Ohio Chatter DEV

justincredible

I don't have time to waste on dumb shit like this.

O-Trap

believer

Devils Advocate

QuakerOats;1510118 wrote:Catholics have done more Little kids in the butt than all others combined.

And my shit is getting real old.

Finally, common ground.

Reposted for thread integrity. Since my constitutional tights seen to have been abridged by the moderation staff.

Devils Advocate

justincredible;1510312 wrote:I don't have time to waste on dumb shit like this.

It's your monster Dr Frankenstien. Deal with it.

Devils Advocate

justincredible;1510312 wrote:I don't have time to waste on dumb shit like this.

It's your monster Dr Frankenstien. Deal with it.

ernest_t_bass

O-Trap;1510389 wrote:

What exactly would you call this tactic? Does it have a name? Not just yelling racist, but saying asinine shit in general. I HATE arguing with people who do this, b/c they think they "win" an argument, only by saying the most asinine shit, to which it's pointless to offer rebuttal.

Devils Advocate

ernest_t_bass;1510473 wrote:What exactly would you call this tactic? Does it have a name? Not just yelling racist, but saying asinine shit in general. I HATE arguing with people who do this, b/c they think they "win" an argument, only by saying the most asinine shit, to which it's pointless to offer rebuttal.

Yes. Exactly like Quacker posts. And when somebody suggests another opinion on the subject, you scream yell and bitch that the offending post be deleted.

QuakerOats

You did not suggest another opinion, you attempted to attribute another opinion to someone else by falsifying a post they made. There is no 'constitutional right' to impugning others by altering their written words; in fact it is illegal to do so. Hence, post # 1040 must come down also.

You can make all the vile posts you want (apparently), but you can't attribute them to others.

Heretic

QuakerOats;1510283 wrote:you have a pm.

And you have a sandy vagina.

justincredible

QuakerOats;1510520 wrote:You did not suggest another opinion, you attempted to attribute another opinion to someone else by falsifying a post they made. There is no 'constitutional right' to impugning others by altering their written words; in fact it is illegal to do so. Hence, post # 1040 must come down also.

You can make all the vile posts you want (apparently), but you can't attribute them to others.

He did not change or alter your written words. Your original post is unaltered. But, again, I don't have time for stupid shit like this.

justincredible

Btw, I am not liable for what other people post on the site so your threats sent to O-Trap (not me, for some reason) are absurd.

Under 47 U.S.C. sec. 230(c)(1): "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider." This provision has been uniformly interpreted by the Courts to provide complete protection against defamation or libel claims made against an ISP, message board or chat room where the statements are made by third parties.

queencitybuckeye

QuakerOats;1510520 wrote:You did not suggest another opinion, you attempted to attribute another opinion to someone else by falsifying a post they made. There is no 'constitutional right' to impugning others by altering their written words; in fact it is illegal to do so. Hence, post # 1040 must come down also.

You can make all the vile posts you want (apparently), but you can't attribute them to others.

You don't "own" the words you post here, Justin does. Not that he wants them unless he collects stupid.

Devils Advocate

justincredible;1510564 wrote:Btw, I am not liable for what other people post on the site so your threats sent to O-Trap (not me, for some reason) are absurd.

Uh Ohhhhh... Here come the Certified letter.

ernest_t_bass

Is quaker really that stoopid?

TedSheckler

These are all fascinating memes.

justincredible

TedSheckler;1510659 wrote:These are all fascinating memes.

This one, especially.

O-Trap

ernest_t_bass;1510473 wrote:What exactly would you call this tactic? Does it have a name? Not just yelling racist, but saying asinine shit in general. I HATE arguing with people who do this, b/c they think they "win" an argument, only by saying the most asinine shit, to which it's pointless to offer rebuttal.

At first glance, it appears to be ad hominem. By labeling someone a racist, you're attacking the claimant, but not the logical accuracy and consistency of the claim.

QuakerOats;1510520 wrote:You did not suggest another opinion, you attempted to attribute another opinion to someone else by falsifying a post they made. There is no 'constitutional right' to impugning others by altering their written words; in fact it is illegal to do so. Hence, post # 1040 must come down also.

You can make all the vile posts you want (apparently), but you can't attribute them to others.

Actually, I consulted an attorney over this specific example. Because there is no documented expectation of legal accuracy, this is as prosecutable as lying to your wife about what your mother said about her. Written-versus-oral statements are the only real distinction.

justincredible;1510564 wrote:Btw, I am not liable for what other people post on the site so your threats sent to O-Trap (not me, for some reason) are absurd.

You don't need to expend time on this. QO is throwing a hissy fit and trying to write checks he can't cash. You don't owe him a response. If he wants to try to pursue legal matters, let him figure it out on his own dime.