like_that
1st Team All-PWN
29,228
posts
Joined
Apr 2010
like_that
1st Team All-PWN
Wed, Jan 30, 2019 6:09 PM
SportsAndLady
Senior Member
39,070
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
SportsAndLady
Senior Member
Wed, Jan 30, 2019 6:14 PM
"No woman seeks a third trimester abortion except in the case of tragic or difficult circumstances, such as a nonviable pregnancy or in the event of severe fetal abnormalities, and the governor’s comments were limited to the actions physicians would take in the event that a woman in those circumstances went into labor," Ofirah Yheskel, a spokeswoman for Northam, said. "Attempts to extrapolate these comments otherwise is in bad faith and underscores exactly why the governor believes physicians and women, not legislators, should make these difficult and deeply personal medical decisions,"
Just to add the edit from that article..
like_that
1st Team All-PWN
29,228
posts
Joined
Apr 2010
like_that
1st Team All-PWN
Wed, Jan 30, 2019 6:29 PM
posted by SportsAndLady
Just to add the edit from that article..
This is their spin? I don't buy that bullshit. His comments were in reference/support of a VA state delegate proposing a bill as well as confirming that the bill allows an abortion up to minutes before birth. That bill itself is despicable. Especially considering most doctors agree it is safer for the women to deliver the child than abort it. You have to deliver the child regardless, so killing it really doesn't make much medical sense.
SportsAndLady
Senior Member
39,070
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
SportsAndLady
Senior Member
Wed, Jan 30, 2019 6:32 PM
posted by like_that
This is their spin? I don't buy that bullshit. His comments were in reference/support of a VA state delegate proposing a bill as well as confirming that the bill allows an abortion up to minutes before birth. That bill itself is despicable. Especially considering most doctors agree it is safer for the women to deliver the child than abort it. You have to deliver the child regardless, so killing it really doesn't make much medical sense.
Seems pretty obvious to me that they do not want perfectly healthy babies being born and then killed. But what do I know
like_that
1st Team All-PWN
29,228
posts
Joined
Apr 2010
like_that
1st Team All-PWN
Wed, Jan 30, 2019 6:36 PM
posted by SportsAndLady
Seems pretty obvious to me that they do not want perfectly healthy babies being born and then killed. But what do I know
Might as well kill off RBG with this logic.
iclfan2
Reppin' the 330/216/843
9,465
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
iclfan2
Reppin' the 330/216/843
Wed, Jan 30, 2019 7:31 PM
posted by like_that
Might as well kill off RBG with this logic.
Are we sure she’s actually still alive (j/k CC).
The bill mentioned from Virginia which failed already, also didn’t care about the health of the baby and would have allowed it based on the mothers possible “mental health”.
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/virginia-abortion-bill-barbaric/
SportsAndLady
Senior Member
39,070
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
SportsAndLady
Senior Member
Wed, Jan 30, 2019 7:53 PM
posted by gut
I have a suspicion that the underlying agenda here is to provoke outrage from Conservatives....for the purpose of campaigning that, if you re-elect Trump, abortion is going to become illegal.
Multiple states don't just one day wake-up and all start moving similar legislation through.
I agree. This smells political. And QO and others are falling right into it.
bigorangebuck22
Senior Member
322
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
bigorangebuck22
Senior Member
Thu, Jan 31, 2019 12:54 AM
posted by gut
I have a suspicion that the underlying agenda here is to provoke outrage from Conservatives....for the purpose of campaigning that, if you re-elect Trump, abortion is going to become illegal.
Multiple states don't just one day wake-up and all start moving similar legislation through.
ALEC says hello
like_that
1st Team All-PWN
29,228
posts
Joined
Apr 2010
like_that
1st Team All-PWN
Thu, Jan 31, 2019 7:36 AM
posted by gut
I have a suspicion that the underlying agenda here is to provoke outrage from Conservatives....for the purpose of campaigning that, if you re-elect Trump, abortion is going to become illegal.
Multiple states don't just one day wake-up and all start moving similar legislation through.
That's modern day politics. Everything that is done has an underlying agenda to rile up the other side. I think the left is biting off more than they can chew with this one though. This isn't a grey area "a fetus isn't a human!" debate. Even most normal pro choice people aren't bullish on late term abortions.
posted by SportsAndLady
I agree. This smells political. And QO and others are falling right into it.
It could be, but a late term abortion bill did pass in NY, so it's a little more than just political when a law is officially in place.
iclfan2
Reppin' the 330/216/843
9,465
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
iclfan2
Reppin' the 330/216/843
Thu, Jan 31, 2019 8:35 AM
posted by SportsAndLady
I agree. This smells political. And QO and others are falling right into it.
