Super Bowl XLIV: Indianapolis Colts vs New Orleans Saints
-
Nonnever seen a play quite like that
he did get it over and was touched down already by the time he rolled over -
SocietyIt's GOOD!!!!
-
tk421Good! 24 - 17.
-
osu45804IT'S GOOD
-
wes_mantooth
not a Phil Simms fan, but he explained that exactly right.royal_k wrote: All it has to do is cross it at any time. -
tk421Time for a Manning end of 4th quarter drive.
-
NonI never heard this first act, second act
could be the Saints day -
osu99that's a UT Rocket right there!
-
Glory Daysbad call. i have seen receivers catch the ball in the endzone with both feet down and get blasted losing the ball and its called no catch. i believe it happend to the raiders this year.
-
Nonfirst OT Super Bowl maybe
-
royal_kGood to see a Toledo boy make a big play.
-
wes_mantooth
I think it is basically, he made a "football move" and then regrouped and re extended, but it had already crossed the goal line by then.Non wrote: I never heard this first act, second act
could be the Saints day -
Glory Days
thats on a running play, on a pass play you must maintain possession throughout the catch no matter where you are on the field.wes_mantooth wrote:
I think it is basically, he made a "football move" and then regrouped and re extended, but it had already crossed the goal line by then.Non wrote: I never heard this first act, second act
could be the Saints day -
Nononce he crosses the plane then everything else is over?
-
royal_k
Yeah, he was right. Arun and a pass are 2 different calls.wes_mantooth wrote:
not a Phil Simms fan, but he explained that exactly right.royal_k wrote: All it has to do is cross it at any time. -
tk421Manning with all day to throw.
-
wes_mantooth
Yeah, but it is dead once he established and crossed the goal line. He then reached out again and the ball was kicked out of his hands.Glory Days wrote:
thats on a running play, on a pass play you must maintain possession throughout the catch no matter where you are on the field.wes_mantooth wrote:
I think it is basically, he made a "football move" and then regrouped and re extended, but it had already crossed the goal line by then.Non wrote: I never heard this first act, second act
could be the Saints day -
NonI can't remember seeing a play like that.
Every other time the receiver was going to the ground and had to maintain it. Even in the end zone.
That was different since he reached over and made a slight move after the catch but still seems kind of unclear what the rules are. -
mhs95_06
A run and a pass are two different situations, but I think he did enough to establish possession before it was kicked out!royal_k wrote:
Yeah, he was right. Arun and a pass are 2 different calls.wes_mantooth wrote:
not a Phil Simms fan, but he explained that exactly right.royal_k wrote: All it has to do is cross it at any time. -
Glory Daysi am just saying, i have seen plays where the catch was made, both feet down in the endzone, player falls out of bounds and drops the ball, no catch.
-
wes_mantoothColts are going to score too quick, just like Arizona did last year.
-
NonManning driving it down pretty easy.
Saints won the challenge so three timeouts. Another factor. -
mallymal614This may sound dumb, but should the Colts take their time in scoring if they get close? Do they want to given Brees another shot at it or take their chances with coin toss in overtime?
-
Pick6Garcon is reppin' the Mount not only all game but all season. Malcolm Jenkins is having a solid game IMO.
-
Nongoing down to the wire