The most dominant athlete in all of TEAM sports? v. RIGHT NOW

• rock_knutne

  Wow, the idiots are out in full force today. This thread has become a joke, you can't even have a legitimate discussion here anymore, especially when dolts like "never played sports and loves men" and "strap on" start with their idiotic bullshit. Too bad.
• Automatik

  

  Rock...take my advice.
  
  GIVE. IT. UP.
• Raw Dawgin' it

  

  rock_knutne;618143 wrote:Typical dumbass response from "Strap On", brings nothing to the table but flaming. See what I did there?

  
  I'm flaming you for trying to argue points without facts. Here's another flame, the only "Strap On" is the one your wifes uses to pound your ass every night? That's me flaming you.
  
  For the record the name was Jamaal-Raheem...but it got banned because i gave the mods the finger and told them crosby sucked.
• Raw Dawgin' it

  

  And i wasn't trolling or "flamming" as you say...you said player A was better than player B...i used FACTS to dispute your argument.
• rock_knutne

  Raw Dawgin' it;618147 wrote:I'm flaming you for trying to argue points without facts. Here's another flame, the only "Strap On" is the one your wifes uses to pound your ass every night? That's me flaming you.
  
  For the record the name was Jamaal-Raheem...but it got banned because i gave the mods the finger and told them crosby sucked.

  
  Looks like you'll be looking for another username pretty soon you dick!
• Raw Dawgin' it

  

  rock_knutne;618145 wrote:Wow, the idiots are out in full force today. This thread has become a joke, you can't even have a legitimate discussion here anymore, especially when dolts like "never played sports and loves men" and "strap on" start with their idiotic bullshit. Too bad.

  Only idiot bullshit you speak of is you getting pissed because only the crosby show (pitt fan and homer) agreed with your statement
• rock_knutne

  Raw Dawgin' it;618150 wrote:And i wasn't trolling or "flamming" as you say...you said player A was better than player B...i used FACTS to dispute your argument.

  
  What FACTS did you use asswhipe. It was all opinion, get a fucking clue!
• Automatik

  

  rock_knutne;618153 wrote:What FACTS did you use asswhipe. It was all opinion, get a fucking clue!

  
  Um how about the point reference?
  
  You're argument consisted of if this, if that.
• Raw Dawgin' it

  

  rock_knutne;618153 wrote:What FACTS did you use asswhipe. It was all opinion, get a fucking clue!

  These facts
  
  1) Gretzky would be the all time point leader without scoring a single goal - Fact! Look it up, it's simple adding and subtracting - retards in helmets can do it, so can you
  
  2) Lets do the math here - Mario is 1,100 points away from the Great Ones record - say he played all 82 games for 5 years he missed - 410 games - he would've had to AVERAGE 2.7 points per game!! Gretzky in his entire career didn't even average 2! Even with missing time, even with the different style of play, no way in hell Mario would've SHATTERED anything ANYTHING Gretzky did.
  
  The math above is based on if Mario played full seasons of the ones he missed. So based on your hypothetical argument, i did math and put down a FACT that he would've need to average almost 3 points a game to just TIE the great one...let alone SHATTER anything.
  
  you sir are a FAILURE
• Automatik

  

  Raw Dawgin' it;618169 wrote:These facts
  
  1) Gretzky would be the all time point leader without scoring a single goal - Fact! Look it up, it's simple adding and subtracting - retards in helmets can do it, so can you
  
  2) Lets do the math here - Mario is 1,100 points away from the Great Ones record - say he played all 82 games for 5 years he missed - 410 games - he would've had to AVERAGE 2.7 points per game!! Gretzky in his entire career didn't even average 2! Even with missing time, even with the different style of play, no way in hell Mario would've SHATTERED anything ANYTHING Gretzky did.
  
  The math above is based on if Mario played full seasons of the ones he missed. So based on your hypothetical argument, i did math and put down a FACT that he would've need to average almost 3 points a game to just TIE the great one...let alone SHATTER anything.
  
  you sir are a FAILURE

  Are you really Strap On? If so...props. That was what I call a schooling....hell, I thought you were only capable of hating and trolling.
• Raw Dawgin' it

  

  I'm not strap on! Seriously. I was Jamaal-Raheem - I was banned from posting because i was trolling the pitt thread and gave people the finger and called crosby a vagina.
• rock_knutne

  Raw Dawgin' it;618169 wrote:These facts
  
  1) Gretzky would be the all time point leader without scoring a single goal - Fact! Look it up, it's simple adding and subtracting - retards in helmets can do it, so can you
  
  2) Lets do the math here - Mario is 1,100 points away from the Great Ones record - say he played all 82 games for 5 years he missed - 410 games - he would've had to AVERAGE 2.7 points per game!! Gretzky in his entire career didn't even average 2! Even with missing time, even with the different style of play, no way in hell Mario would've SHATTERED anything ANYTHING Gretzky did.
  
  The math above is based on if Mario played full seasons of the ones he missed. So based on your hypothetical argument, i did math and put down a FACT that he would've need to average almost 3 points a game to just TIE the great one...let alone SHATTER anything.
  
  you sir are a FAILURE

  
  I just looked it up, Lemieux only played 915 out of a potential 1,428 regular season NHL games in his career and that doesn't include the three year layoff when he retired. Do your fucking math now!
• Automatik

  

  Your argument is still purely hypothetical. In the real world that means INVALID.
• rock_knutne

  Automatik;618189 wrote:Your argument is still purely hypothetical. In the real world that means INVALID.

  
  I never said it wasn't. All I'm saying is if Lemieux JUST stays healthy, forget about having goons to protect him or a great team built around him, he shatters those records. BTW, sports and talking about sports isn't the real world!
• Commander of Awesome

  

  Raw Dawgin' it;618169 wrote:These facts
  
  1) Gretzky would be the all time point leader without scoring a single goal - Fact! Look it up, it's simple adding and subtracting - retards in helmets can do it, so can you
  
  2) Lets do the math here - Mario is 1,100 points away from the Great Ones record - say he played all 82 games for 5 years he missed - 410 games - he would've had to AVERAGE 2.7 points per game!! Gretzky in his entire career didn't even average 2! Even with missing time, even with the different style of play, no way in hell Mario would've SHATTERED anything ANYTHING Gretzky did.
  
  The math above is based on if Mario played full seasons of the ones he missed. So based on your hypothetical argument, i did math and put down a FACT that he would've need to average almost 3 points a game to just TIE the great one...let alone SHATTER anything.
  
  you sir are a FAILURE

  pwned.
• Raw Dawgin' it

  

  rock_knutne;618183 wrote:I just looked it up, Lemieux only played 915 out of a potential 1,428 regular season NHL games in his career and that doesn't include the three year layoff when he retired. Do your fucking math now!

  
  Oh so he missed 513 games - Still would've had to average OVER 2 points a game for 6 seasons to TIE...to just TIE!!!! Not even close to shatter. There's the math stupid.
• Automatik

  

  rock_knutne;618195 wrote:I never said it wasn't. All I'm saying is if Lemieux JUST stays healthy, forget about having goons to protect him or a great team built around him, he shatters those records. BTW, sports and talking about sports isn't the real world!

  
  And you really believe that?
• IronCity

  

  Gotta love these Cleveland fans trolling because they have nothing else.
• Raw Dawgin' it

  

  IronCity;618207 wrote:Gotta love these Cleveland fans trolling because they have nothing else.

  Wow, talk about a comment that has no other purpose other than to start something. That would indeed be trolling right? Way to go.
• SportsAndLady

  

  Pretty sure injuries go into how great an athlete is. I mean, you could be the best quarterback in the world, but if you're injured, you're not great at all. You can't say "oh well Lemieux only played 900 out of 1400 games" to prove how great he was...as a matter of fact it just proves the opposite, that his injuries faltered him and it made him less of a player.
• IronCity

  

  Raw Dawgin' it;618211 wrote:Wow, talk about a comment that has no other purpose other than to start something. That would indeed be trolling right? Way to go.

  
  It's called facts. Go worry about the Draft.
• Raw Dawgin' it

  

  IronCity;618222 wrote:It's called facts. Go worry about the Draft.

  
  Arguing with rock may have made me a little retarded...but i have no idea what facts you want or what draft you're talking about.
• rock_knutne

  SportsAndLady;618219 wrote:Pretty sure injuries go into how great an athlete is. I mean, you could be the best quarterback in the world, but if you're injured, you're not great at all. You can't say "oh well Lemieux only played 900 out of 1400 games" to prove how great he was...as a matter of fact it just proves the opposite, that his injuries faltered him and it made him less of a player.

  
  So cancer and major back surgery limiting one's career proves the opposite of how great someone could have been? GTFO!
• SportsAndLady

  

  rock_knutne;618241 wrote:So cancer and major back surgery limiting one's career proves the opposite of how great someone could have been? GTFO!

  
  We're not talking about how great they could have been..the argument is who was better.
• rock_knutne

  Automatik;618205 wrote:And you really believe that?

  
  Believe that Lemieux shatters those records? Yes I do, IF he stays healthy.
  
  I don't understand why you can't have an opinion on something, especially when it would not be out of the realm of possibility.