Ohio Chatter DEV

fish82

gibby08 wrote:
superman wrote:
gibby08 wrote:
Mr. 300 wrote: A cardboard box could beat Obama/Biden. His paper imagery is now on full display, but it's only a 2 page paper, and not a novel. The right will have no problem winning the election.
Fox News
Margin of error: ±3%
Sample size: 900 January 12–13, 2010

Barack Obama 47% Mitt Romney 35%
Barack Obama 55% Sarah Palin 31%
Barack Obama 53% Newt Gingrich 29%
Got a link?
Here ya go my friend

http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/012110_poll.pdf

Oh....President Obama would beat a Tea Party Candidate 48% to 23%

Oh....for those of you that say President Obama's approval rating's are in the crapper:

PPP
Approve 52%
Dissapprove 44%

Gallup
Approve 51%
Dissapprove 41%

Fox News
Approve 48.1%
Disapprove 46.4%

Rasmussen(not a suprise considering they have started to show a much more Republican bias the past few months)
Approve 48%
Disapprove 51%

Zogby
Approve 50%
Disapprove 49%

His average approval is 48%
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_obama_job_approval-1044.html

No one is saying they're in the crapper. They have fallen 25 points in a year however, which is the fastest in recent history. If you don't think that's significant, then I don't know what to tell ya.

fish82

gibby08 wrote:
Mr. 300 wrote: A cardboard box could beat Obama/Biden. His paper imagery is now on full display, but it's only a 2 page paper, and not a novel. The right will have no problem winning the election.
Fox News
Margin of error: ±3%
Sample size: 900 January 12–13, 2010

Barack Obama 47% Mitt Romney 35%
Barack Obama 55% Sarah Palin 31%
Barack Obama 53% Newt Gingrich 29%

As of today, he leads a generic GOP candidate by 2 points...44-42. Independents would vote for a generic Pub by 14 points.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/125777/Voters-Divided-Obama-Republican-Candidate-2012.aspx

Common sense dictates that if Bam doesn't get the independents back, the Pubs could run a circus chimp in 2012 and get to 270.

BCBulldog

gibby08 wrote: I believe there is a difference between being ignorant towards something and not knowing something

I didn't know he was dead....sue me

As to the post that started this arguement.....I was not mocking Mr.Snow because he was dead(like many of you were with Rep.Murtha),I was simply stating that from what I've read and heard....I think he was below average as WHPS

Believe what you like, facts are facts, ignorance = not knowing something. Ignorant isn't stupid. However, now that you are no longer ignorant of the fact, you are acting in a manner that could possibly be characterized as stupid by definition.

wkfan

gibby08 wrote: As to the post that started this arguement.....I was not mocking Mr.Snow because he was dead(like many of you were with Rep.Murtha),I was simply stating that from what I've read and heard....I think he was below average as WHPS

Why not form your own opinion rather than rely on what others have written and what you have heard from others??

Mr. 300