kizer permanente
Senior Member
1,309
posts
Joined
Aug 2017
kizer permanente
Senior Member
Tue, Nov 9, 2021 12:16 PM
We do. You have basic metrics that are set to pay out 100% of a bonus. How the company does based on those metrics determine if the Bonus is paid out more than 100% or less than 100%. Then each individuals have their own goals and metrics they have to meet to determine if they get 100% of what the company is paying out or more or less. Bonus percentages are based off of position in the company. Highest positions will be 30 % of salary, next level is 25, then 20, then 15... so on and so forth,
So company did really well and exceeded metrics by 30% and will pay out 130%. Employee A did well and met their goals and their position is 10% bonus of salary.. so they now get 10% of 130% of their salary. Employee B did ok and met most goals but not all, so they get 90% of the 130% of their salary. Assuming they were also at 10% bonus rate.
So say both make $100k a year... Employee A got a $13k bonus and employee B got $11,700.
kizer permanente
Senior Member
1,309
posts
Joined
Aug 2017
kizer permanente
Senior Member
Tue, Nov 9, 2021 12:32 PM
posted by gut
What Kizer said seems like a pretty good system, though that appears to be a hybrid performance/profit share.
A singular number/goal isn't good. And sales people often bitch when they lose money because production didn't hit the targeted operating margin.
Is a graduated or absolute pro rata like Kizer mentioned better than a simple two tier plan? Don't know, you'd have to research and think about it. But I would say the simplest "effective" plan is 1 number on revenues and 1 number on margin, and maybe a kicker on both for reaching the higher goal.
The performance review process can hash out the issues of whether you didn't meet your goal was your doing or beyond your control like production not hitting their target. You can be graded as you met your goal by your superior.
kizer permanente
Senior Member
1,309
posts
Joined
Aug 2017
kizer permanente
Senior Member
Wed, Nov 10, 2021 6:20 AM
posted by brutus161
We are not planning on implementing a performance-based aspect of the share. We currently have a performance bonus program in place. Currently, only site-level managers get a performance bonus. For this reason, they would receive a smaller portion of the profit share. This splitting of the share will be the difficult part. I currently work for a corporation that is a holding company for three smaller LLCs. Each LLC has its own sites and directors, but certain positions (HR, Safety, Controller, etc) handle the function for all 4 companies. This will cause me to create a profit-share plan that awards certain employees bonuses off total profits, and some for only one LLC. I've got a shit ton of work ahead of me. Good thing I don't have some bullshit vaccine mandate created by the Fed to take up any of my already precious time.
Oh. Sounds like Communism.
kizer permanente
Senior Member
1,309
posts
Joined
Aug 2017
kizer permanente
Senior Member
Wed, Nov 10, 2021 9:00 AM
posted by brutus161
Did you miss the second fucking sentence? This program will be in addition to the performance bonus program. I like how you call a business owner wanting to share his/her profits with those that are major players in the game Communism.
lol settle down. It was a joke. You need some weed or something.
kizer permanente
Senior Member
1,309
posts
Joined
Aug 2017
kizer permanente
Senior Member
Wed, Nov 10, 2021 9:08 AM
In all seriousness though.... you mention only site level managers are in the performance based program. It would behoove the company to make all associates have some skin in the game for profit sharing. Not all are going to put the same effort and shouldn't all be compensated the same. Just my opinion.