Archive

I'd like to play a game ...

  • O-Trap
    Ever read the children's magazine Highlights? There's always a section in there with a "Spot the difference" game.

    Let's play!

    [video=youtube;YuhHoWvl2mI]http://www.YouTube.com/watch?v=YuhHoWvl2mI[/video]
  • ernest_t_bass
    10:28? No thanks.
  • O-Trap
    Sorry. With video documentation, there are too many similarities to record in just a couple minutes.
  • justincredible
    Obamney.
  • O-Trap
    "Don't waste your vote! Vote Obamney 2012!"
  • justincredible
    That was fucking depressing to watch. They are the same guy.
  • cruiser_96
    No audio for me, so... No difference!?

    Another alternative is one was for "a" state doing it and the other, "the" state doing it. But, to me, it's still the same thing.

    Anywho, broken people trying to convince other broken people that they know how to fix people. Keep on keeping on.
  • THE4RINGZ
    I thought this thread was going to have a Saw theme to it.
  • Belly35
    Vote suggestion : Who would you let park your car? :D
  • pmoney25
    Glad I wonr be voting for either of those buffoons.
  • O-Trap
    THE4RINGZ;1184695 wrote:I thought this thread was going to have a Saw theme to it.

    I considered that.
    Belly35;1184750 wrote:Vote suggestion : Who would you let park your car? :D
    You, Belly. :D
  • isadore
    Obama continues to support those stands with Romney who knows.
  • FatHobbit
    isadore;1184786 wrote:Obama continues to support those stands with Romney who knows.
  • FatHobbit
    isadore;1184786 wrote:Obama continues to support those stands with Romney who knows.
    knows who Romney with stands those support to continues Obama.

    It makes as much sense backwards as it does forwards.
  • Heretic
    FatHobbit;1184795 wrote:knows who Romney with stands those support to continues Obama.

    It makes as much sense backwards as it does forwards.
    But if you mix the words up...

    those who knows stands Obama with Romney to continues support.


    PERFECT LOGIC SENSE TALK FOR US READ TIME HERE!
  • isadore
    gosh a ruddies, whatever.
    romney has taken stands on both sides of many major issues.
  • O-Trap
    isadore;1184868 wrote:gosh a ruddies, whatever.
    romney has taken stands on both sides of many major issues.
    If we compare what Obama campaigned on versus much of what he's done, you could make a case that he has as well.

    Another similarity! It's like a dam Easter egg hunt!
  • isadore
    O-Trap;1184881 wrote:If we compare what Obama campaigned on versus much of what he's done, you could make a case that he has as well.

    Another similarity! It's like a dam Easter egg hunt!
    With Obama he is not able to do all he campaigned on because of a Republican House and the Senate Republicans using the filibuster. What is ironic about Romney is he is running against his own accomplishment as governor.
  • FatHobbit
    isadore;1184886 wrote:With Obama he is not able to do all he campaigned on because of a Republican House and the Senate Republicans using the filibuster. What is ironic about Romney is he is running against his own accomplishment as governor.
    So when Democrats don't do anything it's the republican's fault. And when the republicans don't do anything, it'e the republican's fault? Got it. thanks...
  • O-Trap
    isadore;1184886 wrote:With Obama he is not able to do all he campaigned on because of a Republican House and the Senate Republicans using the filibuster. What is ironic about Romney is he is running against his own accomplishment as governor.
    Problem is, Obama doesn't need Congressional approval for some of what he promised, and his cavalier use of executive order thus far only further diminishes his submission to the checks-qnd-balances process by which he is subject to the other branches.

    Also, he did have both House majorities for the first two years.

    I do share the amusement at Romney's campaigning against ... well ... the very things he did that he feels "qualify" him as a leader in the public sector.
  • isadore
    O-Trap;1184900 wrote:Problem is, Obama doesn't need Congressional approval for some of what he promised, and his cavalier use of executive order thus far only further diminishes his submission to the checks-qnd-balances process by which he is subject to the other branches.

    Also, he did have both House majorities for the first two years.

    I do share the amusement at Romney's campaigning against ... well ... the very things he did that he feels "qualify" him as a leader in the public sector.
    He is our elected chief executive and has that right. I know many were enraged when he ordered the end of the don't ask, don't tell policy, as their forebearers were enraged 60 plus years ago when Truman ended segregation in the armed services. tough.
  • isadore
    FatHobbit;1184895 wrote:So when Democrats don't do anything it's the republican's fault. And when the republicans don't do anything, it'e the republican's fault? Got it. thanks...
    well since all republicans want to do is cut taxes for the rich and end regulations protecting average Americans, they are happy when the government is doing nothing else but reducing itself. So when republicans are not doing anything, they are ecstatic.
  • FatHobbit
    isadore;1184929 wrote:they are happy when the government is doing nothing else but reducing itself
    I don't think this ever happens.
  • FatHobbit
    isadore;1184926 wrote:He is our elected chief executive and has that right. I know many were enraged when he ordered the end of the don't ask, don't tell policy, as their forebearers were enraged 60 plus years ago when Truman ended segregation in the armed services. tough.
    I guess, if you love the terrorists you might think like that.
  • isadore
    FatHobbit;1184930 wrote:I don't think this ever happens.
    if you would like a history lesson, sure it has happened. jefferson, jackson, harding and coolidge all reduced are a few examples of presidencies when the number of government activiites decreased.