posted by geeblock

People with kids get 10 s of thousands of dollars in tax credits  each year for two decades. For what? Because they had a kid? How is this fair to those of us who don’t have kids? It’s not that diff

Your numbers are far off, but didn’t know you cared so much about rich white people getting their debt reduced.

posted by iclfan2

Your numbers are far off, but didn’t know you cared so much about rich white people getting their debt reduced.

Rich white people don’t have debt and if you have several kids my numbers are right on 

posted by geeblock

Rich white people don’t have debt and if you have several kids my numbers are right on 

K. It definitely hasn’t been proven that most people with student debt are well off. At the very least more than the people who didn’t go to college at all. But what’s $300B between friends? Throw personal responsibility out the door. 

Also probably not even legal, per Nanci Pelosi.

posted by iclfan2

K. It definitely hasn’t been proven that most people with student debt are well off. At the very least more than the people who didn’t go to college at all. But what’s $300B between friends? Throw personal responsibility out the door. 

Also probably not even legal, per Nanci Pelosi.

Dude your the one that brought up anything about wiping out rich white people debt. I didn’t mention race or wealth. What I did say is that it’s weird to focus on this write off and be outraged while taking another very similar write off. I simply asked why should I pay more taxes because you have a kid? And you took it off the rails. If you can’t afford a kid don’t have one by your logic 

posted by geeblock

Dude your the one that brought up anything about wiping out rich white people debt. I didn’t mention race or wealth. What I did say is that it’s weird to focus on this write off and be outraged while taking another very similar write off. I simply asked why should I pay more taxes because you have a kid? And you took it off the rails. If you can’t afford a kid don’t have one by your logic 

No one has a kid for a slight tax write off. They aren’t comparable or at all similar. And yea, don’t have a kid if you can’t afford one. 

posted by iclfan2

No one has a kid for a slight tax write off. They aren’t comparable or at all similar. And yea, don’t have a kid if you can’t afford one. 

But you take it nonetheless. People also don’t go to college for loan forg

posted by iclfan2

No one has a kid for a slight tax write off. They aren’t comparable or at all similar. And yea, don’t have a kid if you can’t afford one. 

Living in a rural area, I can say that some trailer trash types do. Normals don't, but anyone looking to squeeze every drop out of the system gets creative!

posted by geeblock

Rich white people don’t have debt and if you have several kids my numbers are right on 

You would need 4+ kids to get “10s of 1000s of dollars each year”

posted by Automatik

Unfortunately… 62k also not what it once was. 

True; it's $55k in the last year alone.

Shocking, but not shocking, that some people are ok with forcing certain people to pay the debts of other people in order to reward the irresponsibility and/ignorance of the other people.  When you reduce it down, it is nothing more than Marxism.  With the regime now in charge, that is where we are on the slope. 

FJB

posted by iclfan2

Lol I wasn’t saying you. And would absolutely not. Thanks. I would support any party lowering interest rates or even back tracking on cumulative interest. But a handout, nah. Also, colleges need penalized. 100+ worthless employees at each one

They already did that.  Obama lowered the cap on payments as a % of disposable income (you know, what responsible people should have left over AFTER food, rent and utilities) to a max of 10% from 15%, and then it was lowered again to 5%.  And then the loan was forgiven after 25 years (lowered to 20 I think).  I believe this new bill might lower it to 10 years.  Not sure if everyone can qualify for forgiveness, but I think so.

In other words, already pretty damn close to free as someone making $100k would have their payments capped at like $3k per year.

1. The White House gives the following example of how monthly payments would shrink under the proposed changes: A typical single public school teacher with an undergraduate degree, making $44,000 a year, would pay only $56 a month on their loans, compared to the $197 they pay now under the most recent income-driven repayment plan. This would add up to an annual savings of nearly $1,700

posted by geeblock

People with kids get 10 s of thousands of dollars in tax credits  each year for two decades. For what? Because they had a kid? How is this fair to those of us who don’t have kids? It’s not that diff

Reducing your taxes is VERY different from an actual handout.  I don't consider it a handout if you lower the money you confiscate from me from say $1000 to $500.

