Archive

Chad Johnson

  • Al Capone
    If you think stinco would be the #1 receiver on the Steelers, you my friend are either on crack or dont know anything about football.
  • Al Capone
    Plus you're a Browns fan so I dont think we can have an intelligent conversation about football if you know what I mean.
  • DeyDurkie5
    Al Capone wrote: If you think stinco would be the #1 receiver on the Steelers, you my friend are either on crack or dont know anything about football.
    Since 2001....

    Ocho- 684 receptions 9952 yards receiving 62 td's

    Ward 771 receptions 8416 yards receiving 67 td's

    Almost even in production...SO like i said, ocho 1 with Ward a very close 2nd.

    If you think ocho wouldn't be a top 3 on the Steelers, you sir are a fucking moron
  • DeyDurkie5
    Al Capone wrote: Plus you're a Browns fan so I dont think we can have an intelligent conversation about football if you know what I mean.
    how does my team sucking have anything to do with my sports knowledge? lol are you 10 years old? or a steelers version of NCF?
  • Lovejoy1984
    As an impartial observer, Ochiocinco would be the #1 WR on the Steelers, and if Al Capone thinks different, it's clearly Bias.
  • DeyDurkie5
    HighRoller74 wrote: As an impartial observer, Ochiocinco would be the #1 WR on the Steelers, and if Al Capone thinks different, it's clearly Bias.
    thank you for the logic
  • Al Capone
    DeyDurkie5 wrote:
    Al Capone wrote: If you think stinco would be the #1 receiver on the Steelers, you my friend are either on crack or dont know anything about football.
    Since 2001....

    Ocho- 684 receptions 9952 yards receiving 62 td's

    Ward 771 receptions 8416 yards receiving 67 td's

    Almost even in production...SO like i said, ocho 1 with Ward a very close 2nd.

    If you think ocho wouldn't be a top 3 on the Steelers, you sir are a fucking moron
    Stinko= no playoff wins
    Ward= 2 Super bowl rings
    Who would you rather be? hahaha
  • DeyDurkie5
    Al Capone wrote:
    DeyDurkie5 wrote:
    Al Capone wrote: If you think stinco would be the #1 receiver on the Steelers, you my friend are either on crack or dont know anything about football.
    Since 2001....

    Ocho- 684 receptions 9952 yards receiving 62 td's

    Ward 771 receptions 8416 yards receiving 67 td's

    Almost even in production...SO like i said, ocho 1 with Ward a very close 2nd.

    If you think ocho wouldn't be a top 3 on the Steelers, you sir are a fucking moron
    Stinko= no playoff wins
    Ward= 2 Super bowl rings
    Who would you rather be? hahaha

    I am not arguing that you dense fuck, I am arguing that Ocho would be a number 1 receiver on the steelers, and I'm right..so lick my balls
  • Lovejoy1984
    Al,

    Why does everything come back to rings with you? Is that the only thing you have to fall back on. Rings are team awards, not individual accomplishments.

    Charlie Batch also has 2 SB rings, is he a better QB than Carson Palmer? Or Joe Flacco??

    I would've included DA or BQ, but Batch is better than those too :)
  • Terry_Tate
    T-7th in TDs amongst WRs
    18th in Yards amongst WRs
    17th in catches amongst WRs

    All on the team that was 27th in passing attempts. I'm not arguing for him to be top 10 or anything, but he's definitely better than the 25th WR in the NFL.
  • Al Capone
    I am just saying that Stinko would have trouble finding playing time with the Steelers. You are a ratard if you think he would be the #1.
  • I Wear Pants
    I love the Steelers and I know that Chad Johnson would be a starting receiver. He'd probably be two or maybe even three on the roster though.
  • Al Capone
    Terry_Tate wrote: T-7th in TDs amongst WRs
    18th in Yards amongst WRs
    17th in catches amongst WRs

