without fear of being banned.

    If you have a problem with it, why Ben read the thread, genius?
  • hoops23
    My last post was riddled with iPhone typos and I'm not able to edit them. The point is there though.
  • O-Trap
    superman;1228365 wrote:As much as I like and respect O-Trap. He does look like a bitch here.

    Also, if you're going to do nicknames for him be original. qq-trap is lame. Try Ovary-trap or O-crap.
    I've gotten O-crap before (back on JJ, when I was relatively new to the site). It wouldn't be original, but at least there is a precedent set.
  • BRF
    superman;1228365 wrote:
    Also, if you're going to do nicknames for him be original. qq-trap is lame. Try Ovary-trap or O-crap.
    How about my nickname for him: O - "why don't you shut your" trap?

    :D

    I know O-trap from way back. As you can see, he's a member of the Wayne County gang.

    He's a good guy just trying to do his job. IMO, he saw people saying f you to each other and decided to draw the line.

    To Hoops23: I know you are a good guy and I get it how you posted back. I don't want you to leave because I enjoy reading your posts on the Tribe threads and our banter back and forth. Don't' let this stop you.
  • superman
    O-Trap;1228382 wrote:I've gotten O-crap before (back on JJ, when I was relatively new to the site). It wouldn't be original, but at least there is a precedent set.
    At least ovary-trap was new
  • superman
    BRF;1228385 wrote:
    He's a good guy just trying to do his job.
    It was a bitch move.
  • O-Trap
    superman;1228391 wrote:At least ovary-trap was new

    I like it. I say we go with that one.
  • pmoney25
    Im not sure what is worse, Internet infractions or grown men crying about internet infractions
  • j_crazy
    O trap is wrong. And whoever he consulted is wrong. Hopefully someone can fix these 2.
  • like_that
    jordo212000;1228289 wrote:I find myself posting less and less because of like_that and CoA.

    Half of my rep bars have come from posts directed at you. Despite the intentions of your post, people will more likely be thanking CoA and I for contributing to your depleting post count than they will chastise us for it. There is no hiding the fact that you are an obvious douche bag, and everyone frowns upon your arrival in Cleveland threads. That's nobody's fault except for yourself, for being a classic passive aggressive douche bag. (I will most likely get some reps for this post as well. Keep believing only a select few dislike you. There are MANY that despise you, however they choose not to publicly express it).

    For any mods, turdo is a prime example of a poster who should be thread banned from particular threads. He is banned, there are no problems. He is the king of derailing threads. The funniest part is he carries on with his act as if nobody notices his passive aggressive bullshit.

    Other than that, the Cleveland threads are great. There might be some 1-3 page bitch fests here and there, but we know who to self moderate our threads. We also aren't a bunch of pussies. We can go at each others throats one argument, then 4 pages later we are having a friendly discussion. BR and I have gone at it a few times, especially this offseason, yet we still get along and I still consider him one of the better posters on this site. We didn't need any power hungry shit bag mods to moderate our arguments, and wes knew this (not this wes is a shit bag).
    O-Trap;1228316 wrote:

    Ah, so would you say they've got the potential to drive people away from the site with how they've acted on here? Interesting.
    See above regarding jordo.
  • O-Trap
    like_that;1228445 wrote:See above regarding jordo.
    That may or may not be. I'm rarely in the forums you guys are in, sans the basement, and I don't think I've ever really interacted with jordo.
  • Commander of Awesome
    O-Trap;1228455 wrote:That may or may not be. I'm rarely in the forums you guys are in, sans the basement, and I don't think I've ever really interacted with jordo.
    My god you're still trying to save face? LMAO just admit your fail, you jumped the gun when you had no business doing so, and move on. This is getting embarrassing.
  • O-Trap
    Commander of Awesome;1228465 wrote:My god you're still trying to save face? LMAO just admit your fail, you jumped the gun when you had no business doing so, and move on. This is getting embarrassing.
    What are you talking about saving face? I answered his question, as it was directed at me.

    I admit I was consistent. Why would I be embarrassed at that? If I sounded like a high school kid, I might, but I've not been the one on this thread acting that way.
  • sportchampps
    I really wish we could neg rep
  • Commander of Awesome
    O-Trap;1228226 wrote:Just because somebody's going to complain doesn't mean I should base anything off who complains. If someone wants to throw a tantrum like a toddler, that's up to them, and if they're going to do that, I don't really care what forum they post on or how frequently.
    O-Trap;1228217 wrote:A sophomoric threat. I'm quivering.



    Your opinion holds nothing when virtually everyone sees you as an Internet hardass who doesn't phrase anything that would take more than five brain cells to rub together.
    O-Trap;1228468 wrote:
    I admit I was consistent. Why would I be embarrassed at that? If I sounded like a high school kid, I might, but I've not been the one on this thread acting that way.
    hypocrisy at its finest. Nice fail.
  • O-Trap
    Commander of Awesome;1228487 wrote:hypocrisy at its finest. Nice fail.
    Nothing I said in those quotes was untrue. In a literal sense, the logic you were trying to use was sophomoric. It had nothing to do with the name-calling you're so used to wielding, as is only further evidenced by this thread.

