So after the first one I had serious doubts about the guilt or innocence of Steven Avery.  Now I am definitely leaning towards a frame job.  As far as Brendan Dassey goes, that confession should absolutely be thrown out as an example to law enforcement of what not to do whether the person is guilty or not. 

I'm only a little ways into Part 2 - but I am a firm believer that "most of the time" law enforcement gets it right.  I believe this documentary is highly one sided with the evidence it presents.  It would be interesting if someone did a documentary from the other side.

It's great entertainment and raises a lot of questions, but in order for the show to be entertaining - there has to be some manifested drama created.

posted by SnotBubbles

I'm only a little ways into Part 2 - but I am a firm believer that "most of the time" law enforcement gets it right.  I believe this documentary is highly one sided with the evidence it presents.  It would be interesting if someone did a documentary from the other side.

It's great entertainment and raises a lot of questions, but in order for the show to be entertaining - there has to be some manifested drama created.

I can agree that it is one sided.  I have tried to read as much info as is out there that the documentary doesnt include, such as the fact he called her that day etc...his new lawyer is very detailed and i feel will someday get to the bottom of it guilty or innocent