Progressives, part 3...

Home Forums Politics

Heretic

Son of the Sun

Tue, Jan 15, 2019 6:23 PM
posted by QuakerOats

If only it were that.

 

True, if you're an overly triggered l'il bitch, you can read all sorts of shit into things!

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

Tue, Jan 15, 2019 6:32 PM

I had to share this comment I found from the ad.  It brought the lulz:

"I hear Tampax is coming out with a similar ad  The message is 'ladies, let's not be cunts.' It's a very positive message."  

Dr Winston O'Boogie

Senior Member

Wed, Jan 16, 2019 9:58 AM

Gillette has attempted a Pearl Harbor style attack.  Like Japan being cut off from natural resources in the pre WW2 days, Gillette has been blocked by the Hipster Beard.  As Hipsters have fallen in love and formed commitments with the Hipster Beard, their reliance on razors has gone the way of the dodo.  The scales have been lifted from their eyes.  Gillette and their blades look like a former drug supplier to a recovering addict - sad and pathetic.  What Gillette has clearly missed is that the Hipster's bond with his beard is stronger than any corporate entity.  It's stronger than hate, stronger than war, stronger than poverty, stronger than injustice.  The Hipster-beard bond is unyielding, uncompromising, principled and proud.  It is deeper than marriage's "'til death do us part."  Gillette has awakened the sleeping tiger.  God help P&G if the Hipster and his beard seek revenge for a blatant attempt to take from the Hipster that which he holds so dear.  

Dr Winston O'Boogie

Senior Member

Wed, Jan 16, 2019 10:06 AM

O-Trap

Chief Shenanigans Officer

Wed, Jan 16, 2019 10:14 AM
posted by Dr Winston O'Boogie

Gillette has attempted a Pearl Harbor style attack.  Like Japan being cut off from natural resources in the pre WW2 days, Gillette has been blocked by the Hipster Beard.  As Hipsters have fallen in love and formed commitments with the Hipster Beard, their reliance on razors has gone the way of the dodo.  The scales have been lifted from their eyes.  Gillette and their blades look like a former drug supplier to a recovering addict - sad and pathetic.  What Gillette has clearly missed is that the Hipster's bond with his beard is stronger than any corporate entity.  It's stronger than hate, stronger than war, stronger than poverty, stronger than injustice.  The Hipster-beard bond is unyielding, uncompromising, principled and proud.  It is deeper than marriage's "'til death do us part."  Gillette has awoken the sleeping tiger.  God help P&G if the Hipster and his beard seek revenge for a blatant attempt to take from the Hipster that which he holds so dear.  

I lol'd.

Also, is it "awoken" or "awakened?"  Or does either work?

Dr Winston O'Boogie

Senior Member

Wed, Jan 16, 2019 11:18 AM
posted by O-Trap

I lol'd.

Also, is it "awoken" or "awakened?"  Or does either work?

Awakened it should be - you are correct.  Hipster Beard is honored by your commitment to accuracy.  

O-Trap

Chief Shenanigans Officer

Wed, Jan 16, 2019 12:14 PM
posted by Dr Winston O'Boogie

Awakened it should be - you are correct.  Hipster Beard is honored by your commitment to accuracy.  

Well hell, I am flattered by Hipster Beard.

Heretic

Son of the Sun

Wed, Jan 16, 2019 12:27 PM

Are you sure it isn't "awoken"? After all, that word has "woke" inside it and if there's anything Hipster Beards take pride in, it's being woke.

Automatik

Senior Member

Wed, Jan 16, 2019 1:32 PM

I just saw the Gillette commercial for the first time. Well done.

 

QuakerOats

Senior Member

Wed, Jan 16, 2019 3:46 PM

Ocasio-Cortez joining Maxine Waters on House financial services committee.

 

 

 

What could possibly go wrong.

 

CenterBHSFan

333 - I'm only half evil

Wed, Jan 16, 2019 4:05 PM

I like how AOC said "be prepared to be exhausted as we run train on progressive agenda" in an interview for WaPo. Every time she opens her mouth I can only think that she's the female version of Trump.