Also, our entire economic system is geared toward growth.  It's an incentive, or rather it's designed to reduce the cost of having kids.

A college degree, on the other hand, produces a positive ROI even despite the rising costs.  You shouldn't need my money to invest in yourself.

posted by jmog

You would need 4+ kids to get “10s of 1000s of dollars each year”

I dont know what it is this year but wasnt it like 3600 per kid during covid?

im also enjoying watching people rail about this on twitter then go to the comments and someone has a screenshot of their forgiven PPP loan of over 500k

The hypocisy is......IMMEASURABLE.

PPP was known to be forgivable up front. PPP was an answer to fix something the government fucked up. PPP was passed by Congress. But otherwise totes the same. 

posted by iclfan2

PPP was known to be forgivable up front. PPP was an answer to fix something the government fucked up. PPP was passed by Congress. But otherwise totes the same. 

Exactly.  Laughable how people just regurgitate talking points without any independent thought.

PPP loans were designed to offset expenses incurred by a FORCED govt shutdown.  Most of the PPP loans were used to support payroll so people wouldn't be laid off while they were unable to go to work because of said forced shutdown.  And a much smaller portion was allowed to go to fixed business expenses.

No one made any profit on PPP loans, except maybe the banks got a little for processing the paperwork.

posted by gut

Exactly.  Laughable how people just regurgitate talking points without any independent thought.

PPP loans were designed to offset expenses incurred by a FORCED govt shutdown.  Most of the PPP loans were used to support payroll so people wouldn't be laid off while they were unable to go to work because of said forced shutdown.  And a much smaller portion was allowed to go to fixed business expenses.

No one made any profit on PPP loans, except maybe the banks got a little for processing the paperwork.

very little went to workers from what i saw...even if that is a bad example..people dont seem to mind trump filing bankruptcy 6 times and will wear his flag all around town but get pissed because the little guy gets a crumb.  billionaires skirt tax laws and pay very little tax and you cheer as if somehow that is a win for you, but lose it when the common man which most on here are gets a break. its still very stupid to be against working people getting a break.

posted by geeblock

im also enjoying watching people rail about this on twitter then go to the comments and someone has a screenshot of their forgiven PPP loan of over 500k

Not remotely close to being the same; not even in the same universe. 

posted by geeblock

I dont know what it is this year but wasnt it like 3600 per kid during covid?

Well you said 10s of 1000s. Since 10s is plural thar is >$20,000/year or a minimum of 6 or 7 kids.

Hope you weren’t serious   

posted by iclfan2

PPP was known to be forgivable up front. PPP was an answer to fix something the government fucked up. PPP was passed by Congress. But otherwise totes the same. 

PPP was essentially returning taxes to the entities that had paid the taxes to begin with, after the government shut down many of their businesses.  

This is not even remotely close to forcing certain people to pay for other peoples' contractual debt obligations.  

To even begin to try to entangle the two is an indication of sheer ignorance combined with Marxist tendencies.

posted by jmog

Well you said 10s of 1000s. Since 10s is plural thar is >$20,000/year or a minimum of 6 or 7 kids.

Hope you weren’t serious   

i meant in the 10 thousand or above per year for 18-20  years

posted by QuakerOats

PPP was essentially returning taxes to the entities that had paid the taxes to begin with, after the government shut down many of their businesses.  

This is not even remotely close to forcing certain people to pay for other peoples' contractual debt obligations.  

To even begin to try to entangle the two is an indication of sheer ignorance combined with Marxist tendencies.

we just gave a 2 trillion dollar cut to the rich and 80 billion to the ukraine..im quite sure we can spare it

posted by geeblock

we just gave a 2 trillion dollar cut to the rich and 80 billion to the ukraine..im quite sure we can spare it

WTF are you talking about 

posted by QuakerOats

WTF are you talking about 

tax cuts and jobs act?  last week we sent another 80 billion to the ukraine?