Archive

Romney opening up lead, 49 - 45

  • gut
    TedSheckler;1293034 wrote:New poll. Obama only has 47% of the Jewish vote. Compared to 78% last time.
    And we all know which 47% of the vote he has:laugh: Unemployed bankers, no doubt.
  • bases_loaded
    TedSheckler;1293034 wrote:New poll. Obama only has 47% of the Jewish vote. Compared to 78% last time.

    http://www.algemeiner.com/2012/10/11/new-poll-obama-attracts-only-47-of-likely-jewish-voters/

    How he has any percent is amazing to me.
  • Ty Webb
    Obama leads in Arizona:
    http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/10/13/latest_swing_state_polls.html
  • believer
    The Rocky Mountain Poll as reported by the leftist blog Political Wire? You're reaching bro. :rolleyes:
  • Ty Webb
    believer;1294033 wrote:The Rocky Mountain Poll as reported by the leftist blog Political Wire? You're reaching bro. :rolleyes:

    Kinda like polls showing Romney tied or within 1 or 2 in PA or Michigan?
  • BGFalcons82
    C'mon man...show us a Texas poll where Barry is leading.

    AZ...really???
    Oh yeah...Mitt is only down 7 in Cali.
  • Ty Webb
    BGFalcons82;1294319 wrote:C'mon man...show us a Texas poll where Barry is leading.

    AZ...really???
    Oh yeah...Mitt is only down 7 in Cali.
    Even as a joke you can't believe that

    President Obama up 51-46 in Ohio
    http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_OH_1013.pdf
  • superman
    Romney up 67-33 in Ohio.
    www.peopleinmylivingroom.com
  • QuakerOats
    TedSheckler;1293034 wrote:New poll. Obama only has 47% of the Jewish vote. Compared to 78% last time.

    http://www.algemeiner.com/2012/10/11/new-poll-obama-attracts-only-47-of-likely-jewish-voters/

    And that is just IT; he has lost signficant votes from EVERY demographic (except possibly illegals) and thus there is really no mathematical way he can win. He will lose votes from Jews, Catholics, young voters, and especially independants (which is a huge block). It is a failed presidency, and most people know it.
  • BGFalcons82
    [video=youtube;CqHPZteJ7rI][/video]
  • gut
    QuakerOats;1295956 wrote:And that is just IT; he has lost signficant votes from EVERY demographic (except possibly illegals) and thus there is really no mathematical way he can win. He will lose votes from Jews, Catholics, young voters, and especially independants (which is a huge block). It is a failed presidency, and most people know it.
    Here's the other thing. Romney appears to be leading nationally. Can a Republican really even come close to winning the popular vote and not win the electoral? Yeah, a Dem can do it because they take 67% in CA and NY, but c'mon....that smells.
  • Classyposter58
    I think it's unfortunate because Obama probably could've been a solid president 10 years from now. But he beat a much more qualified Hilary Clinton which should of never happened and now we're seeing the repercussions of that. I mean he's just showing he was pushed in way too soon and wasn't ready to lead, much similar to JFK, and our country is suffering because of that. Romney IMO is just a better pure leader regardless of political views and honestly sounds like a much stronger person. Obama showed in that debate he isn't at the level of Romney and sad thing is he's the man who's been there 4 years
  • BoatShoes
    Democrats are complaining about polls etc. the way Republicans were a few weeks ago which is not a good sign for Barry. Without a strong performance from BHO tomorrow I really think his debate performance was bad enough for this thing to swing to Romney. He had >70% chance of winning according to Nate Silver prior to that debate but people really were looking for a reason to send him packing and he gave them that reason in a big way.
  • gut
    Classyposter58;1296125 wrote:I think it's unfortunate because Obama probably could've been a solid president 10 years from now.
    Maybe. He almost certainly would have gotten better at negotiation/compromise and reaching across the aisle. I doubt his understanding of economics would ever have remotely approached a competent level - he did teach at U of C how many years and apparently didn't pick-up squat.

    The problem with liberals is that while it's good to have those ideas push us to better ourselves, they have no practical understanding or concern for the path to get there. They are so convinced of the merit and greatness of their vision that they have no concern for the short-run or transition, or even bother to ask themselves if their vision is pure fantasy. I mean, communism sounds great in theory - in a world of unlimited resources and no corruption - but in reality we know it's an abject failure and far from what liberals would have envisioned.