Archive

Best/Worst Draft

  • bases_loaded
    sleeper;1156633 wrote::rolleyes:

    Okay, everyone, go home. We aren't all experts, we cannot criticize or post our opinions on anything because base_loaded says so.

    #sleeperwins

    Back up your original post or admit you're a lil bitch troll

    #umad
  • lhslep134
    Non;1156579 wrote:
    Oakland was probably the worst. Their first pick was No. 95 overall and no real eye-catching picks after that.
    Gotta include Pryor in there too, right? I mean he "was" their 3rd rounder I guess.
  • sleeper
    bases_loaded;1156666 wrote:Back up your original post or admit you're a lil bitch troll

    #umad
    Back it up with what? There's no evidence needed for an opinion. I'm not passing my opinions off as fact.

    #sleeperwins
  • j_crazy
    robj55;1156572 wrote:Not a fan of the Cunningham pick?

    Well I'm okay with bj. But miller? And trading UP to get him? Don't much like the kaddu pick either.
  • sportchampps
    Pittsburgh had a good draft but I think Mike Adams is garbage even in the second round.

    He looksth part of an NFL player but lacks the heart and kiler instinct and it's hard to coach that.
  • Cat Food Flambe'
    Non;1156579 wrote:I'll give Cincinnati the nod as the best. There were some other teams that were strong at the top but the Bengals had the most complete draft, getting good value all three days.
    Apparently the Brown family has kidnapped Mikey and packed him off to a desert island until next month.
  • se-alum
    sportchampps;1156807 wrote:Pittsburgh had a good draft but I think Mike Adams is garbage even in the second round.

    He looksth part of an NFL player but lacks the heart and kiler instinct and it's hard to coach that.
    If there's anywhere that can be coached, it's Pittsburgh.
  • BR1986FB
    Cat Food Flambe';1157978 wrote:Apparently the Brown family has kidnapped Mikey and packed him off to a desert island until next month.
    To be honest, with Cincinnati's limited scouting resources I'm starting to think that they just buy a draft guide with the player rankings and just pick the top "name" players left on the board. Might sound crazy but that might be the way to go with the success of their recent drafts. :D
  • BR1986FB
    sportchampps;1156807 wrote:Pittsburgh had a good draft but I think Mike Adams is garbage even in the second round.

    He looksth part of an NFL player but lacks the heart and kiler instinct and it's hard to coach that.
    I had read where Pittsburgh had completely taken Adams off their draft board and he (Adams) had to beg/convince them to reconsider. Think it was that Bouchette guy from the Pittsburgh Post Gazette who wrote something about it.
  • Raw Dawgin' it
    robj55;1156561 wrote:Tannehill has talent and all the tools, just needs more experience. He can sit behind Matt Moore or Garrard for a year or 2 and I'll be fine with that. Plus he already ran Mike Sherman's offense so it should make for an easy transition.
    What ever helps you sleep at night.