Archive

Durkie's Adsense Help

  • O-Trap
    like_that;1329675 wrote:Just thread ban him then. Him telling people to GFT is no worse than said_failota trolling the browns any chance he gets.
    Dude did it on a ton of threads. It was a GFY meltdown, though I have to admit that I enjoy a silly meltdown from time to time.

    Durkie just wants to make sure we remember how serious the Internetz are.
  • DeyDurkie5
    O-Trap;1335207 wrote:Dude did it on a ton of threads. It was a GFY meltdown, though I have to admit that I enjoy a silly meltdown from time to time.

    Durkie just wants to make sure we remember how serious the Internetz are.

    I want the passive aggressive trolls to be treated the same as the ones who do the more in your face trolling(me, sleeper). Lotz, Speedofsand, cats, sjmvhcsh are all little bitches.
  • like_that
    DeyDurkie5;1335588 wrote:I want the passive aggressive trolls to be treated the same as the ones who do the more in your face trolling(me, sleeper). Lotz, Speedofsand, cats, sjmvhcsh are all little bitches.
    Add Jordo and Said onto that list.
  • O-Trap
    DeyDurkie5;1335588 wrote:I want the passive aggressive trolls to be treated the same as the ones who do the more in your face trolling(me, sleeper). Lotz, Speedofsand, cats, sjmvhcsh are all little bitches.
    They are in the things that are relevant to any treatment at all. Being a "troll" isn't against the rules, so whether you're a passive aggressive troll or a blatant troll doesn't matter. The rules that are in place apply to both.

    In a nutshell, unless something changed, nobody gives a shit whether or not someone is a troll or what kind of troll they are. I think the worst, most annoying trolls are the passive aggressive ones, but if they're not breaking any rules, I don't think anyone is going to do anything about them. Same applies to anyone else who you or I might find annoying.
  • said_aouita
    like_that;1335601 wrote:Add Jordo and Said onto that list.

    this:thumbup:
  • DeyDurkie5
    O-Trap;1335648 wrote:They are in the things that are relevant to any treatment at all. Being a "troll" isn't against the rules, so whether you're a passive aggressive troll or a blatant troll doesn't matter. The rules that are in place apply to both.

    In a nutshell, unless something changed, nobody gives a shit whether or not someone is a troll or what kind of troll they are. I think the worst, most annoying trolls are the passive aggressive ones, but if they're not breaking any rules, I don't think anyone is going to do anything about them. Same applies to anyone else who you or I might find annoying.
    I've named plenty of instances in this thread where the rules are being broken. Hopefully they were dealt with in a timely and efficient manner.
  • O-Trap
    DeyDurkie5;1336242 wrote:I've named plenty of instances in this thread where the rules are being broken. Hopefully they were dealt with in a timely and efficient manner.
    Which posts of yours show rules being broken? I'll check 'em out.
  • DeyDurkie5
    O-Trap;1336245 wrote:Which posts of yours show rules being broken? I'll check 'em out.
    You are in the thread with all the posts.


    also, mods please hold cats the dbag to this....http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?37994-The-National-Championship-1-Notre-Dame-vs.-2-Alabama-(Jan-7-Miami-FL)&p=1334705&viewfull=1#post1334705
  • O-Trap
    DeyDurkie5;1336251 wrote:You are in the thread with all the posts.


    also, mods please hold cats the dbag to this....http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?37994-The-National-Championship-1-Notre-Dame-vs.-2-Alabama-(Jan-7-Miami-FL)&p=1334705&viewfull=1#post1334705
    I see your posts calling out people for swearing, promoting suicide, using suicide as a post tactic, trolling, and being mean.

    What rule is being violated by any of those actions?
  • DeyDurkie5
    O-Trap;1336254 wrote:I see your posts calling out people for swearing, promoting suicide, using suicide as a post tactic, trolling, and being mean.

    What rule is being violated by any of those actions?

    It's violating the adsense rule of meanness. This site needs to be more like jj, and those things didn't fly at jj.
  • O-Trap
    DeyDurkie5;1336255 wrote:It's violating the adsense rule of meanness.
    AdSense is cool with meanness.
    DeyDurkie5;1336255 wrote:This site needs to be more like jj, and those things didn't fly at jj.
    Why not go to JJ's and just be a member there?
  • DeyDurkie5
    O-Trap;1336258 wrote:AdSense is cool with meanness.



    Why not go to JJ's and just be a member there?
    What rule does "go fuck yourself" violate?

    and I'm banned for life over there :(
  • O-Trap
    DeyDurkie5;1336261 wrote:What rule does "go fuck yourself" violate?
    It was deemed to be a personal attack, but you already know this, as you specifically were told that. Did you forget when you went on the "Go fuck yourself" meltdown?

    Had nothing to do with the use of the word "fuck."
    DeyDurkie5;1336261 wrote:and I'm banned for life over there :(
    I'm noticing a trend ...
  • DeyDurkie5
    O-Trap;1336262 wrote:It was deemed to be a personal attack, but you already know this, as you specifically were told that. Did you forget when you went on the "Go fuck yourself" meltdown?

    Had nothing to do with the use of the word "fuck."



    I'm noticing a trend ...
    Calling someone a butthole is a personal attack. Calling someone a bandwagon fan is a personal attack. All these things I've put in this thread have personal attacks on there. Telling someone to go fuck themselves is the same as gochiefs calling out skank for being retarded.
  • O-Trap
    DeyDurkie5;1336266 wrote:Calling someone a butthole is a personal attack. Calling someone a bandwagon fan is a personal attack. All these things I've put in this thread have personal attacks on there. Telling someone to go fuck themselves is the same as gochiefs calling out skank for being retarded.
    All those could, indeed, be seen as personal attacks, perhaps, but they could also not be. Describing someone (ie calling them a name) isn't necessarily an attack. It may be up for discussion, but that hasn't happened yet. "Go fuck yourself" was a specific example of something that had, beyond any doubt, been asserted as a personal attack. You continued to use it in meltdown mode when you knew it was a sure thing, and you're now trying to defend it by using examples of things that only MIGHT be alongside.

    Even if they are, your posts here aren't pointing those kinds of actions out. They're pointing out "being mean" and "using the fuck word." Why would you point out things that aren't rule issues?
  • GoChiefs
    Because the owner of the website repeatedly told you to stop, at which one time you were banned and I believe told him you wouldn't do it anymore, then continued to yet do it again?
  • said_aouita
    Adsense or not?


  • vball10set
    said_aouita;1337588 wrote:Adsense or not?


    you're wierd, dude
  • DeyDurkie5
    http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?37074-College-Basketball-Random-Chatter-2012-2013-Season&p=1336745&viewfull=1#post1336745

    Got another one for ya boys. Webby with a clear personal attack.
  • vball10set
    Cut and dry, Durk, good find :thumbup:
  • DeyDurkie5
    http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?38089-Concepts-theories-ideas-whatevers-that-mess-with-your-mind...&p=1338525&viewfull=1#post1338525

    CCrunner deserved it, because he's probably the dumbest human alive. But still a clear cut violation of the personal attack policy in place.
  • DeyDurkie5
    http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?22397-Beer-snob-discussion-thread&p=1338377&viewfull=1#post1338377

    Clear thread shit and topic derail by one of the biggest stool pushers on this site.
  • WebFire
    Man, what took so long? I kept waiting for a ban thread. But mod fail, I guess.
  • vball10set
    My wife tells me Pamprin works the best, Webbie :D
  • vball10set
    WebFire;1338608 wrote:Man, what took so long? I kept waiting for a ban thread. But mod fail, I guess.