Ohio Chatter DEV

skank

Capones a bandwagon jumper anyway, let him be.

hoops23

Capone, do you like the Pirates too?

Al Capone

skank wrote: Capones a bandwagon jumper anyway, let him be.

Yep. Been on the bandwagon since birth. skank should worry about another ass-whipping from Big Red.

Al Capone

LTrain23 wrote: Capone, do you like the Pirates too?

NO

skank

Al Capone wrote:
skank wrote: Capones a bandwagon jumper anyway, let him be.
Yep. Been on the bandwagon since birth. skank should worry about another ass-whipping from Big Red.

Let's see here, if "Big Red" won the next 33 games against Massillon, YES....I said 33, the series would be tied.

And as far as being a bandwagon jumper, I can spot em from miles away, and you my friend, are a bandwagon jumper.

Al Capone

Bring up facts and watch all the Brown fans scurry back into their little holes. hahaha

mtrulz

Cool story bro

BR1986FB

Al Capone wrote: Bring up facts and watch all the Brown fans scurry back into their little holes. hahaha

FACT: 8 > 6, DICK

killer_ewok

BR1986FB wrote:
Al Capone wrote: Bring up facts and watch all the Brown fans scurry back into their little holes. hahaha
FACT: 8 > 6, DICK

8??? Come on, man. You're better than that. Are you seriously counting 4 AAFC titles? It was an 8 team league and it is NOT recognized as the same as winning an NFL/AFL Championship. That's really reaching just to try and make your team look better. It's 6-4 in favor of Pittsburgh. How decent Cleveland fans can actually claim 4 AAFC titles as the equivalent of NFL/AFL titles is beyond me.

Also, I wouldn't refer to what you were talking about earlier as "selective memory." It's more like "living in the now."

ytownfootball

The fact is it took Pittsburgh 39 years in the league to win a play-off game. 1933-1972

You're not seriously trying to discount the blatant ineptitude of a franchise that lasted nearly a generation?

killer_ewok

ytownfootball wrote: The fact is it took Pittsburgh 39 years in the league to win a play-off game. 1933-1972

You're not seriously trying to discount the blatant ineptitude of a franchise that lasted nearly a generation?

Yes, they sucked......decades ago. It happened and nobody is ignoring that fact. The fact of the matter is though......the last 40 years have been GREAT. Should I ask some of you if you're trying to discount the overwhelming success of a franchise that has lasted approximately the same amount of time as their blatant ineptitude? Furthermore, I think we're still currently in Pittsburgh's successful run.

The funny thing is....if I was pulling the shit that some of you are pulling on here over on the college football board and throwing Notre Dame's old success and/or Ohio State's previous "struggles" in some of your faces.....I'd get laughed off the fuckin' thread. But now it must be "different."

ytownfootball

Yes, they sucked......decades ago. It happened and nobody is ignoring that fact.

You're the first to recognize it, and to your credit I'm not surprised.

if I was pulling the shit that some of you are pulling on here over on the college football board and throwing Notre Dame's old success

ND had success? GTFO!!!

killer_ewok

ytownfootball wrote:
Yes, they sucked......decades ago. It happened and nobody is ignoring that fact.
You're the first to recognize it, and to your credit I'm not surprised.

if I was pulling the shit that some of you are pulling on here over on the college football board and throwing Notre Dame's old success
ND had success? GTFO!!!

LOL. You're alright, man.

Fair enough.

Lovejoy1984

killer_ewok wrote:
ytownfootball wrote: The fact is it took Pittsburgh 39 years in the league to win a play-off game. 1933-1972

You're not seriously trying to discount the blatant ineptitude of a franchise that lasted nearly a generation?
Yes, they sucked......decades ago. It happened and nobody is ignoring that fact.

Wrong. Capone does.

killer_ewok

HighRoller74 wrote:
killer_ewok wrote:
ytownfootball wrote: The fact is it took Pittsburgh 39 years in the league to win a play-off game. 1933-1972

You're not seriously trying to discount the blatant ineptitude of a franchise that lasted nearly a generation?
Yes, they sucked......decades ago. It happened and nobody is ignoring that fact.
Wrong. Capone does.

You're right. I should've said that we're not all ignoring that fact. My bad.

DeyDurkie5

LJ wrote: This thread now sucks.

