Would you...
-
FatHobbit
yummyTiernan;898602 wrote:That's all we hire. I work at the Placenta Shake Shak. -
SnotBubbles
Just for anyone who had the same thoughts as me when opening this thread (and to stay in sync with the topic):
-
Devils Advocate
You effin sicko.....1_beast;898598 wrote:I'd hit it...(cant get her prego)
-
SnotBubbles
If what you're going for here is what it looks like you're going for here....this is the most disturbing post I've ever seen on here....:thumbdown:Devils Advocate;898611 wrote:You effin sicko.....
-
FatHobbit
Ever?!?SnotBubbles;898614 wrote:If what you're going for here is what it looks like you're going for here....this is the most disturbing post I've ever seen on here....:thumbdown: -
O-Trap
He must not remember bananapeel. I still have nightmares about what that guy posted.FatHobbit;898621 wrote:Ever?!? -
ernest_t_bass
This is what I don't like. It's almost like, if they are pregnant, you should almost just GIVE them the job. That way there will not be a discrimination law suit.TBone14;898515 wrote:Agreed with this. Not hiring someone because they are preggo is the same as not hiring someone because they are Black or Jewish or whatever. Many discrimination lawsuits have been won by pregnant women.
Here's a question, though. What if the final three candidates are pregnant, black, and jewish. Or what if you have one white guy, and one pregnant, black, jewish lady? -
ernest_t_bass
Reps... I agree. But it IS Tippy who posted it, so...SnotBubbles;898614 wrote:If what you're going for here is what it looks like you're going for here....this is the most disturbing post I've ever seen on here....:thumbdown: -
Devils Advocate
SnotBubbles;898614 wrote:If what you're going for here is what it looks like you're going for here....this is the most disturbing post I've ever seen on here....:thumbdown:
Why? What are you suggesting that I'm suggesting? :eek: -
queencitybuckeye
As a practical matter, this isn't completely accurate. You hire someone presumably because you have a job that needs to be done. Hiring someone pregnant means you are temporarily going to have that same gap in your organization in short order.TBone14;898515 wrote:Not hiring someone because they are preggo is the same as not hiring someone because they are Black or Jewish or whatever. -
Devils Advocate
Your old hard drive does as well :eek:O-Trap;898626 wrote:He must not remember bananapeel. I still have nightmares about what that guy posted.
-
ernest_t_bass
For what it's worth, so far I'm the only one that said I won't hire her.
-
O-Trap
No. Just have well-documented reasons for not hiring them. If they're not the best qualified job candidate, make sure you have point-by-point reasons why.ernest_t_bass;898627 wrote:This is what I don't like. It's almost like, if they are pregnant, you should almost just GIVE them the job. That way there will not be a discrimination law suit.
¿Que?Devils Advocate;898639 wrote:Your old hard drive does as well :eek: -
Devils Advocate
I'd say nothing then. You don't count.ernest_t_bass;898648 wrote:For what it's worth, so far I'm the only one that said I won't hire her. -
1_beast
she would have to blow me....ernest_t_bass;898648 wrote:For what it's worth, so far I'm the only one that said I won't hire her. -
O-Trap
Aww ... you're like low-hanging fruit for the ACLU.ernest_t_bass;898648 wrote:For what it's worth, so far I'm the only one that said I won't hire her. -
1_beast
Devils Advocate;898611 wrote:You effin sicko.....
NEG REPS THIIS SICK FUK -
O-Trap
Obviously.1_beast;898654 wrote:she would have to blow me.... -
Devils Advocate
O-Trap;898649 wrote: ¿Que?
-
SnotBubbles
To answer the question, I would NOT hire a pregnant woman.
-
Devils Advocate
You don't count either....
-
TBone14
Practicality and the law/EEO don't seem to match. Any reason for making job related decisions...ie..hiring, firing, promotion.. based on anything other than qualifications and work performance is discrimination in the eyes of the law. Fair or not..queencitybuckeye;898638 wrote:As a practical matter, this isn't completely accurate. You hire someone presumably because you have a job that needs to be done. Hiring someone pregnant means you are temporarily going to have that same gap in your organization in short order.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18742634/ns/business-personal_finance/t/pregnancy-discrimination-rise/ -
GOONx19
Haha. This. And reps.Little Danny;898501 wrote:I would hire the person with the pierced hooha! -
FatHobbit
Exactly my thought. Why would someone hire a pregnant woman when there are plenty of available candidates who aren't going to be on maternity leave in the near future? It would not be hard to pick someone else from the pile of applicants and find valid reasons for why they are better. If you're really trying to find a new job, why give them a reason up front to pick someone else?queencitybuckeye;898638 wrote:As a practical matter, this isn't completely accurate. You hire someone presumably because you have a job that needs to be done. Hiring someone pregnant means you are temporarily going to have that same gap in your organization in short order. -
tcarrier32
i wonder how many black jewish people there are.ernest_t_bass;898627 wrote:This is what I don't like. It's almost like, if they are pregnant, you should almost just GIVE them the job. That way there will not be a discrimination law suit.
Here's a question, though. What if the final three candidates are pregnant, black, and jewish. Or what if you have one white guy, and one pregnant, black, jewish lady?