Can anyone beat Massillon?

• Al Bundy

  As we approach the end of the regular, Massillon clearly looks like the team to beat in D1. We have outscored our opponents by 34 points a game over the last month. Can anyone compete with us? GO TIGERS!!
• Red Rider Nation

  Are you kidding me with this? Um of course people can beat Massillon. You arent even the best team in Stark County! Glenoak beat you so yes they can and so can McKinley and maybe Hoover. And if you do get out of this region you have NO shot against Ed's, Iggy, St X! Stop starting such silly threads!
• beverboy1

  you only played d2 d3 schools !!!!!!!!! really !! you are getting ahead of yourself a little :laugh:
• Al Bundy

  Red Rider Nation;1299454 wrote:Are you kidding me with this? Um of course people can beat Massillon. You arent even the best team in Stark County! Glenoak beat you so yes they can and so can McKinley and maybe Hoover. And if you do get out of this region you have NO shot against Ed's, Iggy, St X! Stop starting such silly threads!

  Glenoak beat us very early in the season. They would have no shot now. We have kids from all over the country, so it does take a little time to build team chemistry. We have more computer points than Ed's, Iggy, and X.
• GoChiefs

  

  For the record, Bundy isn't a Massillon fan.
• DeadliestWarrior34

  

  GoChiefs;1299554 wrote:For the record, Bundy isn't a Massillon fan.

  
  He's a pretty entertaining troll though
• GoChiefs

  

  DeadliestWarrior34;1299555 wrote:He's a pretty entertaining troll though

  
  Correct. But he's trolling because of a poster that hasn't made a post since August 15th. Makes no sense.
• Al Bundy

  GoChiefs;1299565 wrote:Correct. But he's trolling because of a poster that hasn't made a post since August 15th. Makes no sense.

  I have no idea what you are talking about. I am just excited for the playoffs because this will be the year that my Tigers finally win a real championship. I have been predicting a state title for us because we have the best resources in the state. These resources have allowed us to bring in a QB from Oregon, OL from Ravenna, and kids from 6 different states for our combine.
• ThePatriot

  Hoping that Massillon gets their first tournament championship. Long shot, but hey. Im pulling for 'em.
• McKAlumni07

  

  Not gonna happen ... No championship to Massillon.... I'm obviously pulling for the bulldogs Saturday ... And whoever plays the tigers week 11....go Mckinley Beat Massillon
• Red Rider Nation

  McKAlumni07;1301401 wrote:Not gonna happen ... No championship to Massillon.... I'm obviously pulling for the bulldogs Saturday ... And whoever plays the tigers week 11....go Mckinley Beat Massillon

  
  Geez they get some flat black helmets over there and all the sudden they are the Oregon Ducks??? Absolutely no championship this year in Massillon or any year on the future for that matter.
• GoChiefs

  

  Red Rider Nation;1302460 wrote:Geez they get some flat black helmets over there and all the sudden they are the Oregon Ducks???

  
  Huh?
• goosebumps

  

  How does Kyle Kempt look at QB? He the real deal? I know some people are excited to have him at UC next fall.
• Old Rider

  

  goosebumps;1302474 wrote:How does Kyle Kempt look at QB? He the real deal? I know some people are excited to have him at UC next fall.

  I watched them play Austintown Fitch and I was impressed with his arm, his ability to see the field, and he seemed to read the defense well. I thought his only downside was when he got pressured...did not appear to be a strong runner and at times held on to the ball too long and other times just chucked it in the air.
• Al Bundy

  McKAlumni07;1301401 wrote:Not gonna happen ... No championship to Massillon.... I'm obviously pulling for the bulldogs Saturday ... And whoever plays the tigers week 11....go Mckinley Beat Massillon

  We have dominated the series, and that will continue on Saturday.
• McKAlumni07

  

  Al Bundy;1302720 wrote:We have dominated the series, and that will continue on Saturday.

  This post proves you are no tigers fan... And shows your ignorance since the bulldogs have won 3 of the last four and kept the bell in 3 of the last 3...and this year will make 4... Kept has been good at times and at others 3-5 ints and that won't be good for his team
• Al Bundy

  McKAlumni07;1303215 wrote:This post proves you are no tigers fan... And shows your ignorance since the bulldogs have won 3 of the last four and kept the bell in 3 of the last 3...and this year will make 4... Kept has been good at times and at others 3-5 ints and that won't be good for his team

  This series goes back a lot more than 4 games. A real McKinley fan would know that. I stand by my statement that we have historically dominated this series.
• McKAlumni07

  

  Who cares who "dominates" the series that doesn't dictate the game this year...and standing by your statement doesn't make it less ignorant or more relevant...
• Al Bundy

  McKAlumni07;1303615 wrote:Who cares who "dominates" the series that doesn't dictate the game this year...and standing by your statement doesn't make it less ignorant or more relevant...

  Merriam Webster defines ignorant as destitute of knowledge or education. By your lack of knowledge of how we have dominated McKinley in this series (the series didn't start 4 years ago), you seem to fit this definition quite well. After looking at McKinley's state report card, the destitute of education part also applies.
• McKAlumni07

  

  Al Bundy;1304099 wrote:Merriam Webster defines ignorant as destitute of knowledge or education. By your lack of knowledge of how we have dominated McKinley in this series (the series didn't start 4 years ago), you seem to fit this definition quite well. After looking at McKinley's state report card, the destitute of education part also applies.

  What's the series total in wins then? I can tell you Massillon does lead the series. And in a 121 game series(122 is Saturday) leading by 12 isn't exactly dominating. But I know math probably isn't your strong suit.
• Al Bundy

  McKAlumni07;1304138 wrote:What's the series total in wins then? I can tell you Massillon does lead the series. And in a 121 game series(122 is Saturday) leading by 12 isn't exactly dominating. But I know math probably isn't your strong suit.

  The series total is 64-52-5 in favor of the Tigers. I would expect a real McKinley fan to know the series record, but I am happy to help you out with that. McKinley would have to win 12 in a row just to even up the series. We have a commanding lead in the series.
• McKAlumni07

  

  Al Bundy;1304146 wrote:The series total is 64-52-5 in favor of the Tigers. I would expect a real McKinley fan to know the series record, but I am happy to help you out with that. McKinley would have to win 12 in a row just to even up the series. We have a commanding lead in the series.

  
  12 isn't a commanding lead... And since you obviously can't read I knew the series record I put that we were down 12.... I'm done wasting my time with someone troll that probably isn't even a Massillon fan... We need skank and coyote back in here so someone who actually knows what they are talking about can have a real conversation about "The Game".. Go back under your rock...
• Al Bundy

  McKAlumni07;1304328 wrote:12 isn't a commanding lead... And since you obviously can't read I knew the series record I put that we were down 12.... I'm done wasting my time with someone troll that probably isn't even a Massillon fan... We need skank and coyote back in here so someone who actually knows what they are talking about can have a real conversation about "The Game".. Go back under your rock...

  You knew the series so well that you asked me in post #20 "What's the series total in wins then?" 12 games over .500 is a huge lead in a football series. You would have to win every game until the current 1st graders in Massillon (or about the current 5th graders at McKinley) graduate just to tie the series.
• Pick6

  

  lol Bundy is trolling like a boss in this thread.
• Sonofanump

  Week 13 @Mansfield vs Whitmer.