Good job.

Don't act like you haven't killed a thread with some retarded argument

BR1986FB

killer_ewok wrote:
BR1986FB wrote:
Al Capone wrote: Bring up facts and watch all the Brown fans scurry back into their little holes. hahaha
FACT: 8 > 6, DICK
8??? Come on, man. You're better than that. Are you seriously counting 4 AAFC titles? It was an 8 team league and it is NOT recognized as the same as winning an NFL/AFL Championship. That's really reaching just to try and make your team look better. It's 6-4 in favor of Pittsburgh. How decent Cleveland fans can actually claim 4 AAFC titles as the equivalent of NFL/AFL titles is beyond me.

Also, I wouldn't refer to what you were talking about earlier as "selective memory." It's more like "living in the now."

A championship is a championship. We could also discount Super Bowl titles that were won in 14 game seasons with shorter playoffs but I wouldn't do that.

Potato....potato....you say "living in the now" which I can buy because most Steeler "fans" (not yourself) know nothing about their history and have been "fans" :rolleyes: since 2005.

killer_ewok

We can agree to disagree. I don't think AAFC titles should be included in the argument as the NFL does not recognize their championships. I can honestly say if the shoe was on the other foot.....I would not include them as championships for the Steelers.

LJ

DeyDurkie5 wrote:
LJ wrote: This thread now sucks.

Good job.
Don't act like you haven't killed a thread with some retarded argument

Here and there, yes, but this is getting pretty constant and ridiculous.

BR1986FB

LJ wrote:
DeyDurkie5 wrote:
LJ wrote: This thread now sucks.

Good job.
Don't act like you haven't killed a thread with some retarded argument
Here and there, yes, but this is getting pretty constant and ridiculous.

But the pissing matches seem to come down to ONE poster. I don't get on Steelers threads to start shit, although I did start the Roethlisberger thread. Get rid of that poster, problem SOLVED.

Those who know me from JJ's tend to know me to be pretty level headed but if a jackass (not you, LJ) wants to step up and start stupidity I'll cut off their fucking nuts and verbally feed them to them. We ALL know WHO that instigator/poster is.

DeyDurkie5

LJ wrote:
DeyDurkie5 wrote:
LJ wrote: This thread now sucks.

Good job.
Don't act like you haven't killed a thread with some retarded argument
Here and there, yes, but this is getting pretty constant and ridiculous.

so what, it's an internet message board. These things will happen, I mean you can't say don't argue on this site!

killer_ewok

BR1986FB wrote:
LJ wrote:
DeyDurkie5 wrote:
LJ wrote: This thread now sucks.

Good job.
Don't act like you haven't killed a thread with some retarded argument
Here and there, yes, but this is getting pretty constant and ridiculous.
But the pissing matches seem to come down to ONE poster. I don't get on Steelers threads to start shit, although I did start the Roethlisberger thread. Get rid of that poster, problem SOLVED.

Those who know me from JJ's tend to know me to be pretty level headed but if a jackass (not you, LJ) wants to step up and start stupidity I'll cut off their fucking nuts and verbally feed them to them. We ALL know WHO that instigator/poster is.

Don't feel too bad........if you ever check out Steelers (or even Penguins threads) threads.....I think you'll find that there is another poster who is similar to Capone but is anti-Steelers and his name is Strapping Young Lad.

I don't like when anybody does it, whether they're a fan of my team or not.

BR is definitely a quality poster who is almost always reasonable and logical. Every now and again he stoops to someone's level (I do that too at times). Things can get a little frustrating and it happens to the best of us.

LJ

DeyDurkie5 wrote:
LJ wrote:
DeyDurkie5 wrote:
LJ wrote: This thread now sucks.

Good job.
Don't act like you haven't killed a thread with some retarded argument
Here and there, yes, but this is getting pretty constant and ridiculous.
so what, it's an internet message board. These things will happen, I mean you can't say don't argue on this site!

There is a difference between arguing and being a troll.

BR1986FB

Ewok is a quality poster too...even if he's a Yinzer fan.

Al Capone

So according to BR, people can get on here in rag Pittsburgh all the time. But when a Pittsburgh fan says anything to nullify their claims, they should be banned. Typical Browns fan, a whiny little bitch.

Archive

Jerry Glanville: "I traded Favre to sober him up"