It could be, but a late term abortion bill did pass in NY, so it's a little more than just political when a law is officially in place.
The link I posted earlier showed a May 2018 Gallup poll where only 18% of democrats thought 3rd trimester abortions should be legal. So it doesn't seem smart to turn off some of the last remaining moderates.
Essentially, the democrats just have to not be fucking crazy and Trump loses in 2020. But already starting in on banishing private insurance, up-to-birth abortions, and hating successful people doesn't seem like a great way to do it.
CenterBHSFan
333 - I'm only half evil
7,259
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
CenterBHSFan
333 - I'm only half evil
Thu, Jan 31, 2019 9:06 AM
posted by iclfan2
Essentially, the democrats just have to not be fucking crazy and Trump loses in 2020.
This.
The question is if they are able to pull themselves together enough to do it. From the looks of things, no. The answer is no.
Dr Winston O'Boogie
Senior Member
3,345
posts
Joined
Oct 2010
Dr Winston O'Boogie
Senior Member
Thu, Jan 31, 2019 11:32 AM
posted by QuakerOats
For the love of God there are tens of thousands of wonderful adults who wish to be parents that would love to adopt a newborn. How could anyone take the life of a baby knowing there are so many ready to adopt that child? Where the hell is the humanity?
Here's one where I agree with you entirely. I can't understand a human being even talking about how this "procedure" works without feeling sick to their stomach. If a woman is into here third trimester and doesn't wan the baby, the most loving thing she can do is provide it to willing parents. Even if the baby has some sort of developmental disability, there are tens of thousands of couples who would happily adopt him/her. I have no comprehension as to how anyone can support this, let alone cheer about it.
If someone who agrees with aborting a viable baby can please explain to me what is the difference between that and, for example, euthanizing a severely retarded teenager because the child is causing mental health issues on the mother? What's the difference?
like_that
1st Team All-PWN
29,228
posts
Joined
Apr 2010
like_that
1st Team All-PWN
Thu, Jan 31, 2019 1:19 PM
posted by Dr Winston O'Boogie
Here's one where I agree with you entirely. I can't understand a human being even talking about how this "procedure" works without feeling sick to their stomach. If a woman is into here third trimester and doesn't wan the baby, the most loving thing she can do is provide it to willing parents. Even if the baby has some sort of developmental disability, there are tens of thousands of couples who would happily adopt him/her. I have no comprehension as to how anyone can support this, let alone cheer about it.
If someone who agrees with aborting a viable baby can please explain to me what is the difference between that and, for example, euthanizing a severely retarded teenager because the child is causing mental health issues on the mother? What's the difference?
Or an elder adult that obviously isn't in good health. This is why I facetiously said we might as well kill off RBG. I don't understand the logic and why it's celebrated.
Dr Winston O'Boogie
Senior Member
3,345
posts
Joined
Oct 2010
Dr Winston O'Boogie
Senior Member
Thu, Jan 31, 2019 3:07 PM
iclfan2
Reppin' the 330/216/843
9,465
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
iclfan2
Reppin' the 330/216/843
Thu, Jan 31, 2019 3:11 PM
posted by Dr Winston O'Boogie
This reminds me of the baker in Colorado who refused to sell the gay couple a cake.
Except that they could have bought anything from the bakery. They couldn't get a CUSTOM cake. So no, not really the same thing. I'm cool with a company refusing to serve someone for any reason though, so I'm fine with the MAGA hat ban. The market will decide if he stays in business or not.
like_that
1st Team All-PWN
29,228
posts
Joined
Apr 2010
like_that
1st Team All-PWN
Thu, Jan 31, 2019 3:13 PM
posted by iclfan2
Except that they could have bought anything from the bakery. They couldn't get a CUSTOM cake. So no, not really the same thing. I'm cool with a company refusing to serve someone for any reason though, so I'm fine with the MAGA hat ban. The market will decide if he stays in business or not.
Me too.
O-Trap
Chief Shenanigans Officer
18,909
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
O-Trap
Chief Shenanigans Officer
Thu, Jan 31, 2019 3:21 PM
posted by QuakerOats
San Fran restaurant bans MAGA hats...
Fun times
1. It's the free market at work. If it hurts their business, it's on them.
2. It's San Francisco. I'd just assumed MAGA hats were pretty taboo around town already.
posted by iclfan2
Except that they could have bought anything from the bakery. They couldn't get a CUSTOM cake. So no, not really the same thing. I'm cool with a company refusing to serve someone for any reason though, so I'm fine with the MAGA hat ban. The market will decide if he stays in business or not.
posted by like_that
Me too.
Same, obviously.