 

O-Trap

Chief Shenanigans Officer

Wed, Jan 16, 2019 5:29 PM
posted by CenterBHSFan

I like how AOC said "be prepared to be exhausted as we run train on progressive agenda" in an interview for WaPo. Every time she opens her mouth I can only think that she's the female version of Trump.

If she actually said "run train," I can see why.  Good lord.  That's about as bad as "grab 'em by the pussy."

Heretic

Son of the Sun

Wed, Jan 16, 2019 5:32 PM
posted by CenterBHSFan

I like how AOC said "be prepared to be exhausted as we run train on progressive agenda" in an interview for WaPo. Every time she opens her mouth I can only think that she's the female version of Trump.

 

Well, judging by how a couple of this site's conservatives react to virtually everything she says, she's already off to a good start in gaining her own "AOC Derangement Syndrome" fan club!

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

Wed, Jan 16, 2019 5:45 PM
posted by Heretic

Well, judging by how a couple of this site's conservatives react to virtually everything she says, she's already off to a good start in gaining her own "AOC Derangement Syndrome" fan club!

Yeah, they really do fall for her trap every time. They give her too much attention, just like leftists/liberals and the media give Trump too much attention (especially during the election).  They have fallen for her shit so much, that a fake controversy was created that apparently all conservatives where offended by her dance video. 

She is a moron.  Just let her implode by herself, because it will eventually happen. 

Heretic

Son of the Sun

Wed, Jan 16, 2019 6:12 PM
posted by like_that

Yeah, they really do fall for her trap every time. They give her too much attention, just like leftists/liberals and the media give Trump too much attention (especially during the election).  They have fallen for her shit so much, that a fake controversy was created that apparently all conservatives where offended by her dance video. 

She is a moron.  Just let her implode by herself, because it will eventually happen. 

Right now, to my amusement at least, both sides have fallen so far in the "manufacture faux-outrage over everything" rabbit hole that every single thing that happens or is said gets turned into pure fucking comedy.

Take the Clemson football visit. Got mocked a lot by the left because the presidential meal for the team was fast food and pizza and because Trump apparently misspelled hamburgers in a tweet.

Proper response: How about, "Lol, if you little bitches are reaching that far to bash Trump, you're a bunch of fucking nuts who never should be taken seriously on any matter of actual importance ever again."

Instead, some dipshit memester (who knows, maybe the same person who thought ACO's dancing was something worth mocking) manufactured a hilariously false quote attributed to Trevor Lawrence where "he" started by saying it was all of their favorite foods and then segued into how the "coastal elite media" was being pissy because they weren't eating organic vegan food and how they're football players, not bloggers. And I can only stand in awe at how one dedicated person turned something completely stupid into something even more stupid.

O-Trap

Chief Shenanigans Officer

Wed, Jan 16, 2019 9:11 PM
posted by CenterBHSFan

https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/transcript-ocasio-cortez-says-the-conservative-right-is-losing-the-war/2019/01/15/31ddb0b6-1912-11e9-8813-cb9dec761e73_story.html?utm_term=.a960d392a403

"The Republican Party is now the party of Trump. That is who they are. No one rebukes him."

Erm ... what?

In my lifetime, I don't think I've seen a Republican presidential candidate and president who has drawn so much criticism from his own party base.  Not even Bush, with his "read my lips" shenanigans or Bush, Jr. with his ridiculous wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.  And this is magnified by the fact that we appear to be more polarized now than we were during the Bush administration.

Hell, we have a subset of Republicans referred to as "Never Trump."  I don't recall a subset referred to as "Never Bush" or "Never Reagan."  Then again, I was pretty young during Reagan.  Maybe I recall incorrectly.

ptown_trojans_1

Moderator

Thu, Jan 17, 2019 7:46 AM
posted by O-Trap

"The Republican Party is now the party of Trump. That is who they are. No one rebukes him."

Erm ... what?

In my lifetime, I don't think I've seen a Republican presidential candidate and president who has drawn so much criticism from his own party base.  Not even Bush, with his "read my lips" shenanigans or Bush, Jr. with his ridiculous wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.  And this is magnified by the fact that we appear to be more polarized now than we were during the Bush administration.

Hell, we have a subset of Republicans referred to as "Never Trump."  I don't recall a subset referred to as "Never Bush" or "Never Reagan."  Then again, I was pretty young during Reagan.  Maybe I recall incorrectly.

