Since they both or unemployed who had the better career?
-
gerb131Chad or T.O.
-
like_thatEasily Owens.
-
Azubuike24Definitely Owens.
-
Ironman92Pretty lop-sided IMO
-
jmogNot even close when you look at their stats.
-
Commander of AwesomeNot even close.
-
RotinajI'm with everyone else. TO in a landslide.
-
Commander of AwesomeMight as well ask TO or TJ Whosyourmomma.
-
gerb131
I was desperate to start a thread lolCommander of Awesome;1255281 wrote:Might as well ask TO or TJ Whosyourmomma. -
Azubuike24It's not to take away from Chad's career, but Owens is one of the top 5 WR's of all-time.
You could argue that only Jerry Rice and Randy Moss are clearly superior. -
gerb131
Was going to say should I edit for Randy MossAzubuike24;1255285 wrote:It's not to take away from Chad's career, but Owens is one of the top 5 WR's of all-time.
You could argue that only Jerry Rice and Randy Moss are clearly superior. -
Azubuike24It's close, but Moss is the only WR I've ever seen where the game plan was focused on him. It's kind of like Calvin Johnson, but Moss did it for a decade.
-
Pick6Thread cant be serious.
T.O. vs Moss very debatable. -
said_aouita
Chad couldn't hold T.O.'s jock.like_that;1255275 wrote:Easily Owens.
I like that.Pick6;1255295 wrote: T.O. vs Moss very debatable.
When T.O. & Moss were at their peak, who was the most unstoppable? I go with Moss. -
Enforcersaid_aouita;1255308 wrote:
When T.O. & Moss were at their peak, who was the most unstoppable? I go with Moss.
Agreed -
like_thatI would have to take Moss over TO. Although, I can't help but imagine what TO and McNabb (in his prime) could have done together if TO wasn't such a bitch. That Eagles team was pretty damn good, and they were only going to get better with TO/McNabb in their primes with a full year of knowing each other under their belts.
-
se-alumYea, not close, Owens by alot.
-
IggyPride00
T.O wasn't the one who wilted in the bright lights of that Super Bowl. Donovan getting fat and happy the past 3-4 years (in what was left of his productive years) showed everyone how committed to being great he really was, and it all that inspiring.I can't help but imagine what TO and McNabb (in his prime) could have done together if TO wasn't such a bitch. -
like_that
Never said TO wilted. He just turned into a little bitch during the off season, and he never played a down in an Eagles uniform again, when the team was prime to return many guys and could have made another run. Donovan wasn't getting fat and happy during that time either. He was in his prime, and he was a pretty damn QB. People seem to forget how good he was because of his last few years in the NFL.IggyPride00;1255345 wrote:T.O wasn't the one who wilted in the bright lights of that Super Bowl. Donovan getting fat and happy the past 3-4 years (in what was left of his productive years) showed everyone how committed to being great he really was, and it all that inspiring. -
HereticOwens was relevant outside of Cincinnati during his career. Therefore, him.
-
Laley23TO is a top 5 WR all time. Chad wasnt even a top 5 WR any year in his career.
-
Rotinaj
Considering CJ was a 3x all pro I'm going to have to disagree with your 2nd sentence.Laley23;1255671 wrote:TO is a top 5 WR all time. Chad wasnt even a top 5 WR any year in his career. -
vball10setT.O.
*are -
Azubuike24
Yeah, for about a 5-year span Chad was top 3...03-04 through 07-08. Over that span...yearly averages.Rotinaj;1255683 wrote:Considering CJ was a 3x all pro I'm going to have to disagree with your 2nd sentence.
92.4 receptions
1374 receiving yards
8.6 touchdowns
Over 15 ypc as well
Most importantly, in those 5 years, Chad played 80 games. The same CAN'T be said for Terrell Owens, RandyMoss, Larry Fitzgerald, Andre Johnson or Steve Smith. Also, if you compare his numbers, they are better than Smith, Reggie Wayne, Fitzgerald and Andre Johnson. Chad may have been a lot of things, but he was durable and productive.
You can actually argue, Chad's 5-year averages are better than any 5 consecutive years for ANY of these guys. His problem is the longevity, but for those 5 years he may have been the best in the NFL. -
Laley23Rotinaj;1255683 wrote:Considering CJ was a 3x all pro I'm going to have to disagree with your 2nd sentence.
It was said for effect lol.Azubuike24;1255765 wrote:Yeah, for about a 5-year span Chad was top 3...03-04 through 07-08. Over that span...yearly averages.
92.4 receptions
1374 receiving yards
8.6 touchdowns
Over 15 ypc as well
Most importantly, in those 5 years, Chad played 80 games. The same CAN'T be said for Terrell Owens, RandyMoss, Larry Fitzgerald, Andre Johnson or Steve Smith. Also, if you compare his numbers, they are better than Smith, Reggie Wayne, Fitzgerald and Andre Johnson. Chad may have been a lot of things, but he was durable and productive.
You can actually argue, Chad's 5-year averages are better than any 5 consecutive years for ANY of these guys. His problem is the longevity, but for those 5 years he may have been the best in the NFL.
But since we are on the topic, I would guess I could go back and look at stats and say CJ was arguably top 5 and probably was in a few seasons, but not definite any year. Big yards guy a few years (led league I think) but not as much on TDs. Receptions were pretty solidly in the top 5 though.
But again, I was saying that for effect. As in, this topic isnt even close.