    All on the team that was 27th in passing attempts. I'm not arguing for him to be top 10 or anything, but he's definitely better than the 25th WR in the NFL.
    #1 in running his mouth
    #1 in not backing it up
  • DeyDurkie5
    Al Capone wrote: I am just saying that Stinko would have trouble finding playing time with the Steelers. You are a ratard if you think he would be the #1.
    and you love steeler dick...i'm done with this argument, enjoy that ward cream sauce
  • Lovejoy1984
    Al Capone wrote: I am just saying that Stinko would have trouble finding playing time with the Steelers. You are a ratard if you think he would be the #1.
    Ochocinco would be at worst the #3 for the Steelers. But he could very easily be the #1, or #2. Ward, and Holmes are very good receivers, but it isn't like either one of them are on the same level as a T.O., Jerry Rice, or Randy Moss(All-Time Greats and 1st Ballot HOF). Same goes with Ochocinco, he is very good receiver, and if he was on the Steelers, he'd have no problem seeing the field, and to think otherwise is foolish.
  • Terry_Tate
    With all this arguing about the Steelers and Chad, I think the Steelers have good WRs for what they have and Chad is good for what the Bengals do. Chad can't block as well as Hines, but there's no debate he definitely runs better routes than anyone on the Steelers. Their WRs are good for just playing more or less background football as Big Ben is usually escaping the pocket and creating plays, whereas the Bengals and Carson really don't do that, he needs WRs that run crisp routes, which Chad does as good as anyone.
  • Al Capone
    DeyDurkie5 wrote:
    Al Capone wrote: I am just saying that Stinko would have trouble finding playing time with the Steelers. You are a ratard if you think he would be the #1.
    and you love steeler dick...i'm done with this argument, enjoy that ward cream sauce
    Ward = Hall of fame
    Stinko= I dont think so
  • DeyDurkie5
    Al Capone wrote:
    DeyDurkie5 wrote:
    Al Capone wrote: I am just saying that Stinko would have trouble finding playing time with the Steelers. You are a ratard if you think he would be the #1.
    and you love steeler dick...i'm done with this argument, enjoy that ward cream sauce
    Ward = Hall of fame
    Stinko= I dont think so
    lol I don't care if either make it, I'M A BROWNS FAN. I'm just trying to point out how biased you are
  • Al Capone
    Ask Keith Rivers what he thinks of Ward? Oh I forgot, He cant talk yet.:P
  • gut
    You guys are crazy. I'm a Steeler fan, and Ward would not beat out Ocho. Ward has the intangibles, but Ocho is just that much more of a threat receiving. I love Ward as a player and he's my all-time favorite Steeler, but the guy can't beat man coverage any more. He makes his living against zones.

    I also don't think Holmes has surpassed Ocho yet. But there's a legit debate there.
  • Rotinaj
    Al Capone wrote:
    DeyDurkie5 wrote:
    Al Capone wrote: I am just saying that Stinko would have trouble finding playing time with the Steelers. You are a ratard if you think he would be the #1.
    and you love steeler dick...i'm done with this argument, enjoy that ward cream sauce
    Ward = Hall of fame
    Stinko= I dont think so
    When both careers are over "stinko" will have better career numbers than Ward.
  • Skyhook79
    Rotinaj wrote:
    Al Capone wrote:
    DeyDurkie5 wrote:
    Al Capone wrote: I am just saying that Stinko would have trouble finding playing time with the Steelers. You are a ratard if you think he would be the #1.
    and you love steeler dick...i'm done with this argument, enjoy that ward cream sauce
    Ward = Hall of fame
    Stinko= I dont think so
    When both careers are over "stinko" will have better career numbers than Ward.
    Maybe so but he won't be a Hall of Famer and won't be the winner that Ward is and isn't that what its all about? Winning Rings and getting to the HOF?
    btw- I can't stand Hines anymore than I can Chad but at least Hines backs his trash talk up.