I'll push back on this a tad. 

Trump still has a near 90% approval rating among Republicans. Sure there are a few Rs that buck him, for the most part, they either ignore his stupidity or just throw up their hands and say, "meh at least he is not a D."

The never Trumpers have kind of faded from the limelight over the last year. I'd say more Rs are more like Lindsay Graham, initially not Trump and now, all Trump, or tacit approval of Trump. 

https://news.gallup.com/poll/203198/presidential-approval-ratings-donald-trump.aspx  

CenterBHSFan

333 - I'm only half evil

Thu, Jan 17, 2019 7:50 AM

Had somebody post this to me on Twitter (removing names, of course):

 

More

 Regarding your last RT. NOBODY who works deserves 65 milion dollars. Unless you are a world hero who single handedly ended all war, you deserve to be paid for your work at a normal level.

 

More

Seriously, if all the ridiculous wages go down to a more feasible level, and that money is used on real issues like infrastructure, research and overal wage raises for everyone. We would live in a utopia instead of going to a dystopia like we do now.

I've been friends with this person for the better part of a decade, we used to work together. In my responses to him, I tried to keep in mind that he's from Europe (Belgium) and has a different idea of what is "fair" than most people in the US do. But it's amazing to me that so many people think it's "ok" to target paychecks based on feelings, at the core of the issue, of resentment.  

iclfan2

Reppin' the 330/216/843

Thu, Jan 17, 2019 8:12 AM
posted by CenterBHSFan

Had somebody post this to me on Twitter (removing names, of course):

I've been friends with this person for the better part of a decade, we used to work together. In my responses to him, I tried to keep in mind that he's from Europe (Belgium) and has a different idea of what is "fair" than most people in the US do. But it's amazing to me that so many people think it's "ok" to target paychecks based on feelings, at the core of the issue, of resentment.  

No one bats an eye at athlete or hollywood pay, but them big bad CEO's making money and keeping people employed...

CenterBHSFan

333 - I'm only half evil

Thu, Jan 17, 2019 8:29 AM

I just had to put a stop to the discussion (as much as can be had on Twitter) when he posted this: 


It should be objective, not subjective. But if you decide your own wage, how is this different? Cutting wages on resentment is bad. Gaining wages by your own will is unfair.

 

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

Thu, Jan 17, 2019 8:33 AM
posted by CenterBHSFan

Had somebody post this to me on Twitter (removing names, of course):

I've been friends with this person for the better part of a decade, we used to work together. In my responses to him, I tried to keep in mind that he's from Europe (Belgium) and has a different idea of what is "fair" than most people in the US do. But it's amazing to me that so many people think it's "ok" to target paychecks based on feelings, at the core of the issue, of resentment.  

I have never had a leftist/liberal legitimately define what "fair" is.  Next time someone brings it up, ask them to define it, because he/she most likely won't provide you any metrics at all and give you the typical emotional song & dance.   

This is especially true when it comes to taxes and they cry about paying your "fair share."  Somehow a flat tax where the Government is stealing an equal % of your paycheck across the board is not fair, but they also can't define what would be fair for their own worth.  

CenterBHSFan

333 - I'm only half evil

Thu, Jan 17, 2019 8:47 AM
posted by like_that

I have never had a leftist/liberal legitimately define what "fair" is.  Next time someone brings it up, ask them to define it, because he/she most likely won't provide you any metrics at all and give you the typical emotional song & dance.   

This is especially true when it comes to taxes and they cry about paying your "fair share."  Somehow a flat tax where the Government is stealing an equal % of your paycheck across the board is not fair, but they also can't define what would be fair for their own worth.  

I actually tried to get them to explain this to me, in a roundabout way. I rep'd your post and dropped a link to the discussion. We are the only two involved at the moment so it branches off at different tweets, you'll have to click a few times to see the rest of the discussion. Who is who in this discussion is obvious.

O-Trap

Chief Shenanigans Officer

Thu, Jan 17, 2019 9:42 AM
posted by CenterBHSFan

I just had to put a stop to the discussion (as much as can be had on Twitter) when he posted this: 

Oh, man.  I would have zeroed in on that and made him explain it.

"How is it unfair to gain a wage by your own will?"