Archive

ESPN's 30 for 30

  • DeyDurkie5
    ccrunner609 wrote: I cant wait till 9pm. If they even mention Jordan or the Bulls you will hear from me.
    I honestly think I will hang myself if you post on here about it :(
  • Upper90
    This is a dumb argument even by dumb argument standards.

    The U was awesome. Len Bias might be my favorite. This is a great reminder, as I forgot all about this one, I'll have to set the DVR.
  • trackandccrunner
    DeyDurkie5 wrote:
    ccrunner609 wrote: I cant wait till 9pm. If they even mention Jordan or the Bulls you will hear from me.
    I honestly think I will hang myself if you post on here about it :(
    Will you make a video and put it on youtube?
  • DeyDurkie5
    trackandccrunner wrote:
    DeyDurkie5 wrote:
    ccrunner609 wrote: I cant wait till 9pm. If they even mention Jordan or the Bulls you will hear from me.
    I honestly think I will hang myself if you post on here about it :(
    Will you make a video and put it on youtube?
    Without a doubt, with the title being "ccrunner is still wrong"
  • trackandccrunner
    This one has certainly been the most entertaining one so far.
  • Trueblue23
    The one about Len Bias was the best IMO.

    They've all been pretty good, kudos to ESPN
  • DeyDurkie5
    This is awesome, the Spike Lee back story is so good haha...I didn't realize how insanely racist fans were back then with no resistance from the pacers staff/security
  • DeyDurkie5
    Trueblue23 wrote: The one about Len Bias was the best IMO.

    They've all been pretty good, kudos to ESPN
    watched that one after a night of "partying" and haven't touched the stuff since lol
  • trackandccrunner
    DeyDurkie5 wrote: This is awesome, the Spike Lee back story is so good haha...I didn't realize how insanely racist fans were back then with no resistance from the pacers staff/security
    I remember it being bad I just didnt remember it was that bad haha.
  • DeyDurkie5
    ccrunner609 wrote:
    DeyDurkie5 wrote:
    ccrunner609 wrote: Reggie bitching about having Jordan take all of the titles.................should be a good show.
    That isn't what it is about, more about reggie against the knicks...nice try though turd

    Like I know what the fuck this show is about? Where in the fuck in this thread does it say that its all about the fucking Knicks?

    When they mention great players not winning titles I will remember your dumbass post.


    ummmm you were saying jackass? lol
  • Trueblue23
    LMAO @ the argument
  • DeyDurkie5
    ccrunner609 wrote: The last thing Reggie said made my point.......I am done. Learn how to make threads.
    hahahahhaha yeah I bet
  • trackandccrunner
    LOL. That is all that need to be said.
  • Upper90
    Sad.

    Not the documentary, I actually think that was fantastic. Probably my new favorite one.
  • ou1980
    Wow....

    I saw that the thread had 54 replies and expected that this episode was really cool...

    What I got instead was a thread where 90% of the comments were childish bull@#$# that had nothing to due with the show...
  • Laley23
    Mr. Madison(deydurk and cc), what you have just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard(read). At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in(on) this room(forum) is now dumber for having listened(read) to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
  • DeyDurkie5
    Laley23 wrote: Mr. Madison(deydurk and cc), what you have just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard(read). At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in(on) this room(forum) is now dumber for having listened(read) to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
    nuh uh....
  • 3reppom
    This was one of the better 30 for 30 joints. But for sheer entertainment and enjoyment The U is the pick
  • hoops23
    This was the best 30 for 30 and it's not even close, at least imo..

    Really brought me back to when I was growing up as a youngster watching the NBA and how heated some of the rivalries got..
  • chicago510
    LTrain23 wrote: This was the best 30 for 30 and it's not even close, at least imo..

    Really brought me back to when I was growing up as a youngster watching the NBA and how heated some of the rivalries got..
    It was a really cool documentary, but my roommate, who just started following the NBA in the last few years was like...so how many championships did these teams wind up winning?

    I answered zero, neither Miller nor Ewing has a ring. (Go Bulls!)

    He said, so why did they make a 90 minute documentary about them battling it out in the early playoff rounds?

    I really had no response. But it was still pretty sweet.
  • ptown_trojans_1
    chicago510 wrote:
    LTrain23 wrote: This was the best 30 for 30 and it's not even close, at least imo..

    Really brought me back to when I was growing up as a youngster watching the NBA and how heated some of the rivalries got..
    It was a really cool documentary, but my roommate, who just started following the NBA in the last few years was like...so how many championships did these teams wind up winning?

    I answered zero, neither Miller nor Ewing has a ring. (Go Bulls!)

    He said, so why did they make a 90 minute documentary about them battling it out in the early playoff rounds?

    I really had no response. But it was still pretty sweet.
    Because, it was great basketball. Some of the best I'd argue.

    I loved it. Like others, it brought me back to the days when I loved the NBA. Those Pacers and Knick teams were sick. BTW, someone needs to do a documentary on the Rockets during that time period too.

    My gf, who is not an NBA fan watched it with me and really enjoyed it as well. She said why isn't the NBA like that now? I had no response.
  • raiderbuck
    chicago510 wrote:
    LTrain23 wrote: This was the best 30 for 30 and it's not even close, at least imo..

    Really brought me back to when I was growing up as a youngster watching the NBA and how heated some of the rivalries got..
    It was a really cool documentary, but my roommate, who just started following the NBA in the last few years was like...so how many championships did these teams wind up winning?

    I answered zero, neither Miller nor Ewing has a ring. (Go Bulls!)

    He said, so why did they make a 90 minute documentary about them battling it out in the early playoff rounds?

    I really had no response. But it was still pretty sweet.

    lol, this is why he doesn't get it. I loved this documentary because it was about two teams and two players that I despised growing up: Reggie Miller and John Starks. I HATED both of them...lol. Growing up I would always be Jordan, and whomever was guarding me was either Miller or Starks.
  • Nate
    It's like a Special Olympics Wrestling match in here.
  • detectivegibbles
    Very well done by ESPN. This was when the NBA was great.

    I still watch the Cavs when they play, but the fans are just not into games like they were back then.
  • Glory Days
    chicago510 wrote:
    LTrain23 wrote: This was the best 30 for 30 and it's not even close, at least imo..

    Really brought me back to when I was growing up as a youngster watching the NBA and how heated some of the rivalries got..
    It was a really cool documentary, but my roommate, who just started following the NBA in the last few years was like...so how many championships did these teams wind up winning?

    I answered zero, neither Miller nor Ewing has a ring. (Go Bulls!)

    He said, so why did they make a 90 minute documentary about them battling it out in the early playoff rounds?

    I really had no response. But it was still pretty sweet.
    because if it wasnt for watching this rivalry, i wouldnt give a flying crap about basketball right now. and as you can see, i became a reggie miller fan out of all of it.