Ohio Chatter DEV

FatHobbit

...hire someone who was pregnant?

LJ

FatHobbit;898494 wrote:...hire someone who was pregnant?

Pregnancy is a protected class broheim

FatHobbit

LJ;898497 wrote:Pregnancy is a protected class broheim

So you would hire someone who was pregnant? Or would you find someone who was "better" qualified? The market is pretty much saturated with people looking for a job. It wouldn't be that hard I think.

LJ

FatHobbit;898498 wrote:So you would hire someone who was pregnant? Or would you find someone who was "better" qualified? The market is pretty much saturated with people looking for a job. It wouldn't be that hard I think.

I would hire the best person for the job

Little Danny

I would hire the person with the pierced hooha!

bigkahuna

LJ;898500 wrote:I would hire the best person for the job

This. It's pretty cut and dry.

TBone14

LJ;898500 wrote:I would hire the best person for the job

bigkahuna;898508 wrote:This. It's pretty cut and dry.

Agreed with this. Not hiring someone because they are preggo is the same as not hiring someone because they are Black or Jewish or whatever. Many discrimination lawsuits have been won by pregnant women.

Belly35

Single or married ? Just for future potential...

FatHobbit

Belly35;898522 wrote:Single or married ? Just for future potential...

married

Heretic

FatHobbit;898525 wrote:married

Married in a prude "I'm all about my husband" way or married in a cool "I'll do ANYTHING for you, boss" way?

FatHobbit

Heretic;898527 wrote:Married in a prude "I'm all about my husband" way or married in a cool "I'll do ANYTHING for you, boss" way?

The prude version.

gorocks99

FatHobbit;898532 wrote:The prude version.

Damn. (╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻

Heretic

FatHobbit;898532 wrote:The prude version.

So...both married and prude/faithful...

And what is the point of this again? Is she at least hot enough (or, since currently pregnant, projected as being hot without the living bowling ball connected to her) to provide fap material?

SnotBubbles

Fuck you FatHobbit. The "Would You" title is to be used for ONLY voting on woman you would bang.

Someone negative rep this asshole for misuse of the board!

Fab4Runner

LJ;898500 wrote:I would hire the best person for the job

bigkahuna;898508 wrote:This. It's pretty cut and dry.

TBone14;898515 wrote:Agreed with this. Not hiring someone because they are preggo is the same as not hiring someone because they are Black or Jewish or whatever. Many discrimination lawsuits have been won by pregnant women.

All of this.

FatHobbit

SnotBubbles;898538 wrote:Fuck you FatHobbit. The "Would You" title is to be used for ONLY voting on woman you would bang.

Someone negative rep this asshole for misuse of the board!

My bad. I was unaware. Won't happen again.

wes_mantooth

Nope, I would only hire hot sluts

O-Trap

FatHobbit;898494 wrote:...hire someone who was pregnant?

If you don't hire someone just because they're pregnant, you'll find yourself with a lawsuit.

What's the surrounding circumstance to this question? What's the job, etc.?

FatHobbit

O-Trap;898582 wrote:What's the surrounding circumstance to this question? What's the job, etc.?

I know someone who is looking for a job and wants to have a baby. She is budgeting for the baby under the assumption that she will have a better job in nine months. I think she's going to have a hard time getting hired if she's obviously pregnant while she's interviewing.

Nate

Here's the deal, if she isn't employed for more than 12 months at the same place, she is not guaranteed FMLA leave I believe. Correct me if I'm wrong but that's what I understood of it.

O-Trap

FatHobbit;898586 wrote:I know someone who is looking for a job and wants to have a baby. She is budgeting for the baby under the assumption that she will have a better job in nine months. I think she's going to have a hard time getting hired if she's obviously pregnant while she's interviewing.

Friend of mine just got hired to a new job while she was pregnant. It's doable. If she's not REALLY qualified, though, good luck.

1_beast