Josh Cribbs seriously hurt on games final play

• ck9

  Josh Cribbs was seriously hurt on the final play of tonight's game.
  He was immobilize and taken off the field on a stretcher. He appeared to have movement in his arms.
  It was not shown on ESPN. I was listening to the game on the radio and when they game back on the air after the commercial break following the game Donnavan and Dieken were talking about it.
• Al Bundy

  ck9 wrote: Josh Cribbs was seriously hurt on the final play of tonight's game.
  He was immobilize and taken off the field on a stretcher. He appeared to have movement in his arms.
  It was not shown on ESPN. I was listening to the game on the radio and when they game back on the air after the commercial break following the game Donnavan and Dieken were talking about it.

  ESPN showed it on their postgame.
• gabuckeye

  And the Browns season just gets even worse...
• wildcats20

  

  A lot of people will say it was "part of the game." But it was a cheap shot. The play was 15 yards right of where Cribbs was.
• Al Capone

  It wasnt a cheap shot. It looked to me like the guy just ran into him. Thats what they get for running that play anyway when your down by 2 scores. Just kneel on the ball!
• Al Bundy

  wildcats20 wrote: A lot of people will say it was "part of the game." But it was a cheap shot. The play was 15 yards right of where Cribbs was.

  I'm a Browns fan, and I didn't see it as cheap. It was a solid hit.
• Glory Days

  

  it wasnt even a hard "bump". both players were maybe at half to 3/4 speed. he fell over onto his back and i dont even think hit his head. i was kinda confused on what happend. the only thing i saw was the raven's player put his hand up on cribbs chest, maybe even his neck area. not sure what that would do though.
• royal_k

  

  That was a cheap shot if I've ever seen one. There was no need to hit him in the first place. He was completely away from and out of the play. The player may have been a path to collide with him, but he didn't need to extend his arms and hit him with the force he did. Complete bull shit and he better be fined bigtime.
• royal_k

  

  I have it DVRd and have watched it sevsreal times. It was a bogus hit.
• Al Bundy

  royal_k wrote: That was a cheap shot if I've ever seen one. There was no need to hit him in the first place. He was completely away from and out of the play. The player may have been a path to collide with him, but he didn't need to extend his arms and hit him with the force he did. Complete bull shit and he better be fined bigtime.

  When you keep having laterals on a play, it is hard to say who is out of the play.
• les_diables_bleus

  The same thing could have been said for the Ravens and the way they approached the last play. The game was over, I dont care how many laterals there were and if the Browns scored or not. It was over and there is no sense in going kamikaze on a play that means nothing.
  
  I also got a hoot out of the comment that if the Ravens went to their throwback unis they would be wearing Browns uniforms. NOT TRUE! Modell gave all that up when he moved his franchise out of Cleveland. He left it behind, and if you go to the pro football HOF they list the Ravens franchise as beginning in 1996, but the Browns franchise going back to 1950 (in the NFL). Cleveland retained all the history, colors, name, and championship banners. Modelll took his roster and office staff period.
• NOL fan

  les_diables_bleus wrote: I also got a hoot out of the comment that if the Ravens went to their throwback unis they would be wearing Browns uniforms. NOT TRUE! Modell gave all that up when he moved his franchise out of Cleveland. He left it behind, and if you go to the pro football HOF they list the Ravens franchise as beginning in 1996, but the Browns franchise going back to 1950 (in the NFL). Cleveland retained all the history, colors, name, and championship banners. Modelll took his roster and office staff period.

  yep. if the Ravens wore throw backs they would pretty much have to go with these:
  
  
  
  it always bugs me when people say things like "the old Browns are really in Baltimore and so is their history"
  
  no...we cheer for the uniform and the uniform didn't go anywhere. The players were what left...and they are always coming and going anyway. The uniform remains. This was just a case where all the players happened to leave at once for 3 years.
  
  saying the current Browns can't claim the history of the pre 1996 Browns isn't much different than saying the current Packers can't claim their titles from the 60s.....in both cases the uniforms and franchise remain and the personnel is what is different
• Footwedge

  les_diables_bleus wrote: The same thing could have been said for the Ravens and the way they approached the last play. The game was over, I dont care how many laterals there were and if the Browns scored or not. It was over and there is no sense in going kamikaze on a play that means nothing.
  
  I also got a hoot out of the comment that if the Ravens went to their throwback unis they would be wearing Browns uniforms. NOT TRUE! Modell gave all that up when he moved his franchise out of Cleveland. He left it behind, and if you go to the pro football HOF they list the Ravens franchise as beginning in 1996, but the Browns franchise going back to 1950 (in the NFL). Cleveland retained all the history, colors, name, and championship banners. Modelll took his roster and office staff period.

  
  Baltimore should have kept the name Browns. The Browns legacy has been destroyed by this Lerner franchise.
  
  New franchise? Then choose a new name and move on.
  
  The whole cherade was a ruse pulled off by the NFL.
• hoops23

  

  What damn difference does it make whether or not we kept the Browns name and logo or if we didn't? NONE. Point blank, all the same shit would still be going on. Until Lerner brings in a legit football mind to operate this football team (hopefully sometime soon), we're doomed. Point blank.
  
  This team is trash. We actually have a serviceable defense, thanks to Rob Ryan and his schemes, but they are left out on the field more than ANY other defensive unit in the NFL thanks to the Browns putrid (and that's degrading to the word putrid) offense. I mean seriously? 8.6 ppg?
  
  TRASH.
• newarkcatholicfan

  

  I am no Browns fan but I do like Cribbs play and hate seeing any player get hurt.
• justincredible

  

  That was a bogus play to be running when you're down by 16 points. WTF was the point? Now your only playmaker is seriously injured.
• Hesston

  

  only playmaker we got, I wonder how bad it is?
• cat_lover

  He shouldn't have even been in the game. What were they going to do,score a 16 point touchdown? Just more proof that Mangini is a Weenie.
• thedynasty1998

  

  It was not a dirty hit in the slightest bit. Not sure how anyone can come up with that conclusion.
  
  I think Cribbs is just faking it. He doesn't want to play for this pisspoor team anymore and figured faking an injury could get him on the IR the rest of the year. Smart move by Cribbs.
• darbypitcher22

  

  hopefully Cribbs is ok. I didn't watch the 4th quarter; game was LONG over by then.
• royal_k

  

  thedynasty1998 wrote: It was not a dirty hit in the slightest bit. Not sure how anyone can come up with that conclusion.
  
  I think Cribbs is just faking it. He doesn't want to play for this pisspoor team anymore and figured faking an injury could get him on the IR the rest of the year. Smart move by Cribbs.

  1, You obviously weren't watching the same game I was.
  
  2. Joshua Cribbs plays every play 110% and saying he is faking an injury is one of the stupidist things I've seen on here. I f there is one player on this team that WOULDN'T do that. It is Cribbs.
• Hesston

  

  only the Browns would have their stud hurt on a play that never should have happened, it was a meaningless play, lateral? explain that, it makes the Hoodies call Sunday night look good
  
  Mangini is a joke (so is Lerner) only thing cool about the Browns is D coordinater Rob Ryan and if he doesnt back away from the buffet line they'll have to find a replacement there too
• NOL fan

  newarkcatholicfan wrote: I am no Browns fan but I do like Cribbs play and hate seeing any player get hurt.

  what's the deal with your avatar?
• SQ_Crazies

  

  LOL, no way Cribbs is faking it. It wasn't a dirty hit, maybe an unnecessary one, but not dirty at all. Cribbs just wasn't braced for it--he didn't see it coming at all. Hopefully it's not TOO serious and the stretcher was just precautionary.
• elbuckeye28

  I kept watching the replay of the play, and I don't feel that it was a dirty hit. It just appeared to be a freak play.