O-Trap
Chief Shenanigans Officer
18,909
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
O-Trap
Chief Shenanigans Officer
Thu, Jul 25, 2019 2:32 PM
posted by gut
Well, there's unknown option C) that he already mostly beat federal charges. I wouldn't bet he gets convicted. I could see the charges mysteriously being dropped, or dismissed by a judge. If all you have is one new witness (no idea), that's probably not enough for a jury even if she's a good witness.
I'm not sure ratting on powerful people will help him - because you're assuming NY or the feds want to charge those people (Trump, sure, but not anyone else). But if he has the goods, those powerful people are already putting the fix in on his behalf (like, I assume, they did before).
The C option is possible, sure.
As for the state or fed wanting to charge them, they'd still theoretically get crucified in the public, and it might open them up to an increased need for security, as I'm betting there would be vigilante nutballs trying to take matters into their own hands.
I'm sure that anyone relevant would be trying to help his case, but if there's any reasonable possibility that you get outed, how long do you let it go before trying to just keep him quiet?
O-Trap
Chief Shenanigans Officer
18,909
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
O-Trap
Chief Shenanigans Officer
Thu, Jul 25, 2019 3:24 PM
posted by gut
The problem with the conspiracy theory is he was already convicted and served time. And the "silence him" crowd just sits on their thumbs waiting for the other shoe to drop?
Pedo's are the lowest of the low in jail. I'm sure there are plenty of inmates who'd be happy to murder a rich pedo. And they would do it for free, without any prodding.
Sure. Another reason why it's perfectly plausible ... I'd even say probable ... that this could have been just himself trying to end it.
CenterBHSFan
333 - I'm only half evil
7,259
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
CenterBHSFan
333 - I'm only half evil
Thu, Jul 25, 2019 3:35 PM
I think I've asked this before: But isn't this double jeapordy or does it apply in this instance?
O-Trap
Chief Shenanigans Officer
18,909
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
O-Trap
Chief Shenanigans Officer
Thu, Jul 25, 2019 4:58 PM
posted by gut
So Tulsi Gabbard is suing Google for $50M because her ad account was blocked/deactivated after the debate when she was getting a surge in traffic.
Legit, or elaborate scheme to skirt campaign finance laws and have Google give her campaign tens of millions of dollars via "settlement"?
There's a very real possibility that she could make a case for her losses to be in the millions as a result of having the account shut down.
Not sure what she would accuse Google of doing, though. It's their business and their ad platform.
CenterBHSFan
333 - I'm only half evil
7,259
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
CenterBHSFan
333 - I'm only half evil
Thu, Jul 25, 2019 6:19 PM
Well, Google has been under scrutiny for suppressing free information (iirc), stifling competing companies, and teaming up with other tech valley companies to banish certain people. It's not just your average competition when you team up with other industries such as other social media like youtube and even the banking industry. There's some pretty shady stuff going on once you dig beneath the surface.
With all of this going on I can easily believe that they stifled a political figure. It's probably going to happen again if they get away with picking political winners and losers the first time. Very scary thought when you think about what they've been up to. I'm going to guess that's the reason why the amount Gabbard is suing for is so large - not to mention it shines a very big light on things.
O-Trap
Chief Shenanigans Officer
18,909
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
O-Trap
Chief Shenanigans Officer
Thu, Jul 25, 2019 7:41 PM
posted by gut
$50M? Even $1M over a few hours, possibly a day? $6M for these campaigns at this stage is a big haul over a MONTH. I would guess her damages are more realistically in the low six-figures.
Which is why I threw it into the conspiracy thread. $50M? Would that money go to Gabbard, or her campaign? In either event, you see the problem. If Google settles for just a few million, it should perhaps be investigated as a campaign finance violation.
That would be a neat trick. Have Elon Musk say something defamatory about Kamala. She sues him for slander, and then he can write a big fat settlement check.
I'm not saying I believe her, but with a high enough ad-spend, it's absolutely possible to get there with PPC in a day.
I don't know what normal ranges are for AdWords campaigns used in politics, but it's not impossible.
Dr Winston O'Boogie
Senior Member
3,345
posts
Joined
Oct 2010
Dr Winston O'Boogie
Senior Member
Wed, Mar 18, 2020 12:14 PM
Alex Jones was served with papers from multiple attorneys general telling him to cease and desist with selling his crap that promises to kill coronavirus. Like televangelist Jim Bakker, there is a special place in hell for him.
ptown_trojans_1
Moderator
8,788
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
ptown_trojans_1
Moderator
Mon, Jul 20, 2020 12:13 PM
ptown_trojans_1
Moderator
8,788
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
ptown_trojans_1
Moderator
Mon, Jul 20, 2020 12:21 PM
justincredible
Honorable Admin
37,969
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
justincredible
Honorable Admin
Mon, Jul 20, 2020 1:07 PM
How many degrees of separation are they from Kevin Bacon, though?
SportsAndLady
Senior Member
39,070
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
SportsAndLady
Senior Member
Mon, Jul 20, 2020 1:19 PM
Anyone read the Wayfair conspiracies? Pretty gd creepy
justincredible
Honorable Admin
37,969
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
justincredible
Honorable Admin
Mon, Jul 20, 2020 1:30 PM
posted by SportsAndLady
Anyone read the Wayfair conspiracies? Pretty gd creepy
I fell down that rabbit hole for a while. And then the dude got arrested for trafficking and he was wearing a Wayfair shirt in his mugshot.
justincredible
Honorable Admin
37,969
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
justincredible
Honorable Admin
Mon, Jul 20, 2020 2:06 PM
CenterBHSFan
333 - I'm only half evil
7,259
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
CenterBHSFan
333 - I'm only half evil
Turns out that some of the conspiracy theories floated around the internet are actually true!
Whodathunk?
justincredible
Honorable Admin
37,969
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
justincredible
Honorable Admin
Everyone on the Epstein island list is a national security threat and should be treated as such. I am 100% serious.