    Whether I was right or wrong with the infractions, your lack of defensible though, or at least your lack of formulating a post contesting my actions with any defensible logic, and resorting to silly ad hominems and nonsensical retorts that sound like a 21st century Bill & Ted.

    Your schtick might work with high school stoners or frat boys, but to normal adults, your whole repetitive (as well as decade-old) "pwn" and "fail" routine is adolescent at best.
  • jordo212000
    like_that;1228445 wrote:Half of my rep bars have come from posts directed at you. Despite the intentions of your post, people will more likely be thanking CoA and I for contributing to your depleting post count than they will chastise us for it. There is no hiding the fact that you are an obvious douche bag, and everyone frowns upon your arrival in Cleveland threads. That's nobody's fault except for yourself, for being a classic passive aggressive douche bag. (I will most likely get some reps for this post as well. Keep believing only a select few dislike you. There are MANY that despise you, however they choose not to publicly express it).

    For any mods, turdo is a prime example of a poster who should be thread banned from particular threads. He is banned, there are no problems. He is the king of derailing threads. The funniest part is he carries on with his act as if nobody notices his passive aggressive bullshit.

    Other than that, the Cleveland threads are great. There might be some 1-3 page bitch fests here and there, but we know who to self moderate our threads. We also aren't a bunch of pussies. We can go at each others throats one argument, then 4 pages later we are having a friendly discussion. BR and I have gone at it a few times, especially this offseason, yet we still get along and I still consider him one of the better posters on this site. We didn't need any power hungry shit bag mods to moderate our arguments, and wes knew this (not this wes is a shit bag).



    See above regarding jordo.

    I'm not popular in those threads because I keep things real
  • Commander of Awesome
    O-Trap;1228507 wrote:
    Your schtick might work with high school stoners or frat boys, but to normal adults, your whole repetitive (as well as decade-old) "pwn" and "fail" routine is adolescent at best.
    Must be a whole site of HS stoners then, lolfail on not knowing your audience, bc I'm #1 in reps. Also pwn, lolfail, etc... are all catch phrases that have caught on. Not surprised based on your modding abilities (lack of any knowledge on posters in the board) that you fail to understand this.
  • like_that
    jordo212000;1228508 wrote:I'm not popular in those threads because I keep things real
    Being a passive agressive troll is not keeping things real. I see you continue to be a delusional douche though. You bring absolutely nothing to those threads, thus why you get ZERO positive feedback.
  • O-Trap
    Commander of Awesome;1228510 wrote:Must be a whole site of HS stoners then, lolfail on not knowing your audience, bc I'm #1 in reps. Also pwn, lolfail, etc... are all catch phrases that have caught on. Not surprised based on your modding abilities (lack of any knowledge on posters in the board) that you fail to understand this.
    They caught on ten years ago. I was using them then, when I was a teenager. That's when those terms are expected ("appropriate" is debatable if you want to be taken seriously). Not as an adult.

    As for the "whole site of stoners," the number of reps you have doesn't directly correlate to the number of DIFFERENT people who have repped you. I assumed you could put that together ... that a circle jerk between 4-5 posters could get the same results.

    Also, #1 in reps? Congratulations. Good for you. Your parents must be proud. Honestly, what kind of person keeps track of who is #1 in reps?

    Moreover, suppose you had the most DIVERSE group of "reppers" (for lack of a better term). Appealing to the lowest common denominator tends to make for popularity, but I daresay it's rarely taken seriously by the more intelligent half of that proverbial spectrum. Once again, something I figured you could put together.
  • Commander of Awesome
    7 different ppl have repped me in the past 3 days, including you. Nice fail there hombre (see what I did there? A bill and ted pwn). You act is becoming more heinous (lol did it again).

    Glad to see the rep comment got under your skin. So vain.
  • O-Trap
    Commander of Awesome;1228522 wrote:7 different ppl have repped me in the past 3 days, including you.
    I'm sure I'd still think you deserved it. And I'm not sure what seven people has to do with being the super awesome #1 repped poster of all time on Ohio Chatter, as I'm assuming you've been repped by plenty more than that.

    Perhaps I was too subtle. I said you COULD replicate that result with 4-5 guys. I didn't say you did. My point was that being the #1 most repped doesn't mean everybody likes you or what you say.
    Commander of Awesome;1228522 wrote:Nice fail there hombre (see what I did there? A bill and ted pwn). You act is becoming more heinous (lol did it again).
    I'm a little surprised you're old enough to remember them. I was afraid my reference went over your head. Glad to know it didn't ... and yet sad to know that someone old enough to remember Bill & Ted is still using the word "pwn" in a sentence, like above. I didn't think I'd find someone that old who was still using outdated teen language, thinking he will be taken seriously.
    Commander of Awesome;1228522 wrote: Glad to see the rep comment got under your skin. So vain.
    Not at all. Caught me off guard that anyone actually follows the number of reps they have, but now that I think about it, I suppose it makes more sense from someone who incessantly has to try to tell the world anytime he "pwns" someone.
  • rmolin73
    Hahaha #1 in reps get the fuck outta here!