Archive

Cleveland Sports Fans

  • SportsAndLady
    Con_Alma;1027345 wrote:It was a leading question.

    Location dictates revenue, which dictates the ability to put greater talent vs competitors in the game.

    Green bay Wisconsin disagrees with you
  • Con_Alma
    SportsAndLady;1027361 wrote:Green bay Wisconsin disagrees with you
    Green Bay Doesn't have an MLB team. That's what the $50M payroll comment was referring to. GB can't disagree. They aren't even in the discussion.
  • Tigerfan00
    Pick6;1027332 wrote:Just imagine if the Indians were sold to Steinbrenner....
    The very sad part about this comment is back in the early 70s Steinbrenner had a deal to buy the Indians and the owner at the time backed out at the last minute.
  • Pick6
    Tigerfan00;1027363 wrote:The very sad part about this comment is back in the early 70s Steinbrenner had a deal to buy the Indians and the owner at the time backed out at the last minute.
    haha I know, thats why I brought it up.
  • Sonofanump
    Pick6;1027332 wrote:Just imagine if the Indians were sold to Steinbrenner....
    It would have been "Major League" in real life. Bad attendance would have lead to a break in the lease, team re-located to Tampa-St. Pete.
  • Con_Alma
    Sonofanump;1027387 wrote:It would have been "Major League" in real life. Bad attendance would have lead to a break in the lease, team re-located to Tampa-St. Pete.
    I totally agree.
  • SportsAndLady
    Con_Alma;1027362 wrote:Green Bay Doesn't have an MLB team. That's what the $50M payroll comment was referring to. GB can't disagree. They aren't even in the discussion.

    Didn't realize that..fuck me right?
  • Con_Alma
    SportsAndLady;1027396 wrote:Didn't realize that..**** me right?
    Hmmm. **** you? I don't think so.
  • Sonofanump
    SportsAndLady;1027396 wrote:Didn't realize that..**** me right?
    Just Curious, what did you think the team name was for the MLB team in Green Bay?
  • Heretic
    Con_Alma;1027345 wrote:It was a leading question.

    Location dictates revenue, which dictates the ability to put greater talent vs competitors in the game.
    But to a degree, it's a chicken-egg thing. If a team is winning, they make more revenue, which in turn they (in theory) invest into higher payroll, whether that be in free agency or by resigning their young players. I'm pretty sure that when Cleveland was competing for the WS a couple years in the mid-90s, their payroll was much higher in comparison to other teams than what it is now (using "in comparison" because the overall landscape has raised a lot over the past couple decades).

    Or to phrase things differently...is a market like, say, St. Louis really THAT MUCH larger than a Cleveland or Pittsburgh? Or is it that St. Louis is a baseball town while those two are more football towns. Cards fans will support that team die hard all the time, while the Rams seem to be more in the "popular ticket when good" category. In Pitt or Cleve, the excitement's there when the team's doing well, but during lean years, it evaporates. So, those teams don't have the consistent revenue input that a team that's the epicenter of a city's entertainment would bring in.
  • Con_Alma
    No doubt. I agree that it's a chicken - egg thing.

    I think St. Louis' tv market is much bigger than Clev or Pitts...isn't it? They draw geographically for miles too.

    St. Loius has a lot of true fans whil Clev & Pitts have some fans with others who are attracted to a winning product and show when things are going good.
  • Skyhook79
    Sonofanump;1027460 wrote:Just Curious, what did you think the team name was for the MLB team in Green Bay?
    He will probaly will just tell you to die or kill yourself. Thats his usual response when he is wrong about something. But thinking Green Bay had a MLB team is hilarious. Maybe he thought the Brewers were in Green Bay.
  • like_that
    Skyhook79;1027555 wrote:Nothing to see here, just trolling.
    k.
  • Skyhook79
    Pick6;1027334 wrote:darren rovell @darrenrovell
    Tom Reed of the Plain Dealer (@PDCavsInsider) reporting Cavs season ticket renewal rates at just above 30%. Yikes.

    darren rovell @darrenrovell
    Cavaliers got to the abysmal 30% season renewal rate because they canceled out of state accounts owned by ticket brokers
    #like_that'ed
  • like_that
    Skyhook79;1027566 wrote:Nothing to see here, just trolling.
    k.
  • SportsAndLady
    Sonofanump;1027460 wrote:Just Curious, what did you think the team name was for the MLB team in Green Bay?

    When he said the TV market determines how popular the team is I didnt realize the conversation was only about the MLB (I happen to agree with that comment BTW). I wasn't really too into the convo, just saw that comment and the packers popped into my head.

    Skyhook, please forgive me for this error
  • Sonofanump
    